1991-105303
. ,.. ~~M!~J~~I-O!~~t~3
~ . 1446 AM
.
. .
. . SAN DIEGO COUNTY SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OfFICE
t .. LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION coMM1WlíWUAHS, COUNTY RECORDER
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION FEESe 0.00
"Louis Schooler Annexation" to
Please return. to: Cardiff Sanitation District
LAFCO,MS A216 Ref. No~\'QA.89-14
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 57200 and 57201, this Certificate is hereby
issued. ¡¡::-.J:)
~ '
The name of each city and/or district involved in this chan8e of f'
organization/rcor8anization, all located within San Diego county. and thc type of ~F
change of organization ordered for each city and/or district is as follows:
Citv or D~trict Tvoe of Chan2e of Or2anization
Cardiff Sanitation District Annexation
A certified copy of the resolution orderin8 this change of
organizatioD/rcor8anization without an election, or the resolution confirming an
order for this chan8e of orøanization/rcolg,-nization after confirmation by the
voters is attaehed hereto and by reference incorporated herein.
A legal description and map of the boundaries of the above-cited change of
organization/reorganization is included in said resolution.
The terms and conditions, if any. of the chan8e ofor8anization/reor8anization arc
indicated on the attached form.
I hereby certify that I have examined the above-cited resolution for a change of
organization/reorganization, and have found that document to be in compliance with
the Commission's resolution approving said change of organization/reorganization.
I further certify that (I) resolutions agreeing to accept a Begotiated exchange of
property tax revenues for this jurisdictional change, adopted by the local agencies
included in the negotiations, have been submittcd to this office, or (2) a master
property tax exchan8e agreement pertinent to this jurisdictional change is on file.
~
~Y:;'~J~ Date February 26, 1991
JA E P. MERRILL
Executive Officer
. ..
,'. . . 1447 .
.
..
'
. LAFCO 1600 Pacific Highway. Room 452
San Diego, CA 92101 . (619) 531-5400
San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission
Chairperson CERTIFICATE RE: TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND INDEBTEDNESS
Fred Nagel
Mayor, Cil)' of
La Mesa Subject: "Louis Schooler Annexation. to the CardiCC Sanitation District
Members (DA89-14)
Brian P. BUbray
County Board of
Supervisors Certain terms and conditions are required by the Local Alellcy Formation
Linell Fromm Commission to be fulfilled prior to the completion of the above-named change
Public Member
Marjorie Hersom of organization.
Alpine Fire
Protection District
Mark]. Loscher V7/0/7~r ~~~ -
Vice Mayor, City of (Title)
San Marcos
John MacDonald do hereby certify that the terms aDd conditions listed below have been fully
County Board of
Supervisors met.
John Sasso
President, Borrego I. The boundaries shall be modified to conform to Exhibit A attached
Water District
Abbe Wolfsheimer hereto.
Councilmember, City of
San Diego 2. Payment by the owner of district annexation fees and State Board of
Alternate Members Equalization charles.
Dr. Lillian Keller Childs
Helix Water DistriCl
Mike Gotch
Public Member
Bruce Henderson
Councilmember, City of
San Diego
Gayle McCandliss
Councilwoman, Cily of
Chub Vista
Leon L. Williams
County Board of
Supervisors Will the affected property be taxed for aDy existinl bonded indebtedness or
Executive Officer contractual obHøation?
Jane P. Merrill Yes ~ No - If yes, specify.
Counsel -:J~ ~
Lloyd M. Harmon, Jr.
S¡lnath. ~ rF~ß ~¡~ í~}~ ffj)
~I
ate /
SA£>J DIEGO l4FcO
-- - I
' ,'"
'1 .. . 1448 .
'
.
, RBSOLt7'1'ION NO. 91-05
A RBSOLUTION OF THB BOARD OP DIRBCTORS
OP THB CARDIPP SANITATION DISTRICT
ANNBXING TBRRITORY TO WHICH OWNBRS HAVB COHSBNTBD
-LOUIS SCHOOLBR ANNBXATION-
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Govermnent
"/l;;::,;;;Reorganization Act of 1985 (GoVt. ,Code, section 5600 et seq.)
" preliminary, proceed~~gs were ccmnenced by resolution of application by
this Board on March 7,1989, as Resolution 'No. 89-04, for annexation
the Cardiff Sanitation District (thereinafter referred to as the
District) of certain territory therein described, which description
has been lOOdified pursuant to the directions of the Local Agency
Formation Cœmission; and
WHEREAS,the annexation proposed by said resolution of
) application was presented to and approved by the Local Agency
Formation Cœmission of San Diego County on December 3,1990, and this
District was designated as the conducting District and authorized by
resolution of order said annexation without notice or hearing and
without an election pursuant to Government Code, Section 56837;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, ORDERED AND DETERMINED, pursuant
to Government Code Section 57025 et seq.;
a. The manner in which and by whan preliminary proceedings
were ccmnenced was ,by resolution of application by this
Board as stated above.
b. The territory to be annexed has been designated DA 89 -14
by the Local Agency Formation Ccmnission, and the exterioJ:'
boundaries of such territory are as hereinafter described.
c. The territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited, and
will be benefited by such annexation as described in Health
and Safety Code Section 4830.
BoOk# J . p... #. .2/
.
. eo
'
. . 144.
. ,
.
.-. . d. The reasons for the proposed. annexation as set forth in the
. \ resolution of application referred to above are:
1. The District is enpowered. to and is engaged in
furnishing sewage disposal facilities.
2. The territory proposed. to be annexed. to said District
is developed. and/or proposed to be developed and used.
for residential and/or cœmercial purposes and
provision for sewage disposal facilities for said
territ~ is essential for such purposes.
- The tenns and conditionS of the proposed annexation are:
e.
Payment of,; annexation and State ~d fees.
f. All the owners of land wi thin such territory have given
their written consent to such annexation, as provided in
Government Code, Section 56837; and therefore, as approved.
and authorized by the Local Agency Formation Cannission,
this Board may adopt its resolution ordering the annexation
without nOtice and hearing and without an election, as
provided. in Gove:rnment Code, Section 57002.
g. The regular County assessment role will be utilized and the
affected territory will be taxed for existing bonded
indebtedness.
) h. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15074
(California Environmental Quality Act of 1970), the Board
fnds that this annexation would not have a significant
effect on the environment.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that pursuant to Government
Code Section 57002, the following described incorporated territory in
the City of Encinitas, State of California, be and it hereby is
annexed. to and made a part of the Cardiff Sanitation District.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Board imrediately
transmit a certified. copy of this resolution along with a remittance
to cover the fees required. by the Government Code Section 54~02. 5 to
the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Comnission of San
Diego County, so that the Executive Officer may make the filings
required by Chapter 8 (ccmnencing with Section 57200), Part 5,
Division 1, Title 6 of the Government Code and by Chapter 8
(cœmencing with Section 54900), Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the
Govermnent Code.
~
Book # J . Pap #. A.
"'-":,;,.'
. <I-
. , .' . 145°.
.
. PASSED AND ADOPrED this 8th day of January, 1991, by the
'ì fOllowing vote, to wit:
AYES: Davis, Hano, Omsted, Slater, Wiegand.
NAYS: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None. '. a~
' 7&~
. ' . " Chairperson of the Board
Cardiff Sanitation District
ATTEST:
)
" E. Jane Pcol. Clerk (',f ti't' p"~,,,., C't 1'"\'""" .
of tl-e C d" v" ~:"",;',"... ' ¡J,r"~1'1"5
. " ' . af t Sanitation Distrif:t'.¡: r: ;-~;~:::":.
CalIfornIa "dh ftU 'f . C., ..Lt""",.",,;:,.
' " O,er...,.,. cer.tl,v LF"(i,c'~ !-,.:"'1'"» ,
P'ør ury"that, .th'.' ~ . '",",','"',, ""'¡';"",', ";
.~Y8 and 10 "', -'. .., .
endcorMct, ", " "':;;'-";,""'" IS,'::1 : "
, 'v chftv of this ^.~ ", "t'" ^ '.
¡n'm ,Iff ,-t'f" ,owv_", L "m~,j (¡;.!,:
' Yo ceo In, 'w"'... """'A';'~'1 t" I....,..
"""1-,' han.,'," 'd" ' '.' J"~""""'",";H.-:"1""",,~,.j,, ,j" '.'.,.,-y" '"
"'.." u an t"""e;...~. .. "00',,;/-
r\,':,>t,~' " "",'--, ' -.W",:.""",,' ""'-,1;1~j"Î~f! £~:"":'/,J"."""""-'.,,"""~'
~"""" ,',' ~~," ," "';""'.',:'""~ :"'~T~-"~\".'
.- VI " ""---::;1.
"i",:_,..."E.,~~,..,. '-,,' / :~ ",.",',',~~,ø4Ja¿~
.. ., ~T" , Board ,"
tl
J ...5 ,;ß
Book # . Paa. #
I
. . ' 0
~ '. . ' . 14.
'
.
DA89-14 -LOU!S SCHOOLER ANNEXATION- TO
~ THE CARDIFF SANIT A TION DISTRICT
. ')
All that portion of the west half of the east half of the southeast quarter of the southwest
quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 24, Township 13 south. Range 4 west, San
Bernardino Basc and Mcridian, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according
to Unitcd Statcs Govcrnment Survey, lying within the following described boundarics:
Commcncing at thc corner common to Sections 23, 24, 25, and 26;
1. Thcnce south 89°49'0'- cast, 984.69 feet along the southerly line of said Section 24
to the westerly linc of said west half of the east half of thc southeast quarter of the
southwest quarter of the southwest quarter, abe;> being a point on thc center line of
Road Survey No. 426 (Manchestc'r Avcnuc) on file in the Office of the County
Engineer's Office of ~aid county, being the truc point of beginning;
2. Thence north 0°02'30-. ..Nest, 340.00 fcct along said westerly line to the northerly linc
of the southerly 340.00 feet of said west half;
3. Thence south 89°49'07- cast, 158.78 feet along said northerly line to thc westerly line
of the castcrly 5.095 fcct of said wcst half of the cast half of thc southeast quartcr
of the southwest Quartcr of the southwest quarter of said Section 24;
4. Thcnce south 0°04'06- east, 340.00 feet along said westerly line to the southcrly line
) of said Section 24, also being a point on said center line of Manchester A venue;
5. Thence north 89°49'0'- west, 158.94 feet along said center line to the true point of
beginning.
Approyed by the Local Ateney Formation
. Commission of San Dieto
j
DEC - 3 1990
~ ~ 'J;~
ih:cg
LAFCO Exhibit A
12/5/90 Page 1 of 1
Book # J . p... #. ~(
-
I
I
.. . .' . N£' 74; SJ</ ~.jt/~
. I ~E G Z4. T I ~ 5o. R <4 W $ a a I M
, r. I, ¡--
';- . I' I ~
~ ~ ~
~ I 11 ~ I tJrr\
~ I \ ~' I ~\
~ ~~' ~~ N r-- -
,~~ . j I 11)
-:-.-..... I ~ I A,
I~ ~ 'r
~ ~ G~
!ii .sO'ß 'ð7"'é" ?
~ ,,~ I r . /4'474' .i-
~ . ~ /
~ ~ .~tYO-'1 Q), ~N ~
~~) I ~ \\O 0.' \" ~
I ~ ~ I ~\Ò' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~()'
~ ~ ~ \~ ~ i
~ (,") I I .~ ; r;;.~:)
I .~ ~ 1(
I ~ t
~ ~ ~ ~
}
A. "-uun
-
DEC 3 1990
..
An,Pt;u..
PLAT OF ~RT Y 7l) 4E ~ . """"A-
ANN ér æ 7lJ CMA'FF SAY /J';9TAW L.V.$~ /CT
PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT 0 A 89 -/4-
PETITION OF LOUIS V. SCHOOLER (262-062-20,21,22 )
AREA 1.~4 ACRES
PROPOSED BOUNDRY "5 t: /~.D-ðð
.f~ ~=---~-
'UMoIIII8 . ,-.. ... CAIU8M. CoIUIl Jl --
-""~- """"""""
-
¡ '.
.-
"
. .
Minute Item: 4
Ref. No.: DA89-14
RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMA TION COMMISSION
OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING THE
-LOUIS SCHOOLER ANNEXATION- TO THE
CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT
On motion of Commissioner Hersom, seconded by Commissioner Loscher, the
followinl resolution is adopted:
WHEREAS, a resolution of application was submitted to this Commission for
annexation of territory to the. Cardiff Sanitation District, which resolution was adopted by
the Board of Directors of said District as Resolution No. 89-04, dated March 7, 1989,
pursuant to Title 5, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the Government Code;
and
WHEREAS, the territory proposed for annexation is as described in the application
on file with the Local Agency Formation Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Executive Officer of the Commission has filed her report on said
annexation, which report was received and considered by the Commission; and
WHEREAS, all owners of land have consented in writing to the annexation;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Commission hereby finds,
determines, and orders as follows:
(1) The Commissicn certifies that it has reviewed and considered the information
contained in the Negative Declaration prepared by the Cardiff Sanitation District.
(2) The Commission hereby approves the annexation with modified boundaries,
as described in Exhibit A attached hereto, subject to the following condition:
Payment by the owner of district annexation fees and State Board of
Equalization charges.
(3) The boundaries of the territory as described in Exhibit A are definite and
certain.
(4) The boundaries of the territory do conform to lines of assessment and
ownership.
(5) The district is a registered-voter district.
(6) The territory includes 1.24 acres and is uninhabited.
1
.
..
. .
I
(7) The territory proposed for annexation is hereby designated the "Louis
Schooler Annexation" to the Cardiff Saóitation District.
(8) The CommissiOil hereby designates the Cardiff Sanitation District as the
conducting authority and authorizes the Board of Directors to conduct proceedings in
compliance with this resolutian without notice and hearinl-
(9) The Executive Officer is hereby authorized and directed to mail certified
copies of this resolution as provided in Section 56853 of the Government Code.
- 2 -
.
Passed and adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the
County of San Diego this 3;rd day of December , 19 90 , by
the following vote:
AYES: ConunissionersB.i1bray, MacDonald, Loscher, Nagel, Hersom,
Sasso, and Fronun
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner WQlfsheimer
ABSTAINING: None
----------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) SS
I, JANE P. MERRILL, Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Com-
mission of the County of San Diego, State of California, hereby certify
that I have compared the foregoing copy with the original resolution
adopted by said Commission at its regular meeting on December 3, 1990
, which original resolution is now on file in my office; and
that same contains a full, true, and correct transcript therefrom and
of the whole thereof.
Wi tness my hand this 12th day of December , 19 90 .
..
~~~-
J P. MERRILL
( E utive Officer.
San Diego County Local Agency
Formation Commission
---, ,---", -- - .'-,- ,-- " .. ----'_._-~+. "' ¿ , -.-
. --
'Of. ~ ~
\A.
~
~
N
~
VICJNITYMAP
NOT- TO SC,ALE
'-
" "~. ~.r-_..<.\
>-...... .', -.w...-. -- '. """'~:J~';
-- '".' ,cU'," '..' cO- " " ',.' "~"",",
~.,jj,?~-- ' , , , ,
I ---,--~
* Date 12-9-88 .
Name IDUIS V. SCHOOToRR
Address P.o. BOX 986
SOLANA BEAæ. CA. 92075
I
* As the proponent(s) for this annexation of property
identified as 262-062-?0.?1 ?? . to the
Assessor's Parcel Numberesy---- .
District. I understand and agree
that annexing nto the District does not guarantee sewer ......
service or commit sewer capacity to the subject property
be1 ng annexed. Also. the District by accepting the
application does not represent that it wi11 provide any
treatment plant expansions or sewer tine extension to
provide capacity or service for the subject area to be
annexed. Acceptance of this app1ication and final
annexation of the property only al1ows the property to
be served at such time as the owner( s) of the annexed
property pay a11 necessary costs for the sewerage
facilities which can transport. treat and dispose of the
." wastewater renerated by the property. This may mean the
proponent(s shall pay for a part or all of the required
facilities to serve the property.
* X
2/2-012 .
. "...._",",.",.,._"",":. ,,"
. .
RESOLUTION NO. 89-04
} RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT
FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has received a request from
Louis Schooler that the hereinafter described territory to be
annexed to the Cardiff Sanitation District (hereinafter referred
to as the Sanitation District); and
<.
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors desires to initiate
proceedings to annex said territory to the Sanitation District;
BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED as follows:
1. Pursuant to Government Code sections 56800 and 56700,
application is hereby made to the Local Agency Formation
Commission of the County of San Diego for a proposed
change of organization as follows:
'" A. This proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox
¡ Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (S.
56000, et. seq., Govt. Code).
B. The nature of the proposed change of organization
and the names of all districts for which any such
change of organization is proposed as follows: The
annexation of the hereinafter described territory
to the Sanitation District.
C. The names of all other affected counties, cities and
districts are: City of Encinitas.
D. A description of the exterior boundaries of the
territory proposed to be annexed to the Sanitation
District is described in Exhibit "A" hereto
attached.'
E. Said territory is uninhabited and comprises
approximately 1.23 acres.
F. It is proposed that said territory be annexed
subject to the following condition: Payment of
district annexation and State Board fees.
TH/O3/245wp5 (2-27-89)
"':'> \Lo
~ . Page #
Book #
. .
G. All the owners of land within such territory have
given their written consent to such annexation
') subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions.
H. The reasons for this proposal are as follows:
(1) The Sanitation District is empowered to and is
engaged in furnishing sewage disposal
facilities.
(2) The territory proposed to be annexed to said
District is developed and/or proposed to be
developed and used for residential and/or
commercial purposes and provision for sewerage
disposal facilities for said territory is
essential for such purposes. ".
I. It is hereby reqtlested that proceedings be taken for
the annexation of territory as hereinabove proposed.
J. This annexation is consistent with the sphere of
influence of the Sanitation District.
2. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15074
(California Environmental Quality Act of 1970), the Board
finds that this annexation would not have a significant
effect on the environment (Negative Declaration Log No.
J 85-8-25).
:c :
.. 3. The Clerk of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized
and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution
with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of the County of San Diego.
~ TH/O3/245wp5 (2-27-89)
3'
I
-
Book # 2- . Page #--D-
. .
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7 day or March, 1989, by the following
) vote, to wit:
AYES: Gaines, Hano, Omsted, Shea, Slater
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None ~
p m~Pre~~he Board
Cardiff Sanitation District
BoarC:
/,
I, E. ,~,' .~ r GOL, Clerk of the Board of Director:;
of t~1: ,- <'¡if Sanitation District. Encinltas
C;;'¡brni;:~ do hereby certify that the above 'and
fc~cgoing is a true and correct copy of the
original of this document on file In my office.
In witness whereof I have set my hand and the
seal of the Cardiff Sa.llltatlon District this
{2¡~ day of '.~ ~;, 19 82
J.[~ ß. . 7-P/l 0
i1~ -'::;rk of the Board .'
j
TH/O3/24SwpS (2-27-89)
)
I
2- \<ß
Book # . Page #
r I. /V 3' :I.4t S ~I/ :1,4 ff ý/ :I);
l ' 1-
, ~.\
, ,
~ ~ ~
~ r~l ~ \ì\
~ ~ ()(
, \ ~ ~ \
~ ~~' ~~\ N ~ -
~~ (~ I r ì;
~ ~ ~ (~"\
I. ~ "~
~ ~ . . ~ -
~ C¡. (~
~ j Sð'..!J-f'.,9 'tJ7"ë (
~ ~ r /.:5ß. 7ð ' C)
\ \\\ IA9 f}, \'\, -fL
"""i ,) ("'1./ .J N) 1\ ,'I
~~) ~ ~ r) () (h' ~ ~/\
:ç ") V ) ~,
.~ ~ ~ PC L. / ,~ "\
IS ~ ~ ~ ~
I~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ' ~
. ~ ~ ~
I ~ ì\ ~ ~ (f
"\J y ~ ~ ()~
~~' ~ peL. ê ~ \
(~ ) ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ t'\)
---~)
23 24 0
.5ß5J~3'()7'~ ' ,'~c;.9' /58.~4'
hJA#ëflE.5TéR .~ AVe.-, R-S. CÚ1 --
Rt1Ll. ' '
,
~
PLAT OF P/?OPEI?TY TO 8E"
ANNE YEt> m CA,R.oiFF 5A.IV /TA77ðAl LJ/.5TR/CT
. , .
PROPOSED ~NNEXATION TO CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT
PETITION OF LOUIS V. SCHOOLER (262-062-20,21,22 )
"1 AREA 1.2 3 .~CRES /ê-/..3'-æ
. ,i PROPOSED BOUNDRY
- . ~ ('l @ -' ÇiJ)f!::!I- CONSULTANTS I
B k # ¿;,..,-. Page # ,"'\ CIVllEHC¡IHEU'HG ~7~<>-7"fLCA"INOUAL.IlANO«>LACOSTA
00 'lA..HIHC¡' "'OCEU,HC¡ CARL.5aA.D.CAlIFO"-H'A "001
W.V<YIHC¡ ""'HE ~"""""0'0
. .
TO: Board of Directors
* CARDIFF Sanitation District
* The undersigned property owners* in the vicinity of MANCHESTER AVENUR
in the unincorporated territory of the County of San Diego respectfully request
and consent to the commencement of proceeding for the annexation of the property
* described opposite our names to the CARDIFF Sanitation District
* and further consent to this annexation subject to any and all regulations~fees,
and/or charges established under the provisions of existing CARDIFF
Sanitation District ordinances.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED
State Lot, Block, Subdivision's name
Please sign and Map No. or Section, Township and ASSESSOR'S
DATE NAME AND ADDRESS Range or Address of Property.* PARCEL NO.
*
12-9-88 LOUIS V. SCHOOLER W !s of E Y, OF S Y, OF' 'T'HF. F. ~ ()¡;" 'T'HF'. 262 062
P.O. BOX 986 SW 1.;;- OF THF. SW 1.;;- OF' !=;F'C ?4 'T'ns 20,21,22
. .
SOLANA BEACH, CA. 92075 R4W. SAN BERNARDTNO RA!=;R ANn MRRTDAN
COUNTY OF S. D.. STATE OF C'.A.. LYTNC', S' T ,y
OF A LIl\¡'E DRAWN PARAT ,T.F.T , WITH AND DISTANT
.
320 . 00 FEET N I LY FROM THE N' LY LINE OF C'DUNTY
ROAD SURVEY NO. 426 (MANCHESTER AVE. ). EXCEPT
THEREFROM TEE EAST 5.095 FEET THEREOF.
1
* r¡g.
SIGNATU DATE:
*If property is in escrow, please note the approximate date of completion of escrow.
Please return petition to: ~o~ 1-/ t:'N; £"
cjo CI TY' 0 F F-1-1C/I'-1 IT" ¡q S
. _c ¡" s-2r¡ f'!:f.-)CINrr1IJ 1?LVJ)
- E ¡"JC 1/-...) 1T14-J' c~
~- q'2 0 '2.. L{
- - - ~
e(l_{ L{ - SL> r"} 1
Phone
. .
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF
PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED TO
CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT
ALL THAT PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH
HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN
BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF
SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF,
LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 320.00
FEET NORTHERLY FROM THE NORTHERLY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO.
426, (MANCHESTER AVENUE) 40.00 FEET WIDE, A PLAT OF WHICH IS ON
FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY.
EXCEPT THEREFROM THE EAST 5.095 FEET THEREOF. SAID PORTION
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
Ec~i~~ing at the Southwest Corner of said section 24 as shown on
Parcel Map No. 2162, said Corner being at the intersection of the
centerline of El Camino Real according to Road Survey 1802-1 and
the centerline of Manchester Avenue according to Road Survey 426;
1. thence Easterly along the Southerly line of section 24 and the
centerline of Manchester Avenue, South 89° 49' 07" East,
984.69 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
2. thence North 00° 02' 30" West, 340.00 feet;
3. thence South 89° 49' 07" East, 158.78 feet;
4. thence South 00° 04' 06" East, 340.00 feet to a point on the
centerline of Manchester Avenue;
5. thence North 89° 49' 07" West, 158.94 feet to the TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
BO/03/MS4-763wp5 (3-2-89-1)
I . ./1/£ :I /4 S £,1/ %c .~ %
r -[ , I~
~
"
, ~
t\s " (~,
l
~ ell ~ )
~ ~Ì\'
\ (\1 ~
~
~ (("> ~~\ N I;
I\¿ \>\\
(~(
.....
~ ~ 5ðß.l ~.~
~ ~'
I'J ~
~
-'í (?ì(>
~ "'¡
r ~,/")19 0)
~ ~ /5ð. 7ß' j¿
~
~ ~ ~' èf~
~) ~ ~ 1 Q (J.,' 'X{
:s: ')} <, ' pc t. / ,~\.)~
I~ ~ ~
~ s:s ~ \\
\) ~ ~ S:)
-'\ ~
(Jì i))
~ Ç\ ~ ().::
. \À~
(h' PCL. ê ~ {(~
q'r\ ~
0
Ç) ,
~ <;:) ~
"1
---)
.s ßJJ4?!J " 7 "é ~ ~.9' /58.~4' 0
IHANCHc.5TéR ~ Ave.- --
R.S. t?6
Rð.B.
,
~
PLAT OF P,ROPE~TY TO BE
ANNE YEt> Jl) CA.RPIFF SAIV ITA77ð# OISTRICT
PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT
PETITION OF LOUIS V. SCHOOLER (262-062-20,21,22 )
AREA 1.23 ACRES /e-ß-¿¡¿¡
PROPOSED BOUNDRY
~ ~~':!11 CONSUL ~~~2~~L CAMINO REAL. RANCHO LA COSTA
PLANNING' ~ROCESSING CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92001
SURVEYING ~HONE 6"/944-1010
8S - /004
. .
~ ~
Of!. ~
~
\1\ ' ~
'b
~ \j
.
N
~
VICINITY MAP
NOT' TO SCALE
SCHOOLER ANNEXATION
CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT
. /. " {V¡;;: '-. Vc..-"', ~~ - .f 004- - ~
'e. ,..,-~ CO"TY OF SAN D8GO ~.2 ~,'~~~ -
., ~'" ." ~~rrlÇm~""lÇ (Çj)f ~I~"""""~ ~ 1L~ßl)dJ lUJs,~ 11 . ~"
Pleue ..nd reply to oHic. checked:
n 5201 Rutfln Road. Sui:e 9 :: WAL TEA C. LADWIG. DIRECTOR 0 334 Via Vera Cruz
'--J San Dipço. CA 92123.1êêû - 5201 ;:¡uffin Road. Suite B San Marcos. CA 92069-2638
(619) 56S.307:! San 0leço. CA 92123.1666 (6191741.42:36
.619) 565.3001
May 16, 1985
TO: DIRECTOR, DEPART~ENT OF PLANNING AND LAND USE
FROM: - ENVIRONMENTAL ?LANNING
RECOMMENDED FINDING OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION: V3S-0l0, TPM 18431, Log No.85-8-25
L.V. Schooler/San Dieguito
FINDING:
The Environmental Planning staff has examined the Initial Study below and is
-~ recommending that the proposed project will not have significant effect on the
environment, and that an Environmental Impact Report need not be prepared
pursuant to the San Diego County Procedures for Environmental Impact Review,
revised August 1, 1983.
--. - ~ INITIAL STUDY SUMMARY
--- --
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: ."'. .
The project is a minor subdivision of 1.16 acres 'into two' parcels of 0.56 and
0.60 acres gross each, and a variance to allow 0.45 acres lot instead of 0.5
-- acres minimlll1 as required by the Zoning Ordinance. The site is located on
Manchester Avenue, 985 feet east of it1s intersection with El Camino Real, in
the 01 ivenhain area. The proj ect proposes annexat ion to the 01 ivenhai n
Sanitation District.
THOMAS BROS COORDINATES: 30~ B-2 FIELD CHECKED: no ANALYST: M.U. Evans
San Dieguito Comma Plan #3 Residential 2 dull acres
RS-2 Use Regulation 2 dull acres
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING:
The site is a gentle south-facing slope; parcel 2 contains an existing triplex,
parcell is vacant. The site is vegetated in introduced landscape vegetation;
residential uses exist on the east and sides.
POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ErFECTS:
:ione.
,- ..- --. - -
.. ..- . -.' . -
.-...... ----".._u - -__."'n'- ..---._u. -.~...n ___,m-
-~_. "--""" ...c.--..- -.-.--- --...'-.-.'. -., -..- ..
--- .-.... -~--. .--- - -
.-. .- .. .. . -. '."'
_.- .-... .-. --- n..' .. --- .
. . .
.... . (619) 481-0275 SAN DIEGUITO NATIONAL BANK
P.O. .OX 926, ENCINITAS. CA 92024 90-3821
li:'~~~r '- ~ 1222
" """, "
LOUIS V. SCHOOLER
, ",':- BUSINESS ACCOUNT
,'<",,- P.O. BOX 986 117-3
SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92075
PAY ~L- I ~ Å A - --6. A. 4 J J $jb - DOLLARS
I 1
Cl ~ ~~~
11800 . . 7 J 118 1:.222JB2.JI:-~.1I 20bIl17J711" "', '
Locai Agency Formation C.ission . Da te Dee. 8, 1988
1600 Pacific Highway, Room 452
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: (619) 531-5400
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION/REORGANIZATION APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE
I. This questionnaire may be used for the following changes of government organization: city and
specia I district annexations and detachments, or a combination thereof, referred to as a
reorganiza tion.
Agency Change of Organization
* Cardiff Sanitation District annexation
A. The following items must be submitted with this application:
1. A certified resolution OR a petition of landowners/registered voters making appli-
cation.
a. If initiated by resolution, submit property owner consent form.
* 2. I copy of a metes-and-bounds legal description of the perimeter of the subject area.
3. A reproducible plat map and 1-O-1>£;'8oÌ'S. (8~ by 11 corresponding to the metes-
and -bounds)
* 4. 2 copies of a vicinity map of the subject territory. (8~ by 11)
5. Environmental documents:
~
+ a. Negative Declaration: If an ND has been prepared for this project, submit 1
copy of the NO, Initial Study, and resolution certifying the ND.
+ b. Environmental Impact Report: If an EIR has been prepared for this project,
submit 15 copies of the certified EIR. Only I copy of the EIR appendix is
required. Also submit a copy of the resolution certifying the EIR.
c. If no environmental review has been conducted, submit a completed Initial
Study form.
..~
+ 6. If the proposal includes annexation to a city, submit I copy of the city resolution
approving the prezoning and general plan land use designations for the subject
territory.
7. LAFCO processing fee (refer to fee schedule).
B. Additional information pertaining to the factors LAFCO must consider may be requested
during LAFCO staff's review of the proposal.
(7/07/87)
I
. .
This application must be completed in consultation with city or district staff and signed off by
that contact person. All questions must be answered (use Nj A if not applicable).
II. DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFlCAtTION
A. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
* 1. Is the subject territory to be developed at this time?
YES, AFTER t-'lAP IS APPROVED
* 2. If yes, generally describe the anticipated development (building types, facilities,
number of units).
ONE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON PARCEL 1
Please indicate below ill discretionary permits or approvals from a city or the County which
+ will be needed to complete the project and the projected approval date. If already granted,
please indicate the date of approval and submit copy of resolution of approval.
Is Resolution
Project Date of of Approval
Aooroval File No. Aoorovai Attached?
City or County Plan Amendment
Prezoning (City)
/ Rezone (County)
.
/ / Tentative Subdivision Map
Tentative Parcel Map TPM NO. 18431 6-31-85 YES
Major Use Permit
Other 1\W,GATIVE DECLARATION LCG NO. 85-8-25 5-16-85 YES
--
--.:illlP.TANC'F, OL 88-008 10-18-88 YES
87-155 TPM/TIME EXTENSION 87-155 lO-l.b-éHj :i.t;~
.~
3. If no development is planned at this time, will approval of the proposed jurisdic-
tional change increase the development potential of the property? N/A
(If so, please indicate in terms of allowable uses, and number of units.)
4. If development is not planned at this time, when is development of the area antici-
pated? N/A
2
, . .
.
* 5. In as much detail as possible, please explain. why this proposal is necessary at this
time (e.g., an approved development or an existing structure requires service not
currently provided or available).
EXISTING DWELLING UNIT ON PARCEL 2 IS SERVED BY SEPTIC SYSTEM.
APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP REQUIRES ANNEXATION IN'IO THE
CARDIFF SANITATION DIS1RICT.
B. GENERAL INFORMA TJON
* I. Please describe the general location and physical features of the territory which is
the subject of this proposal. Refer to major highways, roads, watercourses, and
topographical features.
1.23 ACRES ABUTTING NORTH SIDE OF MANCHESTER AVENUE APPROXIMATELY
985 FT. EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL. EXISTING TOPCX;RAPHY SIDPES TO THE
SOUTH. PARCEL 1 IS UNDEVEIDPED, PARCEL 2 IS FULLY DEVEIDPED.
* 2. How many acres of territory are included in this proposal? 1.23 X
* 3. How many people live within the subject territory? 4 x.
* 4. How many registered voters live within the subject territory? 4 x.
.
C. LAND USE INFORMA TJON
C Z' For County general plan and zoning information call 565-5981. If subject area is within
I~fO. o~~~:5981a city, call that city's planning department.
*
I. County .
a. Is the territory within a county community planning area? X':.
If so, which one?
b. What is the County General Plan or community planning area designation?
X.
c. Wh:! t is the existing County zoning? x.
* --2. City
Contact
a ffected city a. Is the territory within a ci2'H~.eneral plan area? YES
If so, which city? EN I ITAS "
b. What is the city's land-use designation? #3 RESIDENTIAL 2 D.U./AC.
c. Has any city zoned or prezoned the territory? YES
If so, which city? ENCINITAS
d. How is the territory zoned or prezoned? RS2
3
* 3. How is the itory presently used (e.g., vacant; ~ Jves; 3 single-family residences,
etc)? Please bt; specific as to structures, improvements, facilities now on property.
PARCEL 1 - UNDEVELDPED
PARCEL 2 - EXISTING RENTAL TRIPLEX 'Iû BE CONVERTED 'Iû SINGLE
* FAMJLY ¡y;~mG ~T BEFORE BUIWING PERMIT CAN BE GRANTED
4. How are a pcent an s us . 'Iû PARCEL 1
North: S.F. CWELLING
East: S.F. DWEILING
South: UNDEVELDPED
West: S.F. DWELLING
* 5. Does any portion of the subject territory contain any of the following:
Agricultural Land U~es NO Flood Control Channel NO
Agricultural Preserve NO River or Creek NO
Scenic corridor zone NO IOO-year flood line NO
Open Space Easement NO Coastal bluff NO
Airport noise contour NO A rchaeo log ica l/h is tor ical
Coastal permit zone YF'.~ features NO
Sewer Moratorium area NO Other unusual features
Slopes greater than 25% NO (specify) NO
Mature Trees YF'.~
III. PUBLIC SER VICES INVENTOR Y
A. SEWAGE DISPOSAL
1. Public Sewer System
.
a. Is the subject territory within a district or city that provides public sewer
service? No If so, what agency? N/A
b. Is annexation for sewer service necessary? Yes
(If No, skip to Question # 2 (Septic System»). If yes, what district or city?
* CARDIFF SANITATION
* c. What is the distance for connection to the agency(ies) existing sewer system?
620 FT.
._~
d. Has the affected agency issued a letter of sewer availability? N/A
If yes, provide a copy of the letter with your application.
e. Will the agency be prepared to furnish service immediately? If not, explain.
Yes
No
f. Is the territory in a sewer moratorium area?
4
" ". '.. '"
. ..
No
g. Is the subject territory to be annexed to ~n improvement district?
* h. Specify any improvements (on and off site) that will be necessary to connect
and serve the anticipated development. Indicate the total cost of these
improvements and nftthod of financing (e.g., general property tax, assessment
district, landowner or developçr fees).
$76,000 'Iû CONNECT 'Iû EXISTING SEWER PAID BY:LANI:aVNER
1. Capacity of Treatment Facility:
(1) What is the physical design capacity of the sewage treatment plant which
will serve the annexation area? 3 MGD.
(2) What is the current average daily sewage treatment volume of wastewater
being treated at the plant? VIJIZ!~5 MGD.
(3) Does the affected agency currentiy have sufficient capacity to service the
terri tory? Yes . If not, what plan does the agency have to
increase its capacity?
J. Capacity of Transmission Lines:
(1) What is the physical design capacity of the affected sewer main (trans-
mISSIOn line or pipeline) which conveys wastewater to. the treatment
facility? Varies MGD. Adequate capacity for thlS proJec .
(2) What is the current loading rate of the sewer main? Varies MGD.
(3) Does the affected agency currently have .sufficient capacity in its sewer
main to serve the territory? Yes . If not, what plan does the agency
have to increase its capacity?
k. Capacity of Outfall Lines:
(1) What is the physical design capacity of the affected outfall line which
--- conveys treated effluent to the ocean or ocean outfall system? VariesMGD.
Adequate capacity for this project.
(2) What is the current loading rate of the outfall line? Varies MGD.
(3) Does the affected agency currently have sufficient capacity in the outfall
line to serve the territory? Ypc:, If not, what plan does the
agency have to increase its capacity?
5
2. Septic Syster
* a. Is a septic system(s) currently used on the property? YES
* b. Will septic system be used upon annexation and development of the property?
NO
¡/;
* c. If 2.b. is answered yes, please ~nswer the following:
( I) Have percolation tests been conducted?
(2) Dept. of Public Health approval?
B. WATER SUPPLY
1. Is the subject territory within a district or city that provides water service? YES
3. If so, what district or city? OLIVTh1HAIN
2. Is annexation for water service necessary? NO
a. If so, what district or city?
3. Is the agency prepared to immediately furnish the necessary service?
If not, explain.
4. Is water service currently provided to the territory? YES
a. If so, what is the current water demand? 660 ~ GPD
(I) For what purpose? OOMESTIC
5. Will the project be connected to an existing water lint? PRESENTLY CONNEÇTED
a. Distance to tie-in
b. When will service be extended to territory?
c. The total anticipated wate! demand will be:
(I) Residential use MGD.
-- (2) Industrial/Commercial use MGD.
(3) Agricultural use MGD.
6. Is the subject territory to be annexed to an improvement district? NO
a. If so, which one(s)?
-
7. Specify any improvements (on and off site) that will be necessary to connect and
serve the anticipated development. Indicate the total cost of these improvements
and method of financing (e.g., general property tax, assessment district, landowner
or developer fees). NONE REQUIRED
6
"'..'.' . ,. .""
. '.
C. FIRE PROTECTION N/A
1. Is the territory currently within a fire district or city? ý£s
/
a. If so, which one? EAlo/V / T~.s
v,
2. If not, is annexation for fire protect)on part of this application?
3. Is structural fire protection necessary?
, -
4. Location of nearest fire station: /~/¿r:s-
a. Esti ma ted response ti me: ~//\/ (Priori ty)
. /S';..,/A)
(Non-priority)
D. POLICE PROTECTION N/A
F-ò~
1. What police agency currently serves this territory? Cot//.ffY .J //.Eø FF C/Tj/
a. Location of nearest police station? //#7/~E
,
b. Estimated response time: S /"?/N (Priority)
2 S- Þ"'?I N (Non-priority)
2. What police agency would serve this territory if this jurisdictional change IS
approved? SA/n~ ,4s /fß'ot/E
a. Location of nearest police station?
b. Estimated response time: (Priority)
.
(N on-priori ty)
E. SCHOOLS N/A
1. Will development on the territory generate any school-age children? pC! Sf /,æ¿;
How many:
a. Grades K - 6
- b. Grades 7 - 9
c. Grades 10 - 12
.J7?N bJ/Et::"t7/7õ ..rC/~ðOL-
2. What school district{s) is the subject territory within? LJ/.J7?ZIcr-.
3. Are any elementary or secondary schools serving the subject territory operating
above design capacity? If so, which schools?
7
F. FLOOD CONTRO. N/A
1. Describe the major drainage area within which the subject territory is located:
/ý();Ve:
Ii.
2. Are there existing flood control facilities on the territory? )\)0
If so, describe.
3. If this territory is annexed to a city, has the city planned for improvements to
provide for flood control in the area (on or off site)? Æ
YES J(/,tl¿;J/t//¡::Jþ/L J/./H¿C,. eO;«/7..eI¡r~£. ç 'IV (}O /d 7#$
.r~ P/F'¿;o coc//Yry r¿'t)e> P C-o¡../1f'/t:.o c.... PI-rTJe./Cr Fe> ¡z,
Fv'rvlll-£""- Z/l?1"",;ed (/h þ?þ.""fi/ T:.r.
G. TRANSPORTATION N/A
1. Designate the names and types of roads which the project will use for primary and
secondary access (include direct access streets from the project site to the nearest
freeway):
Street Name Type (Right of Way Width) Current level of Service
/'1/;Æ/ ch'E JTE /¿ ~J/Æ
2. Is widening of an existing street necessary? /(/O
3. Is the project served by County-maintained roads? //0
4. Is construction of new access streets necessary? /l/ i)~ .
I
5. What is the distance to the nearest shopping center? ~ miles.
6. Is public transportation available? Yß. How distant? ~ miles.
IV. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE N/A
A." Is the territory to be annexed or reorganized located withiYthe sphere of influence of
"'the city/district to which it is proposed to be annexed? £.s:
B. Will a sphere of influence amendment for any affected agency be required?
Which agency(ies)? Nó
8
.., """".. .. ... "., """"-" d""""""""""'"
. .
V. SPECIAL REVENUES - ANNEXING CITY OR DISTRICT MUST COMPLETE THIS SECTION
A. Docs the city/district have current plans to establish any new assessment districts which
would include this area, in order to pay for new or extended services? Please'detail.
v,
No
B. Docs the affected territory contain existing commercial activities which genera te ten
million dollars per year or more in retail sales? No
C. Will the area assume any existing bonded indebtedness upon annex'3tion to city/district?
Please explain, and indicate taxpayer cost.
Any existing bonded bebt becones the liability of the property owner after
annexation.
D. Will the territory be subject to any new or additional special taxes, benefit charges, or
fees? Please outline.
Annual sewer service charge after connection to the public sewer system.
E. Which service(s) to be provided to the annexing area by your city/district are presently
being provided by another local agency? (please list each service and current provider).
None
F. Is the city/district requesting an exchange of property tax revenues as the result of this
proposal? No
G. Is a master property tax exchange agreement applicable to .this jurisdictional change?
No .
H. If property tax exchange negotiations are necessary, upon receipt of this application all
affected agencies will be notified of this proposal and provided preliminary information to
begin the negotiation process.
-/~ ¿~ t/77UTY ?~#F Æ.
Gity /Distriet Representative Ti tIe
(signature) ~<Tq-SO7q
Phone Number
9
~
VI. PUBLIC CaNT AC
A. List all agencies, groups, and individuals contacted regarding this proposal.
None
il,
LAFca will consider the persún signing this application below as the proponent of the proposed
* action(s).' Notice and other communications regarding this application (including fee payment) will
be di,ected to the p';Jt: .w? . / I
s;gnatu,.:-,...,~ ¡'" r'., r!t1-.j ,(
') -., V r
Da te: ^' - / .~ -. ,
Print or Type
Name:
Representing:
Address:
Phone No.
* If you wish anyone other than the proponent of this application to receive notices and reports of
these proceedings, please include here: .
Name:
Address:
---.
(7/07/87)
10
' .
.'
Local Agency Formation C.ission . Date Dee:. 8, 1988
1600 Pacific Highway, Room 452
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: (619) 531-5400
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION/REORGANIZATION APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE
1. This questionnaire may be used for the follo\ving changes of government organization: city and
special district annexations and detach men ts, or a combination thereof, referred to as a
reorganization.
Agency Change of Organization
* Cardiff Sanitation District annexation
A. The following items must be submitted with this application:
1. A certified resolution OR a petition of landowners/registered voters making appli-
cation.
a. If initiated by resolution, submit property owner consent form.
* 2. I copy of a metes-and-bounds legal description of the perimeter of the subject area.
3. A reproducible plat map and }.(H>ÚrHs. (8~ by 11 corresponding to the metes-
and -bounds)
* 4. 2 copies of a vicinity map of the subject territory. (8~ by 11)
5. Environmental documents:
-
+ a. Negative Declaration: If an NO has been prepared for this project, submit 1
copy of the ND, Initial Study, and resolution certifying the NO.
+ b. Environmental Impact Report: If an EIR has been prepared for this project,
submit 15 copies of the certified EIR. Only 1 copy of the EIR appendix is
required. Also submit a copy of the resolution certifying the EIR.
c. If no environmental review has been conducted, submit a completed Initial
Study form.
'-~
+ 6. If the proposal includes annexation to a city, submit 1 copy of the city resolution
approving the prezoning and general plan land use designations for the subject
terri tory.
7. LAFCO processing fee (refer to fee schedule).
B. Additional information pertaining to the factors LAFCO must consider may be requested
during LAFCO staff's review of the proposal.
(7/07/87)
I
. ~
.
This application must be .1pleted in consultation with city o. .istrict staff and signed off by
that contact person. All questions must be answered (use N/ Ã if not applicable).
II. DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION
.
A. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
* 1. Is the subject territory to be developed at this time?
YES, AFTER MAP IS APPROVED
* 2. If yes, generally describe the anticipated development (building types, facilities,
number of units).
ONE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON PARCEL 1
Please indicate below ill discretionary permits or approvals frum a city or the County which.
+ will be needed to complete the project and the projected approval date. If already granted,
please indicate the date of approval and submit copy of resolution of approval.
Is Resolution
Project Date of of Approval
Approval File No. Approval Attached?
City or County Plan Amendment
Prezoning (City)
Rezone (County)
/ .
Tentative Subdivision Map
Tentative Parcel Map TPM NO. 18431 6-31-85 YES
Major Use Permit
Other NEGATIVE DECLARATIQ.'1 LeG NO. 85-8-25 5-16-85 YES
~ R T:l\ NC'F, OL 88-008 10-18-88 YES
87-155 TPM/TIME EXTENSION 87-155 10-1(3-(3(3 yr:;::i
----
3. If no development is planned at this time, will approval of the proposed jurisdic-
tional change increase the development potential of the property? N/A
(If so, please indicate in terms of allowable uses, and number of units.)
4. If development is not planned at this time, when is development of the area antici-
pated? N/ A '
2
'"
. .
* 5. In as much detail as possible, please explain. why this proposal is necessary at this
time (e.g., an approved development or an existing structure requires service not
currently provided or available).
EXISTING DWELLING UNIT ON PARCEL 2 IS SERVED BY SEPTIC SYSTEM.
APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP REQUIRES ANNEXATION INTO THE
CARDIFF SANITATION DIS1RICT.
B. GENERAL INFORMA nON
* 1. Please describe the general location and physical features of the territory which is
the subject of this proposal. Refer to major highways, roads, watercourses, and
topographical features.
1.23 ACRES ABUTTING NORTH SIDE OF MANCHESTER AVENUE APPROXIMATELY
985 FT. EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL. EXISTING TOPCGRAPHY SLOPES TO THE
SOUTH. PARCEL 1 IS UNDEVELOPED, PARCEL 2 IS FULLY DEVEIDPED.
* 2. How many acres of territory are included in this proposal? 1.23 x
* 3. How many people live within the subject territory? 4 x.
* 4. How many registered voters live within the subject territory? 4 x.
-
C. LAND USE INFORMATION
C Z' For County general plan and zoning information call 565-5981. If subject area is within
o. O~~~g SOBla city, call that city's planning department.,
Info. -.,I
*
1. County .
a. Is the territory within a county community planning area? X':,
If so, which one?
b. What is the County General Plan or community planning area designation?
x.
c. What is the existing County zoning? x.
* --2. City
Contact
affected city a. Is the territory within a citYn~eneral plan area? YES
If so, which city? EN I lTAS V
b. What is the city's land-use designation? #3 RESIDENTIAL 2 D.U./AC.
c. Has any city zoned or prezoned the territory? YES
If so, which city? ENCINITAS
d. How is the territory zoned or prezoned? RS 2
3
I
* 3. How is the lÎtory presently used (e.g., vacant; Jves; 3 single-family residences,
etc)? Please be specific as to structures, impro~ements, facilities now on property.
PARCEL 1 - UNDEVELOPED
PARCEL 2 - EXISTING RENTAL TRIPLEX TO BE CONVERTED TO SINGLE
* 4. FAMJLY ~mG ~T BEFORE' BUIWING PERMIT CAN BE GRANTED
How are a Jacent an s us . TO PARCEL 1 .
North: S.F. DWELLING
East: S.F. DWELLING
South: UND EVEID P ED
West: S. F. DWELLING
* 5. Does any portion of the subject territory contain any of the following:
Agricultural Land Uses NO Flood Control Channel NO
Agricultural Preserve NO Ri ver or Creek NO
Scenic corridor zone NO lOa-year flood line NO
Open Space Easement NO Coastal bluff NO
Airport noise contour NO A rchaeo I og i ca I/h is to rica I
Coastal permit zone YF'.S features NO
Sewer Moratorium area NO Other unusual features
Slopes greater than 25% NO (specify) NO
Mature Trees YF'.S
III. PUBLIC SER VICES INVENTORY
A. SEW AGE DISPOSAL
1. Public Sewer System
.
a. Is the subject territory within a district or city that provides public sewer
service? No . If so, what agency? N/ A
.
b. Is annexation for sewer service necessary? Yes
(If No, skip to ~uestion # 2 (Septic System». If yes, what district or city?
* CARDIFF SAN I ATION
* c. What is the distance for connection to the agency(ies) existing sewer system?
620 FT.
---
d. Has the affected agency issued a letter of sewer availability? N/A
If yes, provide a copy of the letter with your application.
e. Will the agency be prepared to furnish service immediately? If not, explain.
Yes
No
f. Is the territory in a sewer moratorium area?
4
.. - .. --- -- - -
...." ...., "....' ", ",..." -..,
\ . .
Is the subject territory to be annexed to ~n improvement district? No
g.
* h. Specify any improvements (on and off site) that will be necessary to connect
and serve the anticipated development. Indicate the total cost of these
improvements and nftthod of financing (e.g., general property tax, assessment
district, landowner or devclopçr fees).
$76,000 TO CONNECT TO EXISTING SEWER PAID BY LANOOWNER
1. Capacity of Treatment Facility:
(1) What is the physical design capacity of the sewage treatment plant which
will serve the annexation area? MGD.
(2) What is the current average daily sewage treatment volume of wastewater
being treated at the plant? MGD.
(3) Does the affected agency currently have sufficient capacity to service the
terri tory? Yes . If not, what plan does the agency have to
increase its capacity?
J. Capacity of Transmission Lines:
(I) What is the physical design capacity of the affected sewer main (trans-
mission line o~ pipeline) which con veys wa~tewa ter to. the trea~ment
facility? Van es MGD. Adequate capacl ty for thlS prOJec .
(2) What is the current loading rate of the sewer main? Varies MGD.
(3) Does the affected agency currently have'sufficient capacity in its sewer
main to serve the territory? Yes . If not, what plan does the agency
have to increase its capacity?
k. Capacity of Outfall Lines:
(1) What is the physical design capacity of the affected outfall line which
-.... conveys treated effluent to the ocean or ocean outfall system? VariesMGD.
Adequate capacity for this project.
(2) What is the current loading rate of the outfall line? Varies MGD.
(3) Does the affected agency currently have sufficient capacity in the outfall
line to serve the territory? Ypc; If not, what plan does the
agency have to increase its capacity?
5
, . . .. '" '," ',' ',"" ",,""." " ,,' ",", ..," ~~.
r
2. Septic Syste:
* a. Is a septic system(s) currently uscd on the' property? YES
* b. Will septic system be used upon annexation and development of the property?
NO .;
* c. If 2.b. is answered yes, please ~nswer the following:
(I) Have percolation tests been conducted?
(2) Dept. of Public Health approval?
B. WATER SUPPLY
I. Is the subject territory within a district or city that provides water service? YES
a. If so, what district or city? OLIVENHAIN
2. Is annexation for water service necessary? NO
a. If so, what district or city?
3. Is the agency prepared to immediately furnish the necessary service?
If not, explain.
4. Is water service currently provided to the territory? YES
a. If so, what is the current water demand? 660 ~ GPD
(1) For what purpose? OOMESTIC
5. Will the project be connected to an existing water lint? PRESENTLY CONNEÇTED
a. Distance to tie-in .
b. When wiII service be extended to territory? .
c. The total anticipated water demand will be:
(1) Residential use MGD.
--- (2) Industrial/Commercial use MGD.
(3) Agricultural use MGD.
6. Is the subject territory to be annexed to an improvement district? NO
a. If so, which one(s)?
-
7. Specify any improvements (on and off site) that will be necessary to connect and
serve the anticipated development. Indicate the total cost of these improvements
and method of financing (e.g., general property tax, assessment district, landowner
or developer fees). NONE REQUIRED
6
.., " , .., ,'" . "". ,.", """"'" """"""" '....
. . .
C. FIRE PROTECTION N/A
1. Is the territory currently within a fire district or city?
a. If so, which one?
<I,
2. If not, is annexation for fire prorect,Ïon part of this application?
3. Is structural fire protection necessary?
4. Location of nearest fire station:
a. Esti ma ted response ti me: (Priority)
(Non-priority)
D. POLICE PROTECTION N/A
1. What police agency currently serves this territory?
a. Location of nearest police station?
b. Estimated response time: (Priority)
(N on-priority)
2. What police agency would serve this territory if this jurisdictional change is
approved?
a. Location of nearest police station?
b. Estimated response time: (Priority)
(Non-priority)
E. SCHOOLS N/A
I. Will development on the territory generate any school-age children?
How many:
a. Grades K - 6
- b. Grades 7 - 9
c. Grades 10 - 12
2. What school district(s} is the subject territory within?
3. Are any elementary or secondary schools serving the subject territory operating
above design capacity? If so, which schools?
7
'.. ",
0
F. FLOOD CONTRC N/A
I. Describe the major drainage area within which the subject territory is located:
II,
2. Are there existing flood control facilities on the territory?
If so, describe.
3. If this territory is annexed to a ci ty, has the city planned for improvements to
provide for flood control in the area (on or off site)?
G. TRANSPORTATION N/A
I. Designate the names and types of roads which the project will use for primary and
secondary access (include direct access streets from the project site to the nearest
freeway):
Street Name Tvoe (Right of Way Width) Current level of Service
2. Is widening of an existing street necessary?
3. Is the project served by County-maintained roads? .
4. Is construction of new access streets necessary? - .
5. What is the distance to the nearest shopping center? - miles.
6. Is public transportation available? -- How distant? miles.
IV. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE N/A
A., Is the territory to be annexed or reorganized located within the sphere of influence of
"'the city/district to which it is proposed to be annexed?
B. Will a sphere of influence amendment for any affected agency be required?
Which agency(ies)?
8
'. .......... """""""""""""""'" """"'" ..... ... ""..,..,. .........",.....,..,..".....",..""".,...'.."...".. "'."
. .
V. SPECIAL REVENUES - ANNEXING CITY OR DISTRICT MUST COMPLETE THIS SECTION
A. Docs the city/district have current plans to establish any new assessment districts which
would include this area, in order to pay for new or extended services? Please.detail.
Ii,
No
B. Does the affected territory contain existing commercial activities which generate ten
million dollars per year or more in retail sales? No
C. Will the area assume any existing bonded indebtedness upon annex<ltion to city/district?
Please explain, and indicate taxpayer cost.
Any existing bonded bebt becones the liability of the property owner after
annexation.
D. Will the territory be subject to any new or additional special taxes, benefit charges, or
fees? Please outline.
Annual sewer service charge after connection to the public sewer system.
E. Which service(s) to be provided to the annexing area by your city/district are presently
being provided by another local agency? (please list each service and current provider).
None
F. Is the city/district requesting an exchange of property tax revenues as the result of this
proposal? No
G. Is a master property tax exchange agreement applicable to .this jurisdictional change?
No .
H. If property tax exchange negotiations are necessary, upon receipt of this application all
affected agencies will be notified of this proposal and provided preliminary information to
begin the negotiation process.
-/~ Jj~ t/77~TY ?~#F~
GÎty/District Representative Title
(signature) er9'~-SO'7q
Phone Number
9
1
, .
VI. PUBLIC CaNT At
A. List all agencies, groups, and individuals contacted regarding this proposal.
None
II,
* LAFCO will consider the perSGn signing this application below as the proponent of the proposed
action(s). . Notice and other communications regarding this appiication (including fee payment) will
be di,eeted to the p'~onent: fYú /
S'gnatu,e: ,~d.f/. '.\' _J /(
Da te: /), - / ~ - P I
Print or Type
Name:
Represen ting:
Address:
Phone No.
* If you wish anyone other than the proponent of this application to receive notices and reports of
these proceedings, please include here: .
Name:
Address:
-
(7/07/87)
10
.',, '
. .
vaS-OlOt TPM 18431t Log No. 85-8-25
page 2
May 16t 1985
,
I
I
MITIGATING MEASURES PROPOSED BY APPPLICANT:
None.
REASONS TO SUPPORT FINDING OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
- No sensitive resourc~s would .be impacted; upon annexation all services and
utilities will be available. . -- .-
NOTE: This act ion becomes final upon approval by the appropri ate deci sion-
making body. -
i Additional copies of this Negative Declaration may be obtained at the
I
, Environmental Planning Sectiont DPLUt 5201 Ruffin Roadt San Diegot CA 92123.
:
~;t '¡J~
SON~ ITSON, Chief.
Reg atory Planning
,- --..
Sri :MUE:jcr-:~ _.
u', ..-
cc: Lee Vancet Project Manager
L.V. Schooler, P.O. Box 986, Solana Beach, CA 92075'
O'Day Consultants, 7750 2-H El Camino Real, Car1sbad, CA 92008
,
"".
----- .-., ---- --' .--
,--
- -- -.--.- "---'--'-'--'-'"
. .-..,.. .. . . - o. ' - '-'0- -- '.-- --
- _O~~O-:_: -:~- -.-:-::: .-_..~_.:.~.-~:~-;':: --~o~~ -='-~:::'::-'-=:" _.:. .~.:-:-c.~--::...¿~-= --;:;~~.. '-:.. ~>::_:~':~:.:.c - :':.' - - :_::~-- ':-~.:~~-. -
'-.-""--'- . - ..- - -.-. ' .- 0-- .
r
. COINTY IA:GO
. OF SAN ~~ df ~~ITììrFì1Û~ ~ ~ ~
PI.- send reply to office chec;ked:
0 5201 Ruffin Road, Suite B 0 WALTER C. LADWIG, DIRECTOR 0 334 Vie Vera Cruz
San Diego. CA 92123-1666 5201 Ruffin Road. Suite B San Marcos, CA 92069.2638
(619) 565-3072 San DIego, CA 92123.1566 (619) 741-4236
(619) 565-3001
FINAL DECISION OF THE DIRECTffi ΠPLANNING AND LAND USE
Application Number: V85-070
Name of Applicant: LOUIS V. SCHOOLER
Location of Property: 3703 MANCHESTER AVENUE
Use Regulation: RS-2
Corrmunity: SAN DIEGUITO
DECISION:
1. It is found that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on
the environment and the Negative Declaration dated May 16,1985 has been
considered and is approved.
2. Grant, in substantial accord with the approved plot plan, a variance for a.
reduction in minimum building site area from 0.5 acre to 0.45 acre on
proposed Parcels 1 and 2 in connection with a proposed division of land,
with the condition that the variance not become effective until such time
as the Tentative Parcel Map is recorded.
REASONS: An offsite curve realignment associated with another subdivision has
resulted in the existing private access to this variance applicant's property,
as well as an adjacent lot, having inadequate sight distance to enter Manchester
Avenue safely. The granting of this variance will correct this existing public
safety hazard. The property contains the required gross acreage but due to
necessa1"Y access easement acreage deduction, the net acr~ag~ becomes
subs t and ard.
FINDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 7107 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN SUPPORT OF GRANTING
A VARIANCE:
1. That there are except ional or extraordinary circllßstances or conditions
appl icable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property
that do not apply generally to the property or cl ass of use 'in the sëIl1e
vicinity and zone.
Facts In Support: The property contains the required gross acreage but due
to necessary access easement acreage deduction, the net acreage becomes
subs t and ard. Furthermore, an existing serious sight distance problem
occurs at the present access point to this and the adjacent property.
. .
Schooler -2- V85-0l0
2. That granting the variance or its modification is necessary for the
preserv at i on and enjoyment of a substantial property ri ght possessed by
other properties in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property
for which the variance is sought.
Facts In'Support: Other properties in this same vicinity possess adequate
sight distance and safe access to and from Manchester Avenue. Granting of
this variance will alleviate an existing serious sight distance problem,
thereby resulting in the enjoyment of a right presently not experienced.
3. That granting the variance or its modification will not be materi~ly
detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or injurious to the
property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is
located.
Facts In Support: The granting of this variance will reduce, if not
eliminate, an existing and serious sight distance problem on Manchester
Avenue.
Because the proposed division of land must meet all health and safety
requirements imposed by the County, granting the vari ance will not be
materially detrimental to public health and safety.
4. That granting the variance or its modification will not be incompatible
with the San Diego County General Plan.
Facts In Support: As granted, the variance will not be incompatible with
the San Dieguito Community Plan as the proposed subdivision meets the gross
lot area requirement of the plan.
.
EXPIRATION DATE: This variance has no expirõtion date.
If you are dissatisfied with the decision of the Director of Planning and land
Use or the conditions of approval, you may appeal to the Board of Planning and
Zoning Appeals. Any such appeal shall be filed with the Secretary of the Board
in the Office of the Zoning Administrator within ten (10) days of, the date of
this notice AND MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A FILING FEE OF ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE
DOLLARS ($165.00).
..
(
.' . .
Sc hoo 1 er -3- V85-070
I certify that the foregoing decision was approved by the Director of Planning
and land Use on June 13,1985. A copy of this decision is on file in the office
of the Department of Planning and land Use and a copy was mailed to the
applicant at the address shown on the application.
BY: DATE: August 7, 1985
ROBERT E. ASHER, CHIEF
REA: SA:jr
16/01-84
'.
"
, ¡fiE&.. PéC. ~tÇ - lac: 4- - ~
CO~TY OF SAN DIIGO . r,,!.2 '.\.\~~~ ~.
~rrltliìfll~""lt @f fP!~""""ï~ ~ IL<§J~ llt~ 11
Plp58 send reply to office checked:
0 5201 Ruffin Road, Sui:e B "\'VAL TEA C LADWIG, DIRECTOR n 334 Via Vera Cruz
San Diego. CA 92123.16ô6 ~ 5201 Ruffin Road, Suite B ~ San Marcos. CA 92069-2638
!619) 565-3072 San DIego, CA 92123,1666 (619) 741,4236
i619) 565-3001
May 16, 1985
TO: DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND LAND USE
FROM: - ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
RECOMMENDED FINDING OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION: Va5-0l0, TPM 18431, Log No.85-8-25
L.V. Schooler/San Dieguito
FINDING:
The Environmental Planning staff has examined the Initial Study below and is
recommending that the proposed project will not have significant effect on the
environment, and that an Environmental Impact Report need not be prepared
pursuant to the San Diego County Procedures for Environmental Impact Review,
revised August 1, 1983.
-- I NITIAL STUDY SUMMARY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION:
The project is a minor subdivision of 1.16 acres 'into two' parcels of 0.56 and
0.60 acres gross each, and a variance to allow 0.45 acres lot instead of 0.5
..- acres minimum as required by the Zoning Ordinance. The site is located on
Manchester Avenue, 985 feet east of it1s intersection with El Camino Real, in
the 01ivenhain area. The project proposes annexation to the 01ivenhain
Sanitation District.
THOMAS BROS COORDINATES: 30, B-2 FIELD CHECKED: no ANALYST: M.U. Evans
San Dieguito Comm. Plan #3 Residential 2 dull acres
RS-2 Use Regulation 2 dull acres
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING:
The site is a gentle south-facing slope; parcel 2 contains an existing triplex,
parcell is vacant. The site is vegetated in introduced landscape vegetation;
residential uses exist on the -east and sides.
POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS:
r~one .
-- .-. . .-- -- .. - --- ._. --
. ,
.... -- - . ----.....- --- - ..-. -- .--. _.- _.
--.- .---- -.--.. _n- -_. ----- --.--- .. -----..
. .- --. -. -- -...-.-.- -----..-_.__. ----- _._---,---
-~~...'.' .-. --_. --:. n~ -.-.. ..,'.'."'. .,..=-=--;,.,-_._"-.::..c...-.c::.... .., -.....
... nm. "-- .....-.... . '---'-.' ~--
. . --- ..- "- - .-.. ._-- . .. ...m . .- - .- .._- .. n- .. . .-.. ~-"-' - . - _m__.. -.. ~'='~.- --~_.-
------_. .
- . .
V85-0l0, TPM 18431. Loq No. 85-8-25
page 2
May 16, 1985
MITIGATING MEASURES PROPOSED BY APPPLICANT:
None.
REASONS TO SUPPORT FINDiNG OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
No sensitive resources would be impacted; upon annexation all services and
utilities will be available.
NOTE: This action becomes final upon approval by the appropriate decision-
mak i ng body.
Additional copies of this Negative Declaration may be obtained at the
Environmental Planning Section, DPLU. 5201 Ruffin Road, San Diego. CA 92123.
ft;, . /?~.
SON ~~~ ITSON, Ch i ef
Reg~a~~ry Planning
I -
¡ SPI:MUE:jc~~ --
I cc: Lee Vance, Project Manager
l.V. Schooler, P.O. Box 986, Solana Beach, C~ 92075'
O'Day Consultants, 7750 2-H El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008
os
-- "--~~.- .-- n'-
_.- - - . - -
.- .~. h - .. .. -- -
- -';:- -- - - ~-::- -- -'f=~.=;;;:-=-~ '~--' -', ..~ ~_: ~-_:~:.~. .~- -~- ,'-~~=-c ~ ---~ ~;_:n~~~'. ~-: .--"- :
-==~=~=. _.u. _.__n. --- -- - --... - .-.--- -..
---. _.__n .-. - - -.- ---- -.
. .
RESOLUTION NO. OL-88-008
A RESOLUTION OF THE OLIVENHAIN
COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM
SECTIONS 4810 SETBACKS, AND 4006 & 4200 LOT SIZE
OR AREA, OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 3703 MANCHESTER AVENUE
.
WHEREAS, Louis V. Schooler applieã for a Variance from
sections 4810, 4006 and 4200 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow a
reduction in lot size below the required .50 minimum net acres
requir~d in the RS-2 zone for Parcell from .582 gross acres to
.459 net acres, and for Parcel 2 from .585 gross acres to .482
net acres; and for a reduction in the required 40. from
centerline front yard setback from a less than 40' easement to
23' on Parcel 2 for property of:
All that p~rtion of the West half of the East Half of the
South Half of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of
the Southwest Quarter of section 24, Township 13 South,
Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, County of
San Diego, State of California, according to official plat
thereof, lying Southerly of a line drawn parallel with
and distant 320.00 feet Northerly from the Northerly line
of County Road Survey No. 426, (Manchester Avenue) 40.00
feet wide, a plat of which is on file in the Office of the
County Engineer of San Diego County. EXCEPT therefrom the
East 5.095 feet thereof.
Commonly known as~3703 Manchester Avenue, Encinitas;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the
application 88-274-V on October 18, 1988, by the Olivenhain
Community Advisory Board, at which time all persons desiring to
be heard were heard; and
LN/ In/Cl,B11a -1058wp
-------- ---
. .
WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to
include without limitation:
a. site plan submitted by the applicant;
b. written information submitted with the application;
c. Oral testimony from staff, applicant, and public made
a part of the record at sai¿ public hearing;
d. CAB staff report (88-274-V) dated October 13, 1988,
~ which is on file in the Department of Plannin<; and
Community Development; and
e. Additional written documentation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Olivenhain
Community Advisory Board of the city of Encinitas that:
1. The appl icant 's property is physically special in
contrast to some of the existing lots in the vicinity, since
one of the parcels proposed is enclosed on three sides by
either public or private roads or easements requiring greater
setbacks for structures, and the access easement running east
and west through Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 which resulted in the
reduction of the lot sizes for both parcels was requested by
the County of San Diego to relieve a potentially hazardous
access onto Manchester Avenue from the adjacent easterly
property;
2. The privilege sought by the applicant is consistent
with the limitation upon other properties in the vicinity and
zone, since other properties in the vicinity do not have
streets or easements on three sides of the property and
therefore, may have less restrictive setbacks;
3. The granting of this variance would not authorize a
use that lS not expressly authorized by the zoning
regulations, since the existing triplex on Parcel 2 lS an
existing non-conforming use and structural non-conformity and
a covenant is required to be recorded agreeing to convert the
existing triplex to a single family dwelling unit prior to
issuance of a building permit to construct a single family
dwelling unit on Parcel 1, thereby ensuring that the existing
non-conforming situation is only allowed to remain until a
building permit is requested on Parcel 1, at which time only
one single family dwelling unit will be allowed on each
parcel;.
LN/ln/CAB11a-1058wp
'.
. .
4. The granting of this variance would not grant a
privilege not enjoyed by other property in the vicinity, since
other properties do not have roads or easements on three sides
of the property; the situation was not self-induced since the
county's request for the access easement east and west through
Parcels 1 and 2 resulted in the reduction in net lot size; the
request would not constitute a rezoning, since the lots would
be only slightly below the required .50 net acre lot size; and
would not authorize a public nuisance, since the lots are
ultimately proposed for single family residential use.
.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the application for Variance
88-274-V is hereby APPROVED with the following condition:
1. A covenant is required to be recorded in the office
of the County Recorder, binding to present and future
owners, agreeing to convert the existing triplex on
Parcel 2 to a single family dwelling unit prior to
issuance of a building permit for Parcell.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of October 1988, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Boardmembers Bobbitt, DuVivier, Fernald and Stumpf
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Boardmember Tutoli
ABSTAIN: None
CHUCK DU VIVIER, Vice-Chairman of
the Olivenhain community
Advisory Board
,
ATTEST:
LI DA S. NILES
Assistant Plan. r
LN/ln/CAB11a-1058wp
. ¡:: \ L~
. .
RESOLUTION NO. 89-04
RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT
FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has received a request from
Louis School&r that the hereinafter described territory to be
annexed to the Cardiff Sanitation District (hereinafter referred
to as the Sanitation District); and
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors desires to initiate
proceedings to annex said territory to the Sanitation District;
BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED as follows:
1. Pursuant to Government Code sections 56800 and 56700,
application is hereby made to the Local Agency Formation
Commission of the County of San Diego for a proposed
change of organization as follows:
A. This proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox
Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (S.
56000, et. seq., Govt. Code).
B. The nature of the proposed change of organization
and the names of all districts for which any such
change of organization is proposed as follows: The
annexation of the hereinafter described territory
to the Sanitation District.
C. The names of all other affected counties, cities and
districts are: city of Encinitas.
D. A description of the exterior boundaries of the
territory proposed to be annexed to the Sanitation
District is described in Exhibit "A" hereto
attached. \
E. Said territory is uninhabited and comprises
approximately 1.23 acres.
F. It is proposed that said territory be annexed
subject to the following condition: Payment of
district annexation and State Board fees.
TH/03/245wpS (2-27-89)
,
. .
G. All the owners of land within such territory have
given their written consent to such annexation
subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions.
H. The reasons for this proposal are as follows:
(1) The Sanitation District is empowered to and is
engaged in furnishing sewage disposal
facilities.
(2) The territory proposed to be annexed to said
District is developed and/or proposed to be
developed and used for residential and/or
commercial purposes and provision for sewerage
disposal facilities for said territory is
essential for such purposes.
I. It is hereby requested that proceedings be taken for
the annexation of territory as hereinabove proposed.
J. This annexation is consistent with the sphere of
influence of the Sanitation District.
2. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15074
(California Environmental Quality Act of 1970), the Board
finds that this annexation would not have a significant
effect on the environment (Negative Declaration Log No.
85-8-25).
3. The Clerk of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized
and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution
with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of the County of San Diego.
TH/03/245wp5 (2-27-89)
I
. .
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7 day of March, 1989, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES: Gaines, Hano, Omsted, Shea, Slater
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
~~
P m Slater, President of the Board
Cardiff Sanitation District
ATT~
E. JANE Board
TH/03/245wpS (2-27-89)
I . .Ill£"' :14 S ~ / ~ .~~.J
l ' I~
~
"
,"
, ,
<\J " (f..."\
t
~ r~l ~ )
~~
~ \ (~) ~
V)
~ (~1 ~~\ N I~
~ \))\
(~\
~ ~ 5ðß.l~.'é
;-, Ö-,'
I. ~
" \
""', (?~
~ Crì
r ~,/19 0)
~ ~ /5t!. 7ð" ,f19
~
~ ~ ~"\rk\
~) ~ ~ r¡ t) ()" 'J\'
~ '»)) , PC L. / ,~)~,
1~ ~ ~
~ S) ~ \\
\j ~ ~ ~
-') ~
(J
~ t\
(A"\ PCL. t?
\
((r
~
oS ß.JJ'f'.!J 'tJ 7'c . . ~ ~.9'
IJ1AHëHcc5TER .~ Ave.-. --
I?ð.ß. . .
..
~
PLAT OF P/?OPEIfJT Y TO 8E
ANNE YE.o JlJ CARLJ/FF 5A# /TA77ðAl OI.5TR/CT
. .
. .
PROPOSED ~NNEXATION TO CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT
PETITION OF LOUIS V. SCHOOLER (262-062-20,21,22 )
AREA 1.23 ACRES /ë-/J-&!J
PROPOSED BOUNDRY
, ff!... ~?!!.~ CONSUL ~~~:~L CAMINO REA"" RANOIO LA COSTA
"LANN'N". 'ROCUSIN" CARL58AÐ,CALIFORN'A nool
"""tYIN" 'HONt" 6"~1010
-,- .---
~ARDIFF SANITATION DISTRIJIÞ
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: March 7, 1989
TO @ Warren H. Shafer, District Manager
FROM: ðiFTom Henie, utilities Planner ,~1
VIA: Morton F. August, District Engineer ~ .
~~~ Robert A. Warren, City Engineer
\'
DATE: February 28, 1989
SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution No. 89-04: Application for
Annexation to the Cardiff Sanitation District of 1.23
Acres Abutting North Side of Manchester Avenue,
Approximately 985 Ft. East of El Camino Real - Louis
Schooler
BACKGROUND:
This is a request to annex 1.23 acres into the Cardiff Sanitation
District. Annexation is required in order to provide sewer service
for two future single-family residences.
DISCUSSION:
There is currently one triplex on the existing 1.23 acre lot which
is served by a subsurface sewage disposal system. Tentative Parcel
Map 18431 divides this lot into two parcels of 0.56 and 0.60 acres
gross, each, and requires the existing triplex to be converted to
a single-family dwelling on parcel two. The remaining parcell is
zoned for one future single family dwelling. Annexation to the
Cardiff Sanitation District is a condition of final map approval
and it is staff's consensus that the above mentioned abatement
(triplex conversion) be completed prior to final annexation.
This parcel is within the district sphere of influence and is
located on the north side of Manchester Avenue, approximately 985
ft. east of El Camino Real (see attached vicinity and district
boundary map).
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is recommended that the Board of Directors:
1. Certify pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, section 15074
(California Environmental Quality Control Act of 1970), that
this project would not have a significant effect on the
environment (Negative Declaration Log No. 85-8-25).
2. Adopt Resolution of Application Number 89-04 for annexation
to the district.
3. Require conversion of existing triplex to a single family
dwelling prior to final annexation of property to the
district.
TH/04/CM8-1425wp5 1(2-28-89-1)
. .
- -
"
I.l
4..~Þ ,
~ ~ ~ SIT£.
D£'. ~ .~
t\
\1\, ~
~
<: ~
.
N
~
VICINITY MAP
NOT- TO SCALE
SCHOOLER ANNEXATION
CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT
..' ¡VEc:., PéC. . ~tÇ -/004- - l-
.,., COlliTY OF SAN oA;o 1«.2. '3.\~s -
., :" ~ ,." ~p~rr[m~líîì~ @~ fiì>1~líîìlíîìü~ ~ ~~Ul]dJ llt~ 11
PI.ase Mnd reøly to cHic. checked:
0 5201 Rutfln Ro:Jd. Sui:~ 9 r: WALTER C. LADWIG. DIRECTOR 0 334 ViII Vera Cruz .
S~n Diego. C~ 92123.16õõ - 5201 Muffin Road. Suite 8 San Marcos. CA 92069.2638
- (619) 565.3072 S~n Dle<;o. C~ 921::3-1666 (6191741.4236
1619) 565.3001
~1ay 16, 1985
TO: DIRECTOR, DEPART~ENT OF PLANNING AND LAND USE
FROM: - ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
RECOMMENDED FINDING OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION: V3S-0l0, TPM 18431, Log No.85-8-25
L.V. Schooler/San Dieguito
FINDING:
I
I
I. The Environmental Planning staff has examined the Initial Study below and is
.- recommending that the proposed project will not have significant effect on the
environment, and that an Environmental Impact Report need not be prepared
pursuant to the San Diego County Procedures for Environmental Impact Review,
revised August 1, 1983.
-. .. -". = INITIAL STUDY. SUMMARY
- -
- PROJECT~DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: ". -'..
The project is a minor subdivision of 1.16 acres into two' parcels of 0.56 and
0.60 acres gross each, and a variance to allow 0.45 acres lot instead of 0.5
.-;- -- acres min;mlJl1 as required by the Zoning Ordinance. The site is located on
Manchester. Avenue, 985 feet east of it's intersection with E1 Camino Real, in
the 01 ivenhain area. The project proposes annex at ion to the 01 ivenha;n
Sanitation District.
THOMAS BROS COORDINATES: 30; B-2 FIELD CHECKED: no ANALYST: M.U. Evans
San Diegu;to Comm. Plan #3 Residential 2 du/1 acres
RS-2 Use Regulation 2 du/1 acres
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING:
The site is a gentle south-facing slope; parcel 2 contains an existing triplex,
Darcel 1 is vacant. The site is vegetated in introduced landscape vegetation;
residential uses exist on the east and sides.
POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS:
:Üj n r: .
.- --. -. -- --
--_.. -- .- -'. '.-.. . - ~.,.. - -" - .-
-- -. .-.. ... .. .. ""-----..-"".'-'" ...-.. -.-----.... 'c,.... -'--...- -- . .-. .---.--- ..--.- -. --
::-:-~-:-"'-'~:~: '~~-:.:.=--...::.._:~....:..:.- !::.c:.".- - --- .... _o:_';':~:--'-7:'_':;'.:c...ò --::".- ...:.:_- .~~~--::-- --:----
- _.. ..... . .-.
.' _.
..
'!T~'... . .
. ,..
vaS-O70, TPM 18431, Log No. 85-8-25
page 2
May 16, 1985
I
I
I MITIG~ING MEASURES PROPOSED BY APPPl!CA~:
None.
REASONS TO SUPPORT FINDING OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
-- No sensitive resourc~s would be impacted; upon annexation all services and
- utilities will be available. - -. -- --
NOTE: This action becomes final upon approval by the appropriate decision-
mak i ng body. -
i Additional copies of this Negative Declaration may be obtained at the
¡ Environmental Planning Section, DPLU, 5201 Ruffin Road, San Diego, CA 92123.
,
,
I- -
;- ~}t ~I?~-
I SON~~1'f ITSON, Chi ef -
: Regtf a~~ry P 1 ann i ng
-- _.
. --_:...- SPI :MUE:jcr-"::' ----::.:....::..
cc: Lee ~ance, Project Manager
L.V. Schooler, P.O. Box 986, Solana Beach, CA 92075-
OIDay Consultants, 7750 2-H El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008
.
;s-
- .---- -- '--'-----' .--
-------'-..- "" --- -.-. --.. -- ._-- -.-- '--"--- - , ------
-"'--' -- '--' '--. ----'---"-' - ""-'--. --"--'---
--. .---. .-.- . --- ... .. . .. -----,
.---=;:"===~"---~~":::-~" ,u'-. ,h ..--=:~'~~::~~- =:~.~':' .:.:.-=-:-:--,~:-::.=: ~~~,-~- -. ::-::;',"'--c ~---=- - ~- '. - :.?-~~-=- -. --==.
". -..... -
r
. .
TO: Board of Directors
* CARDIFF Sanitation District
* The undersigned property owners* in the vicinity of MANCHESTER AVFN()F,
in the unincorporated territory of the County of San Diego respectfully request
and consent to the commencement of proceeding for the annexation of the property
* described opposite our names to the CARDIFF Sanitation District
* and further consent to this annexation subject to any and all regulations~fees,
and/or charges established under the provisions of existing CARDIFF
Sanitation District ordinances.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED
Please sign State Lot, Block, Subdivision's name
and Map No. or Section, Township and ASSESSOR'S
DATE NAME AND ADDRESS Range or Address of Property.* PARCEL NO.
*
12-9-88 LOUIS V. SCHOOLER W ~ of E ~ OF ~ ~ OF ~ R ~ ~~ ~ 262 OG2
P.O. POX 986 sw J..:r OF TI-W. SW ~ OF ~R(, ?4 'T'n~ 20,21,22
. .
SOLANA BEACH, CA. 92075 R4W. SAN BERNARDTNO RA~F'. ANn MP.RH)AN,
COUNTY OF S.D., STATE OF C'.A., T.YTN('., ~ 'T,Y
OF A LINE DRAWN PARAU ,RT , WITH AND DISTAN'r
.
320.00 FEET N'LY FROM THE N'LY LINE OF COUNTY
ROAD SURVEY NO. 426 (MANCHESTER AVE.). EXCEPT
THEREFROM THE EAST 5. 095 FEET THEREOF.
)jj;Æ
* /2 -/.? ~¡g.
SIGNATU~/t1 '. ... . LA / DATE: , .i
V
. .
*1f property is in escrow, please note the approximate date of completion of escrow.
Please return petition to:
. . (' ,"
~- -
Phone
. .
* Date 12-9-88
Name LOUIS V. SCHOOLER
Address P.O. BOX 986
SOLANA BEACH, CA. 92075
* As the proponent(s) for this annexation of property
identified as 262-067-70 71 77 to the
Assessor's Parcel Number(s)
CARDIFF SANITATION District, I understand and agree
that annexing into the District does not guarantee sewer -
service or commit sewer capacity to the subject property
being annexed. Also, the District by accepting the
application does not represent that it will provide any
treatment plant expansions or sewer line extension to
provi de capaci ty or servi ce for the subject a rea to be
annexed. Acceptance of this application and final
annexation of the property only allows the property to
be served at such time as the owner(s) of the annexed
property pay all necessary costs for the sewerage
facilities which can transport, treat and dispose of the
wastewater generated by the property. This may mean the
proponent(s) shall pay for a part or all of the required
facilities to serve the property.
f
. /
* //
2/2-012 .