1994-670546
. . . - ' .
~ ...~, ,,'~.'~
1671 .
, .
.
. t
" !
" r.
t,.~
í~r)
'v' t/"
; I.
0)1
\ ~ /
\:J
, ~
.
j ,
~/
.
DOC U 1994-0670546 .
lB-HOU-1994 02=52 PM
OFFICIAL RECORDS
SAN DIEGO COONTY RECORDER'S (ffICE
GREGORY 5nITH, COUNTY RECORDER
FEES: 0.00
~ I: C E , Y F fDJ
Dt:.C - 9 I~':;.,
SAN DIEGO I.AFCO
.- 'r'~' "~'.
,.. .", . .3
.., , SAN DIEGO COUNTY Please return to:
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION LAFCO
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION MS A216
"Ivana Stamegna Annexation'! to @
Enclnltas Sanitary District
DA91.31 Pursuant to Government Code Sections 57200 and 57201, this Certificate is hereby
issued.
The name of each city and/or district included in this change of
organization/reorganization, all located within San Diego county, and the type of, change
of organization ordered for each city and/or district are as follows:
~ Type of Change of OrganiDtiQQ
Encinitas Sanitary District Annexation
A certified .copy of the resolution ordering this change of organization/reorganization
without an election, or the resolution confirming an order for this change of
organization/reorganization after confirmation by the voters is attached hereto and by
reference incorporated herein.
A legal description and map of the boundaries of the above-cited change of
organization/reorganization are included in said resolution.
The terms and conditions, if any, of the change of organization/reorganization are
indicated on the attached form.
I hereby certify that I have examined the above-cited resolution for a change of
organization/reorganization, and have found that document to be in compliance with the
- Commission's resolution approving said change of organization/reorganization.
I further certify that (1) resolutions agreeing to accept a negotiated exchange of property
tax revenues for this jurisdictional change, adopted by ,the local agencies incl""ded in the
negotiations, have been submitted to this office, or (2) a master property tax exchange
agreement pertinent to this jurisdictional change is on file.
'~
Date: November 9,1994
MICHAEL D. OlT '
Executive Officer
. . . 1664
..
" .
..
.'
LAFCO 1600 Pacific Highway. Room 452
San Diego, CA 92101 . (619) 531-5400
San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission
CERTIFICAlE RE: lERMS AND CONDffiONS AND INDEBlEDNESS
Chairperson
John Sasso Subject: "Ivano Stamegna Annexation" to the Cardiff Sanitation District
President, Borrego
Water District (Ref. No. DA91-31)
Members
Brian P. Bilbray Certain terms and conditions are required by the Local Agency Formation
County Board of
Supervisors Commission to be fulfilled prior to the completion of the above-named
Dr. Lillian Keller Childs change of organization
Helix Water District .
Linen Fromm
Public Member
Mark J. Loscher I ¡; ~/Jd', g I f chP/.¡ ~ /IJ Þ.VJA91l /1J P /1/ fJ /If) Iv s :I
Vice Mayor, City of
San Marcos
John MacDonald (Name) (Title)
County ,Board of
Supervisors do hereby certify that the terms and conditions listed below have been fully
Joan Shoemaker
Mayor, City of met.
El cajon
Abbe Wolfsheimer
CounciImember, City of 1. Payment by the property owner of district annexation fees and State
San Diego
Alternate Members Board of Equalization charges.
Bruce Henderson
Councllmembcr, City of
SanDicgo
Ernest Kotnik
San Miguel Consolidated
Fin: Protection District
Leonard M. Moore
Mayor Pro 1èm, City of
Chula Vista
David A, Perkins Will the affected property be taxed for any existing bonded indebtedness or
Pubbc Member contrLral obligation?
Leon L. Williams
County Board of Yes No - If yes, specify.
Supervisors
Executive Officer tV MlcúL .¿JC~~
Jane P. Merrill
Counsel
LlQyd M. Harmon, Jr. Signature
~ !j9y
ate
,
~
^ -~
..~
. ... . .
.'" 1665
RESOLUTION NO. 91-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE ENCINITAS SANITARY DISTRICT
ANNEXING TERRITORY TO WHICH OWNERS HAVE CONSENTED
"IVANO 'STAMEGNA ANNEXATION"
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985 (Govt. Code, Section 5600 et seq.)
- preliminary proceedings were commenced by resolution of
application by this Board on July 9, 1991, as Resolution No.
91-06, for annexation the Encinitas sanitary District
(thereinafter referred to as the District) of certain territory
therein described,' which description has been modified pursuant
to the directions of the Local Agency Formation Commission; and
WHEREAS,the annexation proposed by said resolution of
\ application was presented to and approved by the Local Agency
Formation Commission of San Diego County on October 7, 1991, and
this District was designated as the conducting District and
authorized by resolution of order said annexation without notice
or hearing and without an election pursuant to Government Code,
section 56837;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, ORDERED AND DETERMINED,
- pursuant to Government Code Section 57025 etseq.;
a. The manner in which and by whom preliminary proceedings
were commenced was by resolution of application by this
Board as stated above.
b. The territory to be annexed has been designated DA
91-31 by the Local Agency Formation Commission, and the
exterior boundaries of such territory are as
hereinafter described.
'-'
\ I /to
Boo..., 'p... I.
. ", . .
." 1666
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of November, 1991, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Davis, Hano, Ornsted, Slater, Wiegand.
NAYS: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
- J11~ w~~
Maura Wiegand, esident of the Board
Encinitas Sanitary District
ATTEST:
(Í?rf
Clerk of the Board
,
-
-'
BoolI' I . .... I. /~I
.. . .
". 1667
..'
I, E. Jane Pool, Clerk of the Board of Directors of the Encinitas
Sanitary District of Encinitas, California, do hereby certify under
penalty of perjury that the attached and foregoing is a true and
correct copy of this document on file in my office. In witness
whereof I have set my hand and the Seal of the Encinitas Sanitary
District this:
gfffA day of ,193!i
of the Board
-
I
--.
,..", ","'~-,- '~
. ... . .. 1668
. .'
\
- c. The territory, proposed to be annexed is uninhabited,
and will be benefitted by such annexation as described
in Health and Safety Code section 4830.
. d. The. reasons for the proposed annexation as set forth in
the resolution of application referred to above are:
.
1. The District is empowered to and is engaged in
furnishin9 sewage disposal facilities.
2. The territory proposed to be annexed to said
District is developed and/orproposed to be
developed and used for residential and/or
- commercial purposes and provision for sewage
disposal facilities for said territory is
essential for such purposes.
e. The terms and conditions of the proposed annexation
are: Payment of annexation and State Board fees.
f. All the owners of land within such territory have given
their written consent to such annexation, ~s provided
in Government Code, Section 56837'; and therefore, as
approved and authorized by the Local Agency Formation
Commission, this Board may adopt its resolution,
ordering the annexation without notice and hearing and
without an election, as provided in Government Code,
section 57002.
g. The regular County assessment role will be utilized and
the affected territory will be taxed for existing
bonded indebtedness.
h. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15074
(California Environmental Quality Act of 1970), the
Board finds that this annexation would not have a
negative effect on the environment.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that pursuant to
- Government Code section 57002, the following described
incorporated territory in the City of Encinitas, State of
California, be and it hereby is annexed to and made a part of the
Encinitas Sanitary District.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Board
immediately transmit a certified copy of this resolution along
with a remittance to cover the fees required by the Government
Code section 54902.5 to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency
Formation commission of San Diego County, so that the Executive
Officer may make the filings ,required by Chapter 8 (commencing
with Section 57200), Part 5, Division 1, Title 6 of the
Government Code and by Chapter 8 (commencing with section 54900),
Part ,1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code.
8o0k' I . -..., 16¿
,
..~.~'"' ,. . ~,..
" ----- - - .
, .,. .
~.
1669
DA91-31 "IVANO STAMEGNA ANNEXATION..
TO THE ENCINITAS SANITARY DISTRICT
That portion of Lot 4 in Block "W" of SEASIDE.' GARDENS ANNEX, in the
City of Encinltas, County of San Diego, State of California,
acco::-ding to Map thereof No. 1801, filed in the office of the
County Recorder "of San Diego County, August 6, 1924, described as
follows:
,
1) ',Commencing at the Northwesterly corner of said Lot ~.
- 2) Thence along the Northerly line of ~aid Lot ',South 89°
30' 30" Eas':, 21~.00 feet to the ~RUE ?OINT Of BEGINNING.
3) :'hence eor.':inuing along said Nor':her~y line, South 89°
30' 30" East, 372.29 feet to a poin~ on a line that l.S
200.00 fee~ ~es~erly of and parallel ~ith~he Westerly
side line o~ Ocean View Avenue as shown on said Map No.
~801.
4) Thence Southerly along said parallel line, South 04° 28'
40" East, 300:00 feet to the Northerly line of Lot 5 ln
:Sloe}: ilK" of said Map No:- <1.801. .
5) Thence Westèrly along said Northerly line, North 89° 30'
30" West; 398.32 feet to a point ~hat is 80.00 feet
Easterly of the Southwest corner of ,said Lot ~,
6) Thence North 00°" ~9 I 59" East, 300.00 feet to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINKING.
-
Exh i bit A
Page 1 of 1
Approved by the local Agency Format' '
Com ' , Ion
, mISSIon 01 San Diego,-
OCT 7 1991
~) , Boo.' / .--" /6 '3.
" ., IIJ./-"U- .
~ odC--
)
,
-"!\""",,C "",",C,,",,"
. - ')~ .
' . ""
..
~
~
1670
~ . ,
oCEAN
~Pf'OVed by the local Aaency F
......... CommlSlion of San Die&u
provtd by the Loc8I A¡ency Formation @
CommtøIOn of SIn Dieøo "38~;;
OCT 7 1991 1" JY1 <¡ ,I\i
~~
~.
~
0 @ @)
\~
~ 3.JOAC
"
~
~ paR. 8LK. W "1.
~.. 5 '-
c
~ 1~
~' .
~ /
ø /Œ;
O. 54 AC 0.5S,
/
@ / "
@
.:127.5.3 /77.7j -
(ENCIN liAS
SUNSET . .
~ IV .2:J".79'w.
ø
-
'0
65C.
DATE: ;\ ;.:, ¿~ '- ((';, PLAT MAP LAF 0:
6-21~91 ' \' .', t': . ~'J DA 9 1- 3 1
SCALE: '-0' ~ .
:, , - : ¡ , AREA:
NONE 'JU 2.6
EXIST. DrST.. ~1 - IVANO STAMEGNA ANNEXATION A.P.N,
BOUND .I~ ., ð, )..f~ ,;4 ,. ~ TO - 256-411-25
. Iloe 0,,/,>...>,.-....... ..,y"",
,t.J U ENCINITAS SANITARY DISTRICT HOH1\S BROS:
" BOUND. P . 24 D-
f
¡ I
!
. .
. . '
v ~
Minute Item: 9
Ref. No.: DA91-31
RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMI$SION
OF 'DIE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING THE
"IVANO STAMEGNA ANNEXATION' TO THE
ENCINITAS SANITARY DISTRICT
if;
On motion of Commissioner, Fromm, seconded by 'Commissioner K()tnik, the
following reSolution is ad()pted: '
WHEREAS, aresollltion of applicatioI1 was submitted to t];¡is CommissioJ:'1for
annexation of territory toth~ Encinitas Sanitary District, which resolution was adòpt~d by
the Board of Directors of said District asl.{es()luti()U No, 91-06, dated July 9, 1991,putsuant
to TitleS, Division3, commencingwith~ctionS6000 of the Govenunent Code; and
WHEREAS, the territory proposed for' annexation.is as described in the, application
onfile with the Local Agency Formation CommiS$ion;and' . ,
WHEREAS, the Executive Officer of the Commission b,as filed her report 'on said
annexation, which report Was received~ndconsideied by' the èòmmission; and
WHEREAS,aJ.l owners of land have consented in writing to the annexation;
NOW TaEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, . that , thisÇotmnissiol'l h~reby finds,
determines, and orders as follows:
(1) The Cotmni$sion certifies that ithas reviewed and considered tbe ¡nf°rIl1ation
cont~ined in the Negative Declaratinn prepared by the City of Encinitas. .
(2) TheCommissionher~by approves the a.nne~tion with modified boundaries,
as descri1>e4 in Exhibit A attached, hereto, subject to tije' following condition:
Paymet1.tby 'theprnperty owner of district annexation fees and State
Bo~d, of EqualiZåtion charp.
(3) The boundaries of tb~ territory as describeijin~Exbibit A are definite aI1d
certain.
(4) The ijoun<laries of the territory dn çonfonn to lipes of ,assessment ',' and
ownership.
.
.. .. . .
(5) The <Jistrict is a registered-voter district,
(6) The territory includes 2.66 acres and is uninhabited.
(7) The ,territory pr()posed for annexation is hereby . designated the "Ivano
StamegnaAnnexation" to the En,cini~ Sanitary District.
(8) The Comn:rission hereby designates the Encinit~ Sanitary District as the
conducting authority and authorizes the Board of Directors to conduct proceedings' in .¡)
compliance with this resolution without notice and hearing"
(9) The Executive Officer is. hereby authorized and directed to mail certified
copies of this resolution as provided in Section 5,685~ of the Government COde.
.
2
I
,
. .
<. . .
Passed and adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the
County of San Diego th~$ 7th day of October , 19 91 ,by
the following vote:
.
AYES: Commissioners MacDonald., Loscher, Shoemaker;
Wolfsh~imeri Kotnik, Sasso, and Fromm
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioners Bilbray and Keller èhilds
ABSTAINING: None
----------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) 55
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO)
.
I, JANE P. MERRILL, Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Com-
.
mission of the County of San Diego, state of California, hereby certify
that I have compared the foregoing copy with the original resolution
adopted by said Commission at its regulç¡r meeting on October 7", 1991
, which original resolution is now on file in my office; and
that same contains a full, true, and correct transcript therefrom and
of the whole thereof.
..
Witness my hand this '25th day of October , 19 91 .
I
..
~Ii~,~
JANE. M£RRILL
Executive Officer
San Diego county Local Agency
Formation Commission
-,
. '
. .
<. ' . .
THE SAN DIEGO
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
HAS ADOPTED A RESOLUTION APPROVING
1HE "IV ANO STAMEGNA ANNEXATION" TO THE
ENCINITAS SANITARY DISTRICf
The following filings to be made after the conducting authority has ordered the change( s )
of organization [boundary change( s )] must be processed by the LAFCO office:
1, County Recorder
2. County Assessor
3. County Surveyor
4. County Auditor
5. State Board of Equalization
Any other filings remain the responsibility of the conducting authority. Proceedings must
be initiated within 35 days after adoption of the Commission's res.olution, and completed
within one year after LAFCO approval, or the proposal must be considered abandoned
(Government Code Sections 57001 and 57002),
Hyour Board/Council adopts a resolution/ordinance ordering the boundary change(s), the
following materials must be forwarded to the lAFCO office:
1. Six (6) certified copies of the resolution/ordinance, . ,
~ with original signatures on each certification page.
2. Certificate Re: Terms and Conditions and Indebtedness (use attached form). Please
return signed, original copy.
3. State Board of Equalization fee in the amount of $ 160 (make checks payable to
"State Board of Equalization"), NO1E: Filings received in the LAFCO oMce after
November 15 and to be filed by December 31 must inelude an additional 10%, as
required by Section 3(f) 01 the State Board 01 Equalization Schedule of ProcessiDg
Fees etrective July 1, 1984.
The Executive Officer will check all documents for compliance before fi1in~ are made.
Amendments to the lAFCO resolution, including boundary modifications, can only be made
by the CoQ1mj~n. All documents recorded and copies of letters of acknowledgment will
be returned to the conducting authority.
H you need additional information, or require further assistance, please call the
Commission's office at (619) 531-5400.
,
£è:. f ~ LA- October 18. 1991
J . P. MERRILL, Executive Officer Date
\
.. . .
.
CITY OF BNCINITAS
NmATIVE DECLARATION
CaS8 NnmhArs 88-196 'DI/ETA and 89-197 DR
Project Title
Prcprty LacatM wast of OC&»ln View B&t~ Union St. ;and Rl1naQ~ Dr.
Location (
15 si11g1a fami1,y ~ Al1hdivisian an 6.9 Acras
Description
Ism ~ J. ,,~n~- . IIV'"..
Project Sponsor
FINDING:
Based upon infoXDBtian provided in the Initial Study, along with
Cœments and Responses to the Notice of Preparation of a Negati va
Declaratiœ which bave been presented to the p]aJtt1i ng Camússion, City
of Encinitas, at a duly called meeting on May 16, 1991, the ccmnission
f~s tbat the project will not bave a significant effect œ ~
envJ.ronment .
MITIGATION IŒASURBS:
Mitigation measures included in the project as a cooditiœ of project
approval to avoid potentially significant effects include:
A copy of the Initial Study bas been attached to substantiate the
finding. ~~~~
~/2//11 ~ ,(, ~ ~-ù..
Date Mayor, City CO\mCil
ChairnBn, Planning cœmissiœ
Chainnan, Ccmmmity Advisory Board
City of Encinitas
,-, ",;.-,', ,','" -, -.',.,"'" '"", ",",CO' """""""~.:'T"",,,"'~""' "'C'" 'h "";"-,,"',, -,;,'; ",-,...",.,',C".'.,.~"......","""
..-
. . .
.
.
"
, APPENDIX I
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKIlST FORM
(To Be Completed :By Lead Agency)
I. Background
1. Name of Proponent Ivano Stam~¡na
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent
15342 ÐawthOUle Boulevar~
Lawndale. . CA 90260
3, Date of Checklist Submitted March U990
4, Agency Requiring Checklist . , .
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Oçean View SubdiYi&jon
ll. Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.)
~ ~ t!Q
1. Barth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in .
geologic substructures? - _ ..x
b. Disruptions, displacement, compaction or
overcovering of the soil? ..x.. - -
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features? - _ ..x
d. The destruction, covering or modification of
any unique geologic or physical features? - _ ..x
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils, either on or off the site? - _ ..x
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or
erosion which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed' of the ocean or
any bay, inlet, or lake? - _ ..x
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? - _ ..x
Page 1 of 7
, , ,< ""',,',,,," , ".,.' ,.-... -- , , '" ,>'. ",- 'J,>'. ", ".-
. . .
I " ~ Maybe li2
2. Air, Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of
ambient air quality? - - -X
b, The creation of objectionable odors? - - -X ,
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally? - _ ..x
3. Water. Will the proposal result in: '
a. Changes in currents, or the course of
direction of water movements, in either
marine or fresh waters? - - -X
b. Changes in absorption' rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of surface .
runoff? ..x.. - -
c. / Alterations to the course or low of flood
waters? - _ ..x
d. Change in the amount of surface water in
any water body? ' - _ ..x
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, including \
but not limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? - _ ..x
f, Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? - - -X
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through' direct additions or
withdrawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations? -Ã.. - -
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public water supplies? - - -X
i. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or tidal
waves? - - -X
Page 20f 7
,"' ".--...,..-" "--" '. - ...."" ". ".'~~"'" ._.".'.---~.~..""~.;.,.,,
. . .
:ïä Maybe H2
4. Plant life, Will the proposal result in:
a, Change in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants? ..x.. - -
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of plants? - _ ..x
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species? ..x.. - -
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
crop? ...x.. - -
5. Animal life, Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in. the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of ¡mima 1~ (birds,
land animals including reptiles, fish and
/ shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? - _ ..x
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? - ..x
c. Introduction of new species of ~nimals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals? ...x.. - -
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? - - ..x
6. . Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels? - _ ...x
b, Exposure of people to severe. noise . levels? - _ ..x
7. Light and Glare, Will the proposal produce new
light or glare? ..x.. - -
8. Land Use, Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area? ..x.. - -
Page 3 of 7
._--,...
!. '., '..- ,,~,.- """' .. "'..,.-. >""."'<""'"""""""""""".""""""""". ".'~~." .._...'"'~-""' ".~,-,-',',,_.",,-,", ."-_.~""".,--,,..."-,,',,_."
. . .
~ Maybe ~
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources? ..x.. - -
10, Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous' substances (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions? - _ ..x
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan? - _ ..x
11. Population. Will Øteproposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate of the human
population of an area? ' ..x.. - -
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing
housing, . or ,create a demand for additional
housing? ..x... - -
13. Transportation/Circuladon. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement? - _ ..x
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or'
demand for new parking? - _ ...x
c. Substantial' impact upon existing
transportation systems? - _ ...x
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and/or goods? ..x... - -
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? - _ ..x
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? - _ ..x
Page 4 of 7
,..,-,_..,--,_.,.._-_.,..,..... -,
,,'-.- -.... ,'.- ','-""" .'. ",-,---, .." .',' , ..,. "....c c'. '." ',--,
. . .
~ Maybe r!2
14, Pq.blic Services. Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the following
areas:
a. Fire protection? - _ ...x ,
b, Police protection? - _ ..x
Co Schools? - _ ...x
d. Parks or other recreational facilities? - _ ...x
e. Maintenance, of public facilities, including
roads? - _ ...x
L Other governmental services? - _ ...x
15, Energy. Will the proposal result in: . .
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? - _ ..x
,
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources or. energy, or require the
development of new sources of energy? - _ ..x
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following utilities: - _ ..x
17, Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)? - - ..x
b, Exposure of people to potential health
hazards? - - ...x
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of..a.n aesthetically offensive site open to
public view? - _ ...x
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities? - _ ...x
Page 5 of 7
, '.' -'" --.-. """ - .. '.."'--,.".
. . .
~ Maybe t!Q
20. C91tural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of
or the destruction of a prehistoric or histori
c archaeological site? - _ ...x
b, Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure, or object? - _ ...x
c. Does the proposal have the potential to
cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values? - _ ...x
d~ Will the proposal restrict existing religious or
sacred uses within the potential impact area? - _ ...x
21, Mandatory Findings of Significance,
.
a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
. substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife to
drop below self sustaining levels, threatened
to eHminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a
rare or endangered plant or anim~1 or ,~
. eHminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory? - _ ...x
b. Does the project have the potential to
aèhieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmen!at goals? (A short-
term impact on the environment is one which
occurs ina relatively brief. definitive period
of time while long-term impacts will endure
well into the future.) - .- ..x
c. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may impact on two
or more separate resources where the impact
on each resource is' relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of those impacts
on the environment is significant.) - _ ...x
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse. effects
on human beings, either directly or
indir ctl ? :.x
e y. - -
Page 6 of 7
, ,., ,- .,', , '", '"" "", ~', ,...-.., '...'.";'"',.,:"'"".,,q,,,:,.' "," ,'.'.,." , ""~":'«""",4.~."':'~;;";,...",:~..,
- ,
, . .
m. Dis~ion of Environmental Evaluation
(Narrative description of environmental impacts,)
,.
See Attached
.
IV, Determination ,
(To be completed by the Lead Agency.)
~ On the basis öf this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COUlD NOT have a significant effect on œJ
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although' the proposed project could have a significant effect on D
the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the
project, A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WilL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the D
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMP Acr REPORT is required. .
4- ~- 4/1 ~,~d.?,-
Date Signature
For: ~ 'f £~
(Note: This is only a suggested form. Public agencies are free to devise their own format
for initial studies.)
.
.
Page 7 of 7
-~_..
. . .
.
DISCUSS.ON
L Earth
The project will grade and remove existing surficial soils in depths from 2-18 inches,
The preliminary geotechnical study, which comprises part of the hydrology study in,
Attachment B, states that the soil to be displaced is suitable to be used as compacted
fill after any deleterious material is removed, All lots will conform to the existing
~pography. Thus, the project will not substantially change the existing topography,
No significant impacts to or from site geòlogy and topography would occur.
,
2. Äk
The destruction of the existing structures and subdivision. grading of the lot would
cause dust emissions, as would project construction. During demolition and grading
standard dust control measures will be imp~emented; and no significant impacts are
expected, Other emissions would occur ~ an indirect result of project-related traffic,
These emissions would be insignificant of themselves, yet could contribute to regional
air quality concerns.
3. Water
The grading and eventual construction on the site will create impervious surfaces.
Although this will affect on-site absorption, the project proposes new curbs, gutters,
and drainage systems which will convey runoff to existing drainage systems which
have adequate capacity to handle the increased runoff. ,No significant impacts to
ground or surface water would occur,
4. Plant Life
Approximately 90 percent of the project site is covered with greenhouses. Scrub
vegetation exists around the perimeter of the project site, the majority of which is
located along the west side. AIi scrub vegetation will be removed prior to
construction and landscaping will be put in which has been approved by the City per
the submitted landscape plan, The current on-site agricultural use involves the
growing of cut Bowers for commercial sale. This type of crop is not unique to the site
(cut Bowers are grown throughout San Diego County) and the loss of approximately
7.0 acres of this type of agriculture is not considered a significant impact; however,
it is an incremental contribution to the regional loss of agricultural resources,
, -
: 2-
~ .. .. M~....,
. .
s. Animal Life
,
Due to the current agricultural uses no anima) resources occur on the project site;
however, normal domesticated type pets will most likely be introduced by residents
of the project. No significant impacts are expected as the surrounding area is largely
urban,
'- ~
The grading, construction, and future development of fifteen residences would not
create significant noise impacts, Grading and construction activities, however, could
create short-term noise levels greater than that allowed by the aty's Noise Element
of the General Plan. The short-term nature of these. activities results in these impacts
being considered below a level of significance, though they could be substantial.
Grading and construction activities should be limited to standard hours for these
types of activities, usually between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p,m., Monday through Friday,
7. Lipt and Glare
The development. of 15 single-family homes would create a new source of light and
glare, but this would be considered ~inimal and not significant.
8. Land Use
The project' would be a substantial change from the current agricultural type uses.
, The new use is acceptable and consistent, however, with the City's current zoning (R-
3) and General Plan Land Use Designation (Residential 201-3,0). The project
proposes an average of appro~tely 2.5 dwelling units per acre, which is within the
allowable land use designations for this area.
,. N &to raJaeso,u'c~
The project would result in an increase in the use of natural resources, specifically
fossil fuels, timber and water; however,. the increase would be negligible by itself, The
project would represent an incremental contribution to a significant regional demand
on these resources. The City could require that conservation techniques be
implemented in the future development of residences.
- 3 -
- . Q ..... -,-_. . ,.. . .,~, """ .. .. '. '...., .,. ..
. . .
"
10. Risk or Upset
The project does not involve the 'use of any hazardous materials. Additionally, the
.soil sampling study (Attachment C) found that pesticide cont9-mination of the soil
from the earlier greenhouse operation was lower than levels that would require some
remedial action.
lL Po.]Julation
The project, because the current on-site use is agriculture related, will increase the
population for the area. This gr9Wth is, however, anticipated by .the City (as
indicated by the residential desigriation of thè site), and will not came any significant
impacts.
u. Housine
Same as above.
13. J'ransportation/ CircubiWm
~ A traffic study was prepared by JHK Associates (May 1989) for the Ocean View
Estates development, which proposes 21 single family detached residential units.
This project is a part of that project, or 15 out of the 21 units. The conclusion of the
report (page 14) stated that:
The 21 single family detached housing units that comprise Ocean View
Estates will generate a maximum of 320 weekday trips, 2S a.m. peak
ho~ trips and 35 p.m. peak hour trips. The effect of these trips' on the
surrounding street network will be very minimS\1. We believe that no
traffic mitigation will be. necessary because of the added traffic !tom
Ocean View Estates. The recommendation to replace the "SLOW"
sign at the intersection of Sunset Drive and Ocean View Avemie with
a yield or stop sign is unrelated to the development
- Thus, the proposed project, which would generate fewer average daily trips, also
would have only a minimal effect on surrounding streets,. and no significant impacts
would occur.
- 4-
'" "!'."
. .
.
14. Public Services
The future development of 15 single-family residences would place an incremental
demand on Cty services and utilities; however, this demand is anticipated as this site
is planned for this type of develop~ent, and thus, is not considered significant.
15. Jn~raY
See Number 9.
1'- . Utilities
See Number 14,
17. Hllman H~Jlth
The project does not propose any activity or use that is considered hazardous to
human health. Also, see Number 10,
18. Aesthetics
Very few homes east of the proposed project site (a 'limited number of two-story
houses located in the adjacent area) currently have unobstructed views to the ocean,
No single-family homes, because of the existing greenhouses, have views to the ocean.
The removal of the greenhouses may provide additional view corridors because of
spacing between homes and corridors along access streets, Als,o at issue, however,
is the perceived rural/agricultural nature of the area due. to the greenhouses and
agricultural uses currently on site, The removal of these uses may represent a loss
. . of the rural/agricultural feeling for the area residents who prefer these types of uses
. ,
to that of residential development. The site is currently designated for residential
use, however, and as such the project would be a consistent and acceptable use,
Therefore, the project will not result in significant aesthetic impacts.
1'. Recreation
No recreational uses currently exist on the project site, and therefore no recreational
opportuI1;ities will be eliminated, Also, the future development of 15 single-family
homes will not place a substantial demand on recreational facilities in the area, and
thus the project will not have significant impacts on recreational opportunities,
- 5-
~.,-,..
. . .
.
10. Cultural Resources
. The site is currently developed with conunercial greenhouses, and is shown on the
City's Cultural Resource Sensitivity Map (City of Encinitas General Plan) as being
in a "Low Sensitivity" area. As such, no. evidence of cultural resources are present
on the site and no significant impacts are expected.
1L . .
Based on the review of issues discussed above, the project would not significantly
impact environmental resources or humans, would not achieve short-term goals to
the disadvantage of long-term goals, and creates only 'minor cumulative impacts to
air quality, natural resources, and agriculture.
,
- 6-
~
. ~tice of Determlna8t1 .
... Appendix H
To: - OffICe of Planning and Research From: (Public Agency) ¿'rrr .ð.P E Ä/t! /A~ /771-S
1400 T cnth S tteet. Room 121 ~ 7 li"AJt! (If) r/J1$ AvD.
Saaamerno. CA 95814 (NMlr8Ø).
. FV~/IJI ~ t! A~¥
$- County Clerk '
County of L~.;v 'Pte<k> e
2 2() tV. ffPd~ llty .,
SA'A./ 11So. tl1 '12/ð/.
f
Subj«:t:
FIling of'NotJee of Determination In compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
g'f-J<1'¡f}1 mil : 8"/-lq7PR
Project TItle . , "
J/: C!-¡O'f l tJLl3 - I~ . C!VI'ZRIA5U ((;,/f') 9o/~-~
swe Clearinghouse Number Lead Agency Ar=k CodclI' elephonelExœnsion
(If IIIbmilled 10 Cle8rin¡h0us8) Coruact Person
~" ¿;~~ ¡/¡eW ßvÇ. E~ C?dop T:T' t9P- SA,f/ p,.~
Project location (include county) /
Project Description: /S'-L&17"" .svß&¥I//s/~ &Jp 6.ti? ~12£ ~t:!.t:L AA/Z> l/ES/~M
REV/6Z</ F<:Þ/Z /.s-.~~ ~S/~-~,r1I¿')-' {)¿vE'~~
This is tô advise that the ~r:: é?r ~,:v/7":J1IIr has approved the above described project on
. cI Alcacy 0 Responsible Alcncy
~A~ ~ ~9/ and has made the following delenninalions regarding the above described project:
(Dale;
1. The project (Owill [ijwill not] have a signific:lIU effect on the environment.
1. :J An Environmental Impact Repon was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
. ~ A Negative Decla.r3tion was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigation measw-es rë!Qwere uwere not] made a condiúon of the approval of the project.
4, A suu,cment of Overriding Considerations [Jwas Sðwas not] adopted for this project.
S. Fmdings (Qwere D?Jwcæ not] made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
This is 10 certify that the final EIR with commentS and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at:
e ,.. ~ 01"'" IF .:u <' h( / / 771 r Æ ;CJ. A/ tlIlU t!,. ~'j Ç'2 7 ~A!!/O/~.s &ø. ~/Vt!/L//'1Ifs
~ . )
~~ ~ 6'j.c¡¡ ~/~ .:¡:t~
Sig1U%lUl"t (public Agency) Date . Tii/e
Dale received for filing at OPR:
Revised October /989
-...-,..-.-
...
. ..
,þ CAL8RNIA DEPAR~ OF FISH. GAME
CER 11FI CA TE OF FEE EXEMPT! 0 N
De Minimis Impact Finding
project ~itle/Location (Baae aDd A4dress of project) t ' Located. in City of
þcinita.. COunty of San Diego.at 380 Ocean View Ave.
Case H 89-196TK/EIA, 89-197DR (App~icant ISCO Developers)
project Description: Proposed lS lo~ subdivision of a 6.9 acre parcel presently
containing greenhouses (to be demolished) and design review
for lS detached single-family residences.
-
riDding. of Zx-ptioD
No impact.s have been identified which will adversely affect:
(A) Riparian land, rivers, streams, watercourses, and wetlands under state and
federal jurisdiction¡
(B) Native and non-native plant life and the Boil required to sustain habitat
for fish and wildlife¡
(C) Rare and unique plant life and ecological communities dependent on plant
life¡ ~nd
(D) Listed threatened and endangered plant and animals and the habitat in
which they are believed to reside.
(E) All species or plant or animals as listed as protected or identified for
special management in the Fish and Game Code, the Public Resource. Code,
~he Water code orrequlations adopted ther.under.
(F) All mar ine and terrestrial species suDject to the jurisdiction of the
Departmen~ of Fish and Game and the ecological communities in which they
reside.
.(G) All air and water resources the degradation of which will individually or
cumulatively result in'a loss of biological diversity among the plants ,and
animals residing in that air and water.
,
Pl..se see ~eaative Declaration/ErR initial stuåy for more information,
Certification:
I hereby certify that the lead agency has made the above findings of fact
and that based upon ,the initial study and hearing record the project will not
individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as
d_fined in Section 711,2 of the Fish and Game code.
~ a.- .~
for Patrick S. Murphy
Title: community Development Director
Lead Agency: City of Encinitas
Da~e: ¿'/3/91
I
CR/O3/PF2-319 w~5.1 (5/1/91-1)
. . . .
.
RESOLUTION NO. PC91-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAKHING COHKISSION
APPROVING A
TUTATIVE HAP AND DBSIGN REVIEW PBRHIT
I'OR A1f 15 LOT SuBDIVISION 01' A 6. 9 ACRE PARCEL
AND DESI:G1I RBVZBW J'OR 15 SI:NGLE I'AXILY BOKES
J'OR THE PROPBRTY LOCATED WEST 01' OCEAN VI:EW
BETWEBN tnfION ST. AND SUBSBT DR.
(CASE NUHBBRB 88-196TH/BIA AND 89-197DR) .
WHEREAS, a request for consideration of a Tentative Map and
Design Review Permit was filed by ISCO Development Inc. to allow
subdivision of an existing 6.9 acre parcel into 15 lots and
construction of 15 single family homes thereon in the R3 zone per
Title 24 and Chapter 23.08 of the City of Encinitas Municipal Code,
for the property located at 380 Ocean View, west of Ocean View
between Union and Sunset, legally described as:
A portion of Lots 4 and 5 of Block "W" of $easide Gardens Annex,
in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the
Map thereof No. 1801, filed in the ,Office of the County Recorder
on August 6, 1924; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the application on
April 26 and December 13, 1990 by the Old Encinitas CAB, at which
time the Board vote~ to recommend Planning Commission approval of
the application; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Encinitas Planning
Commission on May 16, 1991;
WHEREAS, the Community Advisory Board and Planning Commission
considered:
1. The staff reports dated April 17 and December 7, 1990,
and April 29, 1991 with attachments;
2. The applications, tentative map and project Plans
submitted by applicant dated received by the City March
October 5, 1990;
3. Oral evidence submitted at the hearing;
4. Written evidence 'submitted at the hearing; and
5., The revised Draft Negative Declaration with associated
studies performed by Diana Richardson/Keller
Environmental Associat.es dated April 3, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings
pursuant to Title 24 and Chapter 23.08 of the Encinitas Municipal
Code:
TC/89196TM.RES (4-29-91)
. . .
(SEE ATTACHMENT .. A")
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
the City of Encinitas that applications 89-196TM/EIA and 89-197DR
are hereby approved subject to the following conditions:
(SEE ATTACHMENT .. B")
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City
of Encinitas that:
This project will not have a significant effect on the environment
and a negative declaration is hereby certified; pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
,
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1991, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES: . Commissioners Dean, Rotsh~ck, Bagg, Dean, Stumpf
NAYS: None .
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
, Lester H. Bagg, Chairman
of the Encinitas Planning
Commission
ATTEST:
,
Patrick S. Murphy
Secretary
TCj89196TM.RES (4-29-91)
'_..~, .
' .
RESOLUTION NO. PC 91-17
ATTA,CJDŒN'1' "A"
FINDINGS FOR SUBDIVISION (TITLE 24)
FDmINGS FOR DBSIGN REVIEW (CHAPTBR 23.08)
Findings ror a Tentative Hap:
a. That the propos-ed map is consistent with applicable
general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451
of the Subdivision Map Act.
Evidence: There is no applicable specific plan. The 2.5
dwelling unit per acre density of the proposed subdivision is
within the density range of the R3 zone, and meets the mid-
range density of that zone such that the findings to exceed
mid-range density need not be made as contained in Sect. .
30.16.010 (B.). Subject to the attached conditions, the map
will be in full compliance with the City's Subdivision
Ordinance and State Map Act.
b. That the design or imp~ovement of the proposed
subdivision is consistent with applicable general and
specific plans.
.
Evidence: Detached single family type homes are expressly
allowed for in the Residential 2 - 3 du/ac land use category
in the Encini tas General Plan. There is no applicable specific
plan.
c. That the site is physically suitable for the type of
de:velopment.
Evidence: Most of the subject property ts nearly level and,
based upon the preliminary soils report submitted with the
application and compliance with the recommendations contained
therein, is suitable physically for the detached single-family
type of development proposed.,' .
d. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed
density of development.
Evidence: Project design demonstrates that the proposed
density of development (2.5 du/ac) can easily be facilitated
on site while conforming with or exceeding all City
development regulations.
e. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed
improvements' are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially or avoidably injure
' fish or wildlife or their habitat.
. . .
Evidence: The Initial Environmental Assessment prepared in
conjunction with Keller Environmental Associates found that
there will be no potentially significant adverse impacts
created by the project which will require mitigation.
Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been certified in
conjunction with the approval of the project.
f. That the design of the subdivision or the type of
improvements is not likely to cause serious public health
problems.
Evidence: The applicant has obtained letters of sewer and
water availability and all public utilities and services are
in place to serve the proj ect. The applicant will acquire
necessary easements and construct necessary improvements to
conduct drainage to the nearest approved public drainage
facilities as a condition of this approval.
g. That. the design of. the subdivision or the type of .
improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired
by the public at large, for access through or use of,
property within the proposed subdivision.
Evidence: No public/other easements traversing the site are
shown on the Tentative Map with which the subdivision or the
proposed development conflicts. No prescrip~ive or other
easements. are in evidence.
h. That the Final or Parcel Map is in substantial compliance"
with the previously approved Tentative Map.
Evidence: Not applicable for consideration of the Tentative
Map.
i. That the City Council and the authorized agency have not
acted in accordance with Section 66747.5 of the act
relating to land projects.
Evidence:, The City Council has not acted to revert the subject
property to acreage.
j. That in accordance with Sections 66473 and 66472.5 of the
Act, the Map does not comply with the conditions or
requirements imposed by this Title and Act.
Evidence: The subdivision meets all Map Act standards in
effect at the time the application was deemed to be complete.
k. That the resulting parcels are too small to sustain
agricultu~al use in accordance with Section 66747.4 of the
Act.
, . .
.
Evidence: Not applicable because the subject site is less than
10 acres in area.
1. That the proposed subdivision is entirely within the
corporate boundaries of the city.
Evidence: The subject property is entirely within City.
boundaries.
m. That the property is served by an on-site sewage disposal
system and the health Department has certified that the system
is satisfactory to support the proposed subdivision.
Evidence: A small portion ,of the subject property is presently
outside the boundaries of the Encinitas Sanitation District.
The applicànt has begun proceedings to annex to that district
through the Local Agency Formation Committee (LAFCO). Those
proceedings will be required to be completed and the
annexation complete before any Final Map will be allowed to
record. Thus, the subject property will be served by off-site
sewer facilities in place and availab¡e to the property. .
Findings for design Review:
A~ The project design is consistent with the General Plan,
any Specific Plan, or the provisions of this Code.
Evidence to consider: Subj ect to the City's conditions of
approval, the project will conform with all development
regulations contained in the Municipal Code.. The proj ect is
consistent with the residential zone regulations of Sect.
30.16.010 and, more specifically, the regulations for the
single-family residential zones of Sect. 30.16.010 (C), which
states "New residential development 'shall be designed based
on the concept of small, distinctive neighborhood areas
(generally less that 20 dwelling units per neighborhood area:
...)". There is no applicable specific plan. The subject
.property does not lie within any of the special purpose
overlay zones contained in the General Plan. Staff and the
Commission.have identified no goals or policies of the General
Plan with 'which this proposal wou¡d be inconsistent.
B. The project design is substantially consistent with the
City's Design Review Guidelines.
Evidence to consider: What fòllows is a brief discussion of
the project as it relates to the City's Design Review
Guidelines, broken down by Section:
a. . Site Design -
1.1 - The applicant has taken advantage of the relatively
large lot sizes in the R3 zone :to provide varying
building orientations and setbacks. The street
"
. . .
,
arrangement and larger rear yard setbacks will create
significant open corridors through the property.
1.2, 1.3 ,- No significant mature trees or other
landscaping or significant assets of the site hove been
noted for, preservation. Changes to present land forms
will be minimal.
1.4 - Based upon site visits and photographic evidence
submitted by the applicant, it do,es not appear that there
are significant westward views presently enjoyed by the
homes across Ocean View which would be impaired by this
development. Some' view opportunities may be present
,across the street from some portions of the site at the
second story level, however, mature landscaping appears
to be preventing any such views presently. As was noted
earlier, rear yard setbacks larger than those required
will result in substantial open corridors through the
property, although it is not clear that this will create
or preserve any view opportunities.
.
1.5, 1.7, 1.8 - The side-entry garages will effectively
help in screening parking areas and parked cars from
view. Pedestrian entry ways to the homes are separated
from vehicular access areas and main entrances to the
homes will be vÜfÏble from the street. Meandering
walkways are proposed adjacent to all street frontages.
Different texture treatments of the driveways and ground
cover islands withj.n them have also been utilized to
soften the appearance of the paved areas.
b. Building Design
2.1, 2.3 - The homes are of 5 different models with 2
different exterior design treatments for each. No model
and/or design treatment occurs more than twice within the
project, such that the project should achieve a "custom
home" appearance designed to fit the site and individual
lots. The architectural treatment of the homes is
consistent, among all elevations as well as among the
different ho~es.
2 . 4 - Variation in exterior materials and colors has been
used with. constraint. All homes feature exteriors
utilizing primarily stucco with some wood siding . A
color palette consisting of softer pastel colors for
building exteriors with complimentary colors for building
trim has been submitted by the applicant and was
considered at the hearing.
2.6, 2.7, 2.11 - Each home features several pitched or
hipped roof elements which help create visual interest
and reduce building mass. Variation in horizontal and
vertical lines is substantial. Roofs will be of concrete
, . .
roof tile and will be compatible in design with the
buildings.
c. Landscape Design
3.1, 3.2 - Landscape materials selected are repeated
throughout and .should promote a sense of continuity and
cohesiveness. Apart from perimeter plantings, rear yard
landscapi,ng is proposed to be left to the individual
property owners.
3.3, 3.9 - All landscape materials are drought tolerant
species and are contained in the City I s "Master Plant
Materials List".
3.4 - The size of landscaping selected should result in
a mature appearance within 3 years. All trees apart from
the fast-growing Eucalyptus are of a minimum 15 gallon
size, with the "New Zealand christmas Tree"street trees
of a 24 inch box size. All shrubs except for the Cistus .
Salvifolus and Agapanthus Africanus are proposed to be
of a 5 gallon size.
3.7 - The applicants have selected a còmmon street tree
(New Zealand Christmas tree - 24 inch box size) which
will help to ~nify the streetscape and provide a common
theme.
3.10, 3.11 - The applicant is proposing to utilize 4
different fence types within the project. Generally
speaking, 6 ft. high wood fencing with vertical panels
is proposed along the frontage with Ocean View while 6
ft. wood fencing with horizontal panels is proposed to
separate the side property boundaries of the individual
lots and along the rear lot lin.s. It should be noted
that the former fence type along the street features a
small cap on the posts which exceeds 6 ft. in height and
cannot be allowed without a variance. The fencing in the
front yard areas and running laterally between the homes
is of an open, rail construction and is to be paintèd
white.
Summary: The Commission finds that the proj ect is in
substantial conformance with the City I S Design Review
Guidelines.
C. The project would not adversely effect the health, safety,
or general welfare of the community..
Evidence: Subject. to the conditions of approval which have
been attached with approval, this project will result in no
significant adverse impacts to the environment or the
community. Finding that the project will not likely result in
any significánt adverse impacts, the Commission certifies the
. .
.
associated neqative declaration prepared by Diana Richardson/
Keller Environmental Associates dated April 3, 1991.
D. The project would not cause the surroundinq neiqhborhood
to depreèiate materially in appearance or value.
Evidence: The project represents an upqrade to the site and
no evidence has been presented to suqqest that any material'
depreciation would result to the appearance or values in the
neiqhborhood. , .
.
.
- ...'
. . .
.
RBSOLUTION NO. PC91-17
CONDITIONS OF APPRO~
ATTACBKBN"r "B"
. Applicant: ISCO Development
Ca.. NO: . 89-196TM/EIA, 89-197DR
Su]:)j8ct: Conditions of ~pproval
Location: West of Ocean View between Union and Sunset
I. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS .
A. Prior to recordation of the Final. Map, the
. applicant shall make arranqements satisfactory to
the Community Development Department to reserve a .
unit to be ren~ed at or below "Fair Market Rent"
established by HUD to tenants qualified for section
8 Rent Subsidies by the County Housinq Authority,
or pay an In-lieu Fee to provide the subdivider's
fair share contribution toward meetinq the City's
affordable housinq obj ecti ve in accordance with
Chapter 24.21 of the Encinitas Municipal Code.
B. Prior to Final Map recordation, all annexation
proceedinqs shall be completed and all' of the
subject property shall be annexed to the Encinitas
Sanitary District.
C. Prior to Final Map recordation, the applicant shall
submit and obtain Community Advisory Board Approval
of a revised landscape plan, to indicate (1) use of
an alternate low, spreadinq street tree for the
streetscape within the project as well as Ocean
View, (2) an upqrade to the size of landscapinq
proposed, with specific sizes called out for
specific plant materials, and (3) deletion of the
~orry pine near the northeast corner of the site.
D. Prior to Final Map recordation, in conjunction with
the landscape plan described in Condition IC above, .
the applicant shall explore and report back to the
Community Advisory Board on alternative, less
formal curb treatments than standard G-2 curb to
the satisfaction of the community Advisory Board.
.
TC/O2/CR08-516wp51(6/3/91-8) CASE NO.: 89-196TM/EIA; 89~197DR
paqe 1 of 9
.~~,
, .' .
.
II. STANDARD CONDITIONS
1. QlDIBRAL CONDITIONS
A. This approval will expire in two years, on May 16,
1993, at 5:00 p.m. unless the conditions have been
met or an extens ion has been approved by the
Authorized Agency.
B. This approval may be appealed to the authorized
agency within 15 calendar days from the date of
this approval.
C. In the event that any of the conditions of. this
permit. are not satisfied, the Planning and
Community Development Department shall cause a
noticed hearing to be set before the authorized
agency to determine wny the City of Encinitas
should nøt revoke this permit.
D. Approval of this request shall not waive complianc.
with any sections of the Zoning Development Code .
and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect
at the time of Building Permit issuance unless
specifically waived herein.
E. The applicant shall comply with. the latest adopted
Uniform Building .Code, Uniform Mec:;hanical Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code,
Uniform Fire Code, and all other applicable codes
. and ordinances in effect at the time of building
permit issuance unless specifically waived herein.
F. This approval shall become null and void if
building permits are not issued for this project
within two years from the date of project approval.
If the applicant is not able to obtain building
permits due to a growth management program within
the two year period, this approval may be extended
by the Director of Planning and Communi ty
Development tq allow for the issuance of building
,.. - . permits.
G. Permits from other agencies will be required as
follows:
Coastal Commission
H. Pr'ior to issuing a final inspection on framing, the
applicant shall provide a survey from a licenseq
surveyor or a registered civil engineer verifying
the building heights are in compliance with the
. design review permit.
TC/02/CR08-516wp5 2(6/3/91-8) CASE NO.: 89-196TM/EIA¡ 89-197DR
Page 2 of 9
......'
" '. .
.
I. Project is approved as submitted/modified as
,- evidenced by the project site plan, floor plans,
and elevations consisting of 25 sheets, landscape
plan consisting of 2 sheets, and Tentative Map
consisting of 1 sheet, all dated received by the
City of Encinitas on October 5,1990 and signed by
a, City Official as approved by the Planning'
commission on May 16,1991 and shall not be altered
without Planning, 'and Community Development
Department reyiew and approval.
J. Should this project be identified as having a
, potential impact on fish and/or wildlife, pursuànt
to section 711.4 ,of the State Fish and Game ~ode,
the applicant must submit to the city of Encinitas
a negotiable check in the amount of '$1,275.00 if
this project includes a negative declaration or, a
check in the amount of $875.00 if this project
. includes an Environmental Impact Report. The
purpose of the above State established fee is to .
defray the cost of managing ànd protecting fish and
wildlife resources which may be impacted by
development. The check made payable to the County
Clerk of San Diego County must be submitted prior
to the end of the 4th day after the end, of the 15
day appeal period if not appealed or, if the City
Council approved the project, at the end of the 4th
day following the City Council action. Failure to
submit a negotiable check will cause the project
approval to become null and void since the,
environmental notice of determination can not ,be
filed without payment of the above fee or
authorized notice of exemption as provided in
section 711.4. NO BUILDING PERMITS OR OTHER
ENTITLEMENTS WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THIS CONDITION
IS SATISFIED.
DPLICUT SHALL COIITAC'l'DB DBPAR'l'JŒN'l'. 01' PLUmING UJ) COJOmNI'l'Y
DBVBLOP1IB1fT ltBGARDING COXPLI.ù1CB WITH THB POLLOWING CONDITIONS:
2. SIT. DBVBLOP!QDI'l' .
A. Site shall be developed in accordance with the
approved site plans which are dated and signed as
approved on May 16, '1991 by the Planning commission
and which are on file in the Planning and Community
Development Department and the conditions contained
herein.
B. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners,
shall be architecturally inteqrated, shielded from
view and sound buffered from adjacen1; properties
,
TC/02/CR08-516wp5 3(6/3/91-8) CASE NO.: 89-196TM/EIA¡ 89-197DR
Page 3 of 9
. .
.
and streets as required and approved by the
Department of Planning' and Community Development.
c. For new residential dwelling unites), the applicant
shall pay development fees at the established rate.
Such fees may include, but not be limited to:
Permit and Plan Checking Fees, School Fees, Water
and Sewer Service Fees, Traffic Fees, Drainage'
Fees, and Park Fees. Arrangements' to pay these
fees shall be made prior to:
Final map approval.
D. A plan shall be submitted for approval by the
Director of Planning and community Development and
the Encinitas Fire Department regarding the
security treatment of the site during the
construction phase, the on- and off-site
circulation and parking of construction workers'
vehicles and any heaVy equipment needed for the
construction of the project. .
3. PAlUt:tHG ANDVEHICtJLAR ACCESS
Driveways shall meet the standards of the Zoning
Ordinance, Public Works Standards, and the
Offstreet Parking Design Manual.
4. LAlmSCAPING
A. All required plantings and irrigation systems shall
be in place prior to use or occupancy of new
buildings or structures. All required plantings
and irrigation systems shall be maintained in good
condition, and whenever necessary, shall be
replaced with new materials to ensure continued
compliance with applicable landscaping, buffering,
screening and irrigation requirements. All
landscaping and irrigation systems shall be
maintained in a manner that will not depreciate
adjacent property values and otherwise adversely
affect adjacent properties.
B. Landscaping shall be maintained in such a way so
view corridors are not blocked. A standard
covenant specifying this condition shall be
recorded with the County Recorder to give
constructive notice to future purchasers of the
site.
TC/O2/CR08-516wp5 4(6/3/91-8) CASE NO.: 89-196TM/EIA¡ 89-197DR
Page 4 of 9
" . .
.
APPL:ICUT SHALL COIITACT 'l'KB DTC:IN:ITAS J':IRB PROTBCT:IOB D:ISTR:ICT
RBGARDXBØ COKPL:tAHCB W:t'l'K '1'KB J'OLLOW:ING COND:IT:IONS:
5. no
A. The unobstructed paved width of a fire access
roadway shall be not less than 24 feet. EXCEPTION:
A fire access roadway providing access to only one '
single family dwelling shall be not less than 16
feet in paved width.
B. Turnarounds: . All dead-end fire access roads in
excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with
a cul-de-sac or equivalent turning area
satisfactory to the Fire Chief. The minimum radius
of a cul-de-sac shall not be less than 40 feet.
c. Gates: All automatic gates across fire access
roadways shall be equipped with approved emergency
key operated switches overriding all command
functions and opening the gate. Gates accessing .
more than three residences' or residential lots
shall also be equipped with approved emergency
traffic control activating strobe sensor(s), which
will activate the gate on the approach of emergency
apparatus. All automatic gates must meet Fire
Department policies deemed necessary by the Chief
for rapid reliable access.
D. Response Maps: Any development which necessitates,
by virtue of new structures, fire hydrants,
roadways or similar features, shall be required to
provide map updates in a format compatible with
current department mapping services, and shall be
charged a reasonable fee for updating all response
maps..
E. Prior to delivery of combustible building materials
on site, water and sewer systems shall
satisfactorily pass all required tests and be
connected to the public water and sewer systems.
In addition, the first lift of asphalt paving shall
be in place to provide adequate, permanent access
for eaergency vehicles. Said access shall be
maintained to the satisfaction of the Fire
Department.
F. All two-way traffic aisles sha1l be a minimum of 24
feet wide andemerqency access shall be provided,
, maintained free and clear a minimum of 24 feet wide
at all times during construction in accordance with
Fire District requirements.
TC/02/CR08-516wp5 5(6/3/91-8) CASE NO.: 89-196TM/EIA¡ 89-197DR
Page 5 of 9
'. .. .
'
.
G. Submit.a letter from the Fire Districtstatinq
satisfaction with the type and location of fire
hydrants and the minimum water flow in qallons per
minute toqether with a letter to the appropriate
aqency certifyinq that the fire' department's
minimum required water flow is available to serve
the project. Provisions shall be made to ensure a ,
maximum water pressure at the hydrant of 250 psi.
The installation of a pressure reducinq station may
be required. Fire hydrants shall be of a bronze
type and shall be identified by installinq a "blue"
reflectinq dot on the street surface pursuant to
Fire District Standards.
F .H. #1. N/S Linda Dei Sur Lot #B
F.H. #2. N/W Corner of Ocean View and Calle Del
Adele
H. Address numbers shall be clearly visible from the
street frontinq the structure. Where structures
are located off a roadway on lonq driveways, a .
monument shall, be placed at the entrance where the
driveway intersects the main roadway. Permanent
address numbers shall be dispiayed on this
monWllent.
I. Structures shall be protected by automatic fire
sprinkler systems. Sprinkler system. shall be
installed to the satisfaction of the Encinitas Fire
Protection District.
J. Prior to final map recordation, the applicant shall
submit a letter from the Fire District statinq that
all development impact, plan check and/or .cost
recovery fees have been paid or secured to the
satisfaction of the District.
6. , BU:ILDDlG
A. Provide 'compliance with the Uniform Buildinq code
for property line clearances considerinq use, area
and fire resistance of existinq buildinqs.
B. Prior to the buildinq department approvinq the
connection to the buildinqs to the private sewer or
water systems located in the private riqht of way,
the civil enqineer responsible for the design and
the inspector responsible for the systèm inspection
must certify in writinq to the Director of Public
Works that the sewer and/or water systems were
designed and constructèd in accordance with the
utility district or aqency standards for public
systems.
.
TC/02/CR08-516wp56(6/3/91-8) CASE NO.: 89-196TM/EIA¡ 89-197DR
paqe 6 of 9
~ ..~' ~
'. . .
'
.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THB PUBLIC WOlUtS D BPARTXBN'l' RBGARDING
COMPLIANCB WITH THB FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
7. Gradina çonditions
A. Noqrading permits shall be issued for this subdivision
prior to recordation of the final' map.
B. The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the
c01D1l1encement of any clearinq or grading of the site.
C. "The grading for this project is defined in Chapter 23.24
of the Encini tas Municipal' Code. Grading shall be
performed under the observation of a civil engineer whose
responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection
and testing to ensure compliance of the work with the'
approved grading plan, submit required reports to the
City Enqineer and verify compliance with Chapter 23.24 of
the Encinitas Municipal Code.
D. No grading shall occur outside the l1mi ts of the .
SUBDIVISION unless a letter of permission is obtained
from ~e owners of the affected properties.
E." All newly created slopes within this project shall be no
steeper than 2:1.
F. A soils/geological/hydraulic report (as applicable) shall
be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State
.of California to perform such work prior to final map
approval or at first submittal of a grading plan.
8. Drainaae Conditions:
:
A. The developer shall exercise special care during the
construc,tion phase of this proj ect to prevent any offsi te
siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control
measures and shall construct temporary
desiltation/detention basins of type, size and location
as approved by the City Engineer. The basins and erosion
control measures shall be shown and specif ied on the
grading plan" and shall be constructed to the satisfaction
of the city Engineer prior to the start of any other
grading operations. Prior to the removal of any basins
or facilities so constructed the area served shall be
protected by additional drainage facilities, slope
erosion control measures and other methods required or
approved by the City Enqineer. The developer Ithall
maintain the temporary basins and erosion control
measures for a period of time satisfactory to the City
engineer and shall guarantee their maintenance and
satisfactory perfonnance through case deposit and bonding
in amounts and types suitable to the City Engineer.
TC/O2ICR08-516wp5 7(6/3/91-8) CASE NO.: 89-196TM/EIA¡ 89-197DR
Page 7 of 9
.
. . .
,
B. A drainage system capable of handling and disposing of
all surface water originating within the subdivision, and
.all surface waters that may flow onto the subdivision
from adjacent lands, shall be required. said drainage
system shall include any easements and structures as
required by the city Engineer to properly handle the
drainage to via Julita as shown on the Tentative Map.
C. The developer shall pay the current local drainage area
fee prior to approval of the final map for this project
or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with
the Master Drainage Plan and city of Encinitas Standards
as required by the City Engineer.
I
D. Concentrated flows across driveways and/or sidewalks
shall not be permitted.
9. Street condition~
A. The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the
City for all public streets and easements required by
thesecondi tions ,or shown on the TENTATIVE MAP. The
offer shall be made BY A CERTIFICATE ON THE FINAL MAP for
~is project. All land so offered shall be granted to
the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and
without cost to the City. streets that are already
public .are not required to be rededicated.
B. 8 feet shall be dedicated by the developer along the
subdivision frontage based on a center line to .right-of-
way width of 30 feet and in conformance with the City of
Encinitas Standards.
C. Direct access rights for all lots abutting. Ocean View
Avenue shall be waived o~. the final map. .
D. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-
way, a right-of-way construction permit shall be obtained
from the Public Works office and appropriate fees paid,
in addition to any other permits required.
E. Plan specifications, and supporting documents for all
improvements shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map, the
Subdivider shall install, or agree to install and secure
with appropriate security as provided by law,
improvements toci ty Standards to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer:
Half street paving, curb and gutter for Ocean View
Avenue, 40 feet paving, curb and gutter for Via Linda Del
Sur, and Calle De Adele.
TC/02ICRO8-516wp5 8(6/3/91-8) CASE NO.: 89-196TM/EIA¡ 89-197DR
Page 8 of9
" . .
.
.
F. Developer shall execute and record a covenant with the
County Recorder agreeing not to oppose the formation of
an assessment district to fund the installation of right-
of-way improvements.
G. Developer shall execut~ and record a covenant with the
County Recorder agreeing not to oppose th~ formation of
an assessment district to' fund the installation of right- '
of -way improvements. .
Prior to close of escrow the developer ~~all
require that the prospective þroperty owners sign
and return the following statement to the City of
Encinitas Department of Planning and Community
Development:
"In purchasing the home on Lot , I am
aware of and understand that Iam agreeing not
to oppose the formation of an assessment
district to fund the installation of right-of-
way improvements." , ,
H. The design of all private streets and drainage systems
shall be approved by the City-Engineer prior to APPROVAL
OF THE FINAL MAP for this project. The standard
improvement plan check deposit is required.
10. uti~ities
A. The developers shall comply with all. the rules,
regulations and design requirements of the respective
utility agencies regarding service to the project.
B. The developer shall be responsible for coordination with
S.D.G.E., Pacific Telephone, and other applicable
authorities.
c. All proposed utilities within the project shall be
installed underground including existing utilities unless
exempt by the Municipal Code.
D. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation and
underqrounding of existing public utilities, as required.
11. IG
This project is approved specifically as 1 (single)
phase.
TC/02/CR08-516wpS 9 (6/3/91-8') CASE NO.: 89-196TM/EIA¡ 89-197DR
Page 9 of 9
"-"
. . "
.
~ .
I
.....
>
11:1
-
,.. ~ ~ ~ :- ~ -
EZ! I: ~II ! Iii (")
",
i I ~ ",
VI
~: '11¡i.li
,j ~ I~ Ii I !.í
!~ os: I: ;11
. 00 ~; . .~.~ ~h
..' 10' ~
.' . :
I 'IE .
I:i"~ h
f
i
V
c i f
~ _III
~ E!.~ I
en I!Ii " .,'
R. =' i:f
n
5' :8 ~ rer iZ .
:::' c:
= 1.[ w
l ='
3 '<;0
r¡-
~ õ'
~ - III
0
-.
..
,--" "',." .," '" ...-
-- ._.
. - ' -- .,
- . - .
~ - ...
.,... 1
Date: March '131, 1989
Name Tv¡:¡noS::1::¡:¡møgn::l
Address.. l'C:¡~[¡? 'HJ'noTrhnrnp Rl vn. Ste, 210
Lawndale, CA 90260
As the proponent(s) for this annexation of property identified
as 256:411'25. ~. _.~... to the Encinitas
Assessor's Parcel Number(s)
District, I understand and aqree that annexinq into the District does
not guarantee sewer service or commit sewer capacity to the su=ject
property beinq annexed. Also, the District by acceptinq the application
does not represent that it will provide any treatment plant expansions
or sewer line extension to provide capacity or service for the subject
area to be annexed. Acceptance of this application and final annexation
of the property only allows the property to be served at such time as
., the owner(s) of the annexed property pay all necessary costs for the
sewerage facilities which can transport, treat and dispose of the
. wastewater qenerated by the property. This may mean the proponent(s)
shall pay for a part or all of the required facilities to serve the
property.
,
¡
BO/O4/MS3-217wp5 (1-17-89-3)
,,- ,
. .
APPœÐIX D
l«Yl'IŒ OF DE'l'ERIIINATrŒ
'ro: x:. Office of Planning and Research PIO(: (Public Agency)
- 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 (' IT." Or Gb/1/"'//7AS
Sacramento, CA 95814 5'2..7 6vt'./Q/TAJ R~ vp.
EA/CIAI/7"~S / CA, '12 (/2'1
~ County Clerk
County of ,. ~ ~a-o "
" ~ / ~ ilIA/)/,
,~-w P:~~ M
,
SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or
21152 of the Public Resources Code.
\-
¡i~P¿~;~
S te Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Area êode/Number IExtension
(I f Sul:mi tted to Clearinghouse) /
~72 ~ 3:¿ - ~~ &"&/./}F_A/ V¿'/9) 9l¡'- S-CJ~S-
Pro ect Location
WBsr c!:),p ~þ I//GW AIÆ, ßÇ'¿7"~~~?CI Sv~er Þ.e. A.vÞ t&-//ðA/ ST:
Project Description
I4.vUE'>':"':¡77t?"v ¿J,c ~ AI-.p,.o;eoÅ", &,,2. ;'/-CRt: 'p?9£ð.€¿.. c::?F ~;'i/~ ?Æ6~S~/t/T¿'y
ð;7AJTA7,(//,v6- é~~~P~~ ?ð '7iH:Ç b.~âU/?;l;S S.4.v/r,lC},ey ZJ/.s-r-.
This is to advise that the ~ /rY ~ ¡t;;;v(!////72'1s
.. ( Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the above described project on ...tt" 3/, /~and has made the follow-
Date
ing determinations regarding the above described project:
1. The project ---will, ~will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
- pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
~ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to
the provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigation measures _were, ~ere not made a. condition of the ap-
proval of the project.
4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was, ~ not adopted for
this project. -
This is to certify that the final ErR with comments and responses and record of
project approval is available to the General Public at:
~~ t?/, ÇÆ/¿J/"'(//TI9~ éOMfltvP/TY :J/et/Æt.LJ>?P?éÆ17 LÆ=PT.
527 eve/ u ff~.5 .81-// tV I. éiA.O/A/ /T/9.s / C' A . ? ZO ¿ If
Date Received for Filing and Posting at OPR
-/~ ~~..?~ "4~/47iÇ" RA...v~
Signature (Public Agency) Title
Revised Uarch 1986
280
L.
~i{;-;' .. 8'
'," ,.,",'
"¡'¿,,; ¡,...
DlCIBITAS SUITUY DISTRICT
AGIDIIa RBPORT
...tinq Dat.: S.pt88ber 26,1'89
" TOtØ. Warren H. Shafer, District Manaqer
FROM: t!!TO1II Henie, Utilities Planner ~
va: ~ Morton F. Auqust. District Engineer 'VV\
Robert A. Warren, City Enqineer
DATE: September 19, 1989
SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution 89-12, Application for Annexation
to the Encinitas Sanitary District of 2.66 Acres Located
Approximately 1,000 Feet North of the Intersection of
Sunset and Oceanview Avenues - Ivano Stameqna
BACltGRpmm:
This is a request to annex 2.66 acres. Annexation is required to
provide sewer service to eiqhteen (18) future sinqle family
dwellinqs.
DISCUSSIOB:
Tentative Parcel Map 89-196 divides 6.96 acres (three parcels) into
eiqhteen .35 acre lots. 2.66 acres of this proposed development
are outside the District boundary and must be annexed as a
condition of final map approval (see attached plat map).
The proposed annexation is in conformance with the Encinitas
Board's policy on annexations for sinqle family dwellinqs on
leqally sized lots and conforms with current zoninq (R-3). The
parcel is within the District's sphere of influence and is located
approximately 1,000 feet north of the intersection of Sunset and
Oceanview Avenues.
RBCOIl1lBIIDATIOB:
It is recommended that the Board of Directors:
1. Find pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15074
(California Environmental Quality Control Act of 1970), that
this project would not have an effect on the environment
(Neqative Declaration Loq No. 89-145).
2. Adopt Resolution No. 89-12 annexinq parcel to the District.
TH/04/CM11-1793WP5 (9-19-89)
. - . - .- - - --.-
~ - - ,,--=
- Date: March 131¡1 . .
Hame I¡KiRngiðM~~ia~
Addre..' 11)1/1.1 H :¡wt-hnrnl'> Rl vii. Ste. 210
Lawndale, CA 90260
As the proponent(s) for this annexation of property identified
as 256:411:Z5.." '---,--- to the Encinitas
Assessor's Parcel Number(s)
District, I understand and aqree that annexinq into the District does
not quarantee sewer, service or commi t sewer capaci ty to the subj ect
property beinq annexed. Also, the District by acceptinq the application
does not represent that it will provide any treatment plant expansions
or sewer line extension to provide capacity or service for the subject
area to be annexed. Acceptance of this application and final annexation
of the property only allows the property to be served at such time as
the owner(s) of the annexed property pay all necessary costs for the
seweraqe facilities which can transport, treat and dispose of the
wastewater qenerated by the property. This may mean the proponent(s)
shall pay for a part or all of the required facilities to serve the
property.
BO/04/MS3-217wp5 (1-17-89-3)
- "-
, ,. --- - - - -, - ;, -~
. " --=
.. TO: Boar~ of Direct. .---
,
I " -.
J;¡jncini tAR District
The undersiqned property owners in the vicinity of TIninn'A 'tit-JiiEÐlr.
respectfully request and consent to the commencement of proceedinq for
the annexation of the property described opposite our names to the--
1<'-"'-; n; t-~C! District and further consent to this
annexation subject to any and all requlations, fees, and/or charges
established under the provisions of existinq
District ordinances.
. ,
, "
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED
State Lot, Block, Subdivision's name
Please Sign and Map No. or Section, Township and ASSESSOR'S
DATE NAME AND ADDRESS, Ranae or Address of ProDertv PARGEL NO.
:lI£W"~, Por Blk W, SAaRidA Gardens - *
Annex, Map 1801 256:411:25
*RRerow to close approximAtply O~tnhl'>r lQRQ
.
.
*If roperty please note the approximate date of
comp etion of es
Please return petition to:
City of Encinitas
Department of Public Works
527 Encinitas Boulevard
Encinitas, California 92024
Attn: Tom Henie
Telephone (619) 944-5079
BO/04/MS3-217wp5 (1-17-89-3)
!. i . - ' -
. .. . .., - ...-
- -
. ~ Local AI.e~cy Formatio.mis~ion . Date
1600 PacIfIc High"y. 452
San Dielo, CA 92101
Telephone: (619) 531-5400
'-""."'-"'."-.' ,--- ---. "--""------..-----.
.- -"._'._n- .- CHANGE ÒF ORGoANIZATION/REORGANIZATION APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE
I. Tl\is questionnaire may be used for the following changes of government organization: city and
special district annexations and detachments, or a combination thereof, referred to as a
reorganization. ,. "" .-. . ,..--. ." - .. .- - .
.. .- .
A2encv Chan2e of Or2anization
Encinitas Sanitation District Annexation
.
,
, A. The following items must be submitted with this application:
.
!
~, 1. A certified resolution OR a petition of landowners/registered voters making appli-
l
ca tion.
ao If initiated by resolution, submit property owner consent form,
2. 1 copy of a metes-and-bounds legal description of the perimeter of the subject area.
3, A reproducible plat map and 10 prints,
4, 2 copies of a vicinity map of the subject territory.
¡
.
05. Environme~tal documents:
a. Negativè Declaration: If an ND has been prepared for this project, submit 1
copy of the ND, Initial Study, and resolution certifying the ND.
b, Environmental Impact Report: If an EIR has been prepared for this project,
submit 1 S copies of the certified EIR, Only 1 copy of the EIR appendix is
required. Also submit a copy of the resolution certifying the EIR.
.
c, If no environmental review has been conducted, submit a completed Initiai
Study form,
6. If the proposal includes annex:nion to a c-.ity, submit 1 copy of the city resolution
approving the prezoning and general plan land use designations for the subject
terd tory, .
7, LAFCO processing fee (rcfer to fee schedule),
B, Additional inform:!.tion pertaining to the factors LAFCO must consider may be requested
during LAFCO stafr's review of the proposal.
(7/07/87) .
J
-
,-
This applleaUoD IDUlt be .Pleteél 18 coDsultatloD with city .Istrlet Itarr aDd IIIDed ocr by
tha t coDtact peuoD. AU CluesUoDs Dlust be âDlwert4 (use N/ A If Dot applicable).
-- -., - ' -- - ..' - . - - -
II, DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICA TTON
A. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
1. Is the subject territory to be developed at this time?
Yes
2. If yes, generally describe the anticipated development (buildin~ types, facilities,
number of units),
. 18-lot subdivision-residential planned development
Please indicate below ill discretionary permits or approvals from a city or the County which
will be needed to complete the project and the projected approval date:. If already granted,
.' please indicate the date of approval and submit copy of resolution ,Df approval.
I
I
Is Resolution
Project Da te of of Approval
ADDroval File No, ADDroval Attached?
. -
..c¡'ty or County Plan Amendment
i Prezoning (City)
I
¡,
.
Rêzone (County)
Tentative Subdivision Map
Tentative Parcel Map
Major Use Permit
.
-Other Coastal Permit
Rnvirnnmpnrril RAview
3. If no development is planned at this time, will approval of the proposed jurisdic-
tional change increasè the development potential of the property? N / ~ .
(If so, please indicate in terms of allowable uses, and number of units,)
4. If development is not planned at this time, when is dcvelopment of the aT':a 31:tici.
p:1ted? Upon completion of subdivision filing on the site and
adjacent land.
2
, . -
,.';: ."', "'-70,0"'- ., " '::':-"""":" - 0_-'-"" . "" "'" .. "" ":-"--'~-'~"'O""':".~:,......~.,-_.,.,.
- . ..
. .
.
* 5, In as much detail as possible. please explain why this proposal is necessary at 11:ili.
1iJ:!:!.£ (e.g.. an approved development or an existing structure requires service not
currently provided or available),
Parcel is one of tGlee lots to be developed for residential
development, but not part the Encinitas Sanitation District,
which will be servicing the project.
B, GENERAL INFORMATION
* 1. Please describe the general location and physical features of the territory which is
thc su bject of this proposal. Refer to major highways, roads, watercour~es, and
,0 topographical features.
,
See attached Supplemental Data Sheet
,
..
J
.. 2, How many acres of territory are included in this proposal? 2.66 x
* 3. How many people live within the subject territory? ø x.
.. .4. How many registered voters live within the subject territory? ø x.
C. LAND USE INFORMATION
,
For County general plan and zoning information call 565-5981. If subject area is within
a city, call that city's planning deputment..
* .
1. County .
a. Is the territory within a county community planning area? X':
If so, which one?
b. What is the County General Plan or community planning area designation?
, x.
c. Wh~t is the existing County zoning? x.
* 2, City
a, Is the territory within a city general plan arca? Yes
If so, which eity? 'J<'n("jnit~...
b. What is the city's land-usc designation? Rø~iñønt-i;:¡l ? 01-3.00/ac..
e. Has any city zoned or prezoned the territory? YP..R
If so, which eity? F.nl"'inif-;:¡~
d. How is thc tcrritory zoncd or prezoncd? Residential R-3
3
* 3. How il the terrilory ørcscDlly Dsed (e.a. .a"9.el; 3 linlle-family residences.
,etc)? ~IC:1S. specirïc as to structures. improve. . facilities now on property.
Horticultural use, wood-framed plastic sheeted greenhou~es
* 4. How are adjacent lands us~?
North: Single family residential
East: 'Horticul tural (to be subdivided)
South: Single family residential
West: Single family residential
* 5. Does any portion of the subject territory contain any of the following:
Agricultural Land Uses Flood Control Channel
. Agricultural Preserve River or Creek
' Scenic corridor zone X 100-year flood line
Open Space Easement Coastal bluff
Airport noise contour A rcba eo I ogica Ilh istor i cal
; Coastal permit zone X features
.
Sewer Moratorium area Other unusual features
Slopes grea ter than 25% (specify)
Mature Trees
III. PUBLIC SERVICES INVENTORY
A. SEWAGE DISPOSAk
t. Public Sewer System
.
a. Is the subject territory within a district or êity that provides public sewer
service? Nn . If so. what agency?N/A
.
b. Is annexation for sewer service necessary? Yes
(If No, skip to Question # 2 (Septic System». If yes. what district or city?
* Rn,..i ni h:'IR
* c, What is the distance for connection to the agency(ies) existing sewer system?
260!t-
- ,
d, Has the affected agcncy issued a letter of sewer availability? N/A
If yes, provide a copy of the letter with your application.
c. Will the agency be prepared to furnish service immediately? If not, explain.
Yes
No
f. Is the territory in a sewer moratorium area?
4
~,~,.,,~....,- "~-"::'" "~'y-..'..,., --- : . ":;',~""'~""","~':,""~"'~~~"""'!'.,:;."'!/"...~"-
- ..
.' . . .
" ,
. No
8. Is the subject territory to be annexed to an improvement district? .
* h. Specify any improvements (on and off site) that will be necessary to connect
and serve the anticipated development. Indicate the total cost of these
improvements and rrl'ethod of financing (e.g" general property tax, assessment
district, landowner or develol?çr fees). N/A
1. Capacity of Treatment Facility:
'. (I) What is the physical design capacity of the sewage treatment plant which
will serve the annexation area? 3. ~ MGD. .
'.
(2) What is the current average daily sewage treatment volume of wastewater
being treated at the plant? '3, Z. MGD.
..
r (3) Does the affected agency currently have sufficient capacity to service the
¡j.
tt. territory? Yes . If not, what plan does the agency have to
increase its capacity?
.
J. Capacity of Transmission Lines:
(1) What is the physical design capacity of the affected sewer main (trans-
¡ mission line or pipeline) which conveys wa~tewater to, the treatment
facility? Varies MGD. Adequate capaclty for thlS proJec .
(2) What is the current loading rate of the sewer main? Varies MGD.
(3) Does the affected agency currently havë'sufficient capacity in its sewer
main to serve the territory? Yes . If not, what plan does the agency
have to increase its capacity?
k, Capacity of Outfall Lines:
(I) What is the physical design. capacity of the affected outfall line which
conveys treated effluent to the ocean or ocean outfall system? Vari esMGD.
Adequate capacity for this project.
(2) What is the current loading rate of the outfall line? Varies MGD,
(3) Does the affected agency currently have sufficient capacity in the outfall
, line to serve the territory? Yp,," If not, what plan does the
agency have to increase its capacity?
5
.
2. Septic System
* . a. Is :a S. system(s) eurrenUy used on the pety? No .
* b, Will sepdc system be used upon aftnexuion and development of the property?
No . ~
* c. If 2.b. is answered yes, please ~nswer the following:
.
(I) Have percolation tests been conducted?
" (2) Dept, of Public Health approval?
B. WATER SUPPLY
1. Is the subject territory within a district or city that provides water service? v".c:
. 3. If so, what district or city? ~an Diqptn w~tør nic:t-ri~r .
,
2. Is annexation for water service necessary? Nn .
a. If so, what district or city?
.
.
J. Is the agency prepared to immediately furnish the necessary service? Yes .
if not, explain.
.(, Is water service currently provided to the territory? Yes .
t. If so, what is the currcnt water demand? MGD
i (I) For what purpose?
5. Will the project be connected to an existing water lin¿? Yes .
a. Distance to tic-in .
b, When will service be extended to territory? .
c. The total anticipated water demand will be:
.
(I) Residential use MGD,
(2) Industrial/Commercial use N/A MGD.
(3) Agricultural use N/A MGD.
6. Is the subject territory to be annexed to an improvement district? No
a. If so, which one(s)?
7, Specify any improvements (on and off site) that will be necessary to connect and
serve the anticipated development, Indicate the total cost of these improvements
and method of financing (e.g" general property tax, assessment district, landowner
Or developer fees). N/A
6
". "--":-~'n.:--"-'- .-,. ,- . ,. . '0 "... ;. '", ,. ....- ..~:~~. :"""-"'~_';"":""'~""-"',"......,..,_..""'.h."" :'.....~..~...:- :. -"""'."""""~,",""",':'"_~.";' ~!'I":~~, ".""
-'- - . ... -
. . .
.
.
C. FIRE PROTECTION
1. Is the territory currently within a fire district or city? Yes
3, If so, which one? Encinitas Fire Protection District
".
2. If not, is annexation for fire protect.ion part of this application? N/A
3, Is structural fire protection necessary? Vp.~
4. Location of nearest fire station: 415 2nd ~t , RnrinitAR, ~A (ólQ) qÁÁ-I)OOO
a. Estimated response time: 0-5 Minutes (Priority)
0-5 Minutes (Non-priority)
,.
,;
'. D. POLICE PROTECTION
Encinitas Station
" 1. What police agency currently serves this territory? San Diego Co Sheriff's Dept.
..
J 175 N. El Camino Real, Encinitas, CA
II a. Location of nearest police station?
(619) 753-1252
b. Estimated response time: 0-1) M;nl1t".~ (Priority)
5-7 Minutes (Non-priority)
2. What police agency would serve this territory if this jurisdictional change is
l approved? Encinitas Station. San DieRo County Sheriff's Department
,
.
a. Location of nearest police station? 175 N. El Camino Real, Encinitas. CA
b. Estimated response time: 0-1) MinntpR (Priority)
..
1)-7 MinnteR (Non-priority)
E. SCHOOLS
1. Will development on the territory generate any school-age children? Yes
How many:
-
a, Grades K -6 J5%
b, Grades 7 - 9 35%
c. Grades 10 - 12 30%
EncinitasUnion S.D.
2. What school district(s) is the subject territory within? San DieRuito Union S.D.
3, Arc any elementary or second:lrY schools serving the subject territory opcr:lting
above design capacity? Yes . If so, which schools? Pacific View Elem..
Paul Ecke Central Elem.. DieRueno Jr. HiRh, San Dieguito High School
7
F. jor drai..... ar.. within which thtbiect territory is located:
.1.
ff;'
2. Are there existing flood control facilities on the territory? ttlQ
If so, describe. .
3, If this territory is annexed to a city, has the city planned for improvements to
provide for flood control in the area (on or off site)? N/A
,
. G, TRANSPORT A TIO~
. I. Designate the names and types of roads which the project will use for primary and
,. secondary access (include direct access streets from the project site to the nearest
I
freeway):
"
..
Ü Street Name TvDe (Ri2ht of Way Width) Current level of Service
U
Union Avenue 40'
ErlCihitas"Dr. 40'
Ocean View Avenue 40'
2. Is widening of an existing street necessary? No
.
; 3. Is the project served by County-maintained roads? ~o .
4. Is construction of new access streets necessary? Nt'\ . .
.
5. What is the distance to the nearest shopping center? ~ miles..
'"
6. Is public transportation available? Yes. How distant? . 5 miles.
IV. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
Â. Is the territory to be annexed or reorganized located within the sphere of influence of
the city/district to which it is proposed to be annexed? Vf'>!":, .
B, Will a sphere of influence amendment for any affected agency be required? No
Which agency(ies}?
8
.
. ., : - ", .' . '~'-.Ai:"';~~-M~~.~~~
. .
. -
" , .
. .
V. SPECIAL REVENUES. ANNEXING CITY OR DISTRICT MUST COMPLETE THIS SECTIO~
A. Does the city/district have current plans to establish any new assessment districts which
would include this arca, in order to pay for new or cxtendeù services? Please dctail.
fi,
No
.
ß, Docs the affected territory contain existing commercial activities which generate ten
miJIion dollars per year or more in retail sales? ~~o .
C. Will the area assume any existing bonded indebtedness upon annexation to city/district?
Please explain. and indicate taxpayer cost.
"
...
.. D, Will the territory be subject to any new or additional special taxes, benefit charges, Or
fees? Please outline.
.. Annual sewer service charge after connection to the public sewer system.
..
I
¡~
n
E. Which service(s) to be provided to the annexing area by your city/district are presently
being provided by another local agency? (please list each service and current provider),
None
F. Is' the city/district requesting a'n exchange of property tax revenues as the result of this
i proposal? No .
f
G. Is a master property tax exchange agreement applicable to this jurisdictional change?
No .'
H, If property tax exchange negotiations are necessary, upon receipt of this application all
affected agencies will be notified of this proposal and provided preliminary information to
begin the negotiation process,
-j~ ~ t/Tl¿/T/£.s- ?¿'ÆINE Æ
Ci ty /District Rcprcsen ta ti vc TitJe
(signature) 9¥~-SO?7
Phone Numbcr
9
,.
VI. PUBLIC CONTACT
A. List all agcncic8oups. and individuals contacted rC.ing this proposal.
None
II.
.
LAFCO will consider the person signing this application below as the proponent of the proposed
* action(s),' Notice and other communications regarding this application (including fee payment) will
be directed to the proponent
Signature:
Oa te:
..
. Print or Type
.. Name:
., Represen ting: TSr.() Tnn1J~t-rip~ . Tn/"'
..
~1 Address: 1~l42 Ha~t-hprnp Rlvn !=:t-P. 210
n
T.:'Iwnn:'llPr r.~ QO/hO
Phone No, "1l)h44_l44'
* If you wish anyone other than the proponent of this application to receive notices and reports of
these proceedings, please include here: .
.
Name: .1; m M;a ""111Ø'7, Pl:'lnninq :'Inn, Design
. ., - .
Address: 1ll.1 P:'I,..lnTÏe'" St9 100
. M;anh;at-r:'ln Rø~('b, CA 90266
(213)~4ñ 744~
(7/07/87)
10
"
, ,.- ,~'
. e.
-- . . .
APPEND IX I
~AL ~IS'I' 1ŒUl
(To Be Ccmpleted By Lead Agency)'
I . Background
1. Name of Proponent IVAN) STAMEGNA
2. Address and Phone Nu::ber of Proponent 15342 HAW1HŒNE BLVD. 11210
1AWNIWE. CA 90260
(213) 644-5522
3 . De. te of Checklist Subui tted 19 JULY 1989
4. Agency Requiring Checklist CITY OF ENCINITAS
5. Na.:ne of Proposal r it applica.ble STAMEGNA PROPER.'l'Y
CASE 00. 89-145
II. Envirocmenta.l Impacts
- . . _.
(Expla..'12.tions of a.ll "yes" a.nd "maybe" answers a.re required on a.tta.ched
. shee~ . ) SEE ATI'AÓIED
!!! Maybe No
..
I
1. E2.... -th. Will the proposa.l result in:
a.. Unstable earth conditions or in cbanges in
geologic substnctures? - ~
b. Disnptions, displacements, caapa.ction or
overcovering of ~e soil? - ~
c. O:1a.nge in topogra.phy or ground surfa.ce
relief features? X
- -
d. '!'be destruction, covering or modifica.tion X
of any unique geologic or physica.l fea.tures? -, -
e.' Any increase in r-:1d or wa.ter erosion of X
soils, either on. or off the site? .
, . --
f. Cla.nges in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or
erosion micb my modify the channel of a.
n ver or stream or the bed of the ocea.n or X
any ba.y, inlet or la.ke?
- -
g. . Exposure of people or property to geologic
b.a.za.rds such as ea.rtbqua.kes, landslides,
.. -'. mudslides, ground failure r or similar ha.za.rds? X,
. - -
. -. --.~ . .. .
--. .
.
I
. .
Yes Maybe No
- -
2. Air. Will the proposa.l resul tin:
al. Substanti&l air emissions or deterioration X
of ambient alir quality? - -
b. , The crealtion of objectioaable odo:-s? X !
- - !
Al ten. tion of air IIX)Vemen t, ax:>1 s'ture, or I
c.
tempera.ture, or any change in cl1ma.te, X
either locally or reg10n&11i~
- -
3. Ya.ter. Will the proposal result in:
a.. Changes in currents, or the course of di-
rection of water moveme~ts, in either marine X
or freshr,wa.ters?
- -
b. Q1a.nges in absorption ra.tes, cl..""2.ina.ge pa.t-
terns, or the ra. te and amount of S"~face X
runoff?
...:_.'::_:.::..;.:.. -- .-. ... '" " - -
... . '.... .. - .. ..,. -
c. Al ten. tions to the course or low of flood
waters? X
- -
d. Change in the amount of surface wa. te:- in X
any ~'a.ter body? - -
. e. Discharge into surface waters, 0:- in any
alteration of surface water quality, in-
cl uding but not limi tee! to te:npera:ture, X
' . dissolved oxygen or turbi~ ty? .,
- -
.II Altera.tion of the direction or rate of flow'
.. X
...... of ~und'wa.ters?
- -
g. Cbange in' the quantity of g...""Ound wa.ters,
either through direct additions or with- ~
cira.wa.ls, or through interception of an X
aquifer by cuts or excava.tions?
- -
h.. SubSta.nti8ol reduction in the amount of
. wa.ter otherwise a.vailable- for public X
water supplies?' - -
,
.
1. Exposure of people or property to wa.ter re-
lalted ba.z2.rds such as flooding or tida.l waves? X
- -
4., P1a.nt Lite. Will the proposal result in:
" a.. Change in the diversity of species, or num-
~. . ",,'. . bar of any species of plants (including trees,
.. .
": X
shrubs, grass, crops, !Lnd a.qua.tic plants)?
" - -
¡.~~::~.,..
- - .
. .
" .
i
I
,
.,.,-
'-~
.
. .
Yes )hybe" No
- -
b. Reductioa of the ntrabers, of any unique, rare
or endangered ~ies of plants? X
- -
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area., or in a. barrier to the norma.l replenish- X
cent of existing species?
- -
d. Reduction in acreage ot any agricultu.-al crop? X
- -
5. A""-l Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. C':1a.nge in the di ve:-si tyot species, 0:' num-
bers of any species of a.n1ma.ls (birds, land
~ima.ls including.reptiles, fish and s~ell- . X
~~sh, þenthic orgu.is:ns ~r insects)? '- -
b. F.eductior. of the ncbers of any unique, X
:"2.:'e or encia.ngered. species of animals?
- -
c. I~troduct10n "of new species of' animals into
'0_' .. ~ area., or result in e. barrier to the migra.- X
" tion or IJX)ve:nent of anima.ls?
- -
d. Deteriora.tion to e~sting fish or wildlife
h"'bi~at? X
- -
6. Noise. Will the propOsal result in: j
a. I:erea.ses in existing noise levels? X
- -
b. E:¡posure of People"' to 'seVere noise lev~ls? - X
- -
.
7. Light and Glare. ,Will t:1e proposal produce new X
light or glare? - -
0
8. Land Use. Will the proposå.l result in a S'.1b-
stantial 2.1 tera.tion of t~e present or plan:1ed X
land \:Se of an area.?
- -
9. lia. tura.l Resources. Will the proposal result in:
. a.. Increase. in the ra.te of use of any na.tu..-a.l X.,
resources? ~
, - -
10. Risk o:f Upset. Will the proposal involve:
.
8.. A :-isk' of an explosion or the release of
ba.z:a..rdous substances (inel uding , but not
. 1 iru1 tad to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
.
ra.à1a.tion) in the event of an accident or X
. upset conditions?
- -
.-. . "
I
--
-.
. . -.. ..
°.. '.
""
0,
",
-~" """- .
e e.
. Yes Jrhybe No
- -
b. Possible interfer~Dce with an emergency
response pla.n or a.n emergency evacuation X
pla.n?
- -
11. Population. "ill the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate of the h~ X
popula tion of a."l &:'æ?
- -
12. Housing. Will the proposal a1fect existing hous- X
ing, or create a demand for additional housing?
- -
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will t~e proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional X
vehicular movement?
- -
b. Effects on existing pa:king facilities, or X
demand for new parking? - -
c. . SUbs'ta.Dtial 1mpa.ct upJD existing tra.nspor- X
ta.tion systems'? - -
d. Alterations to present p&tterns ofcircula-
tioD or movene~t of people and/or goods? X
- -
e. Al tera.tions to wa.terborne, ra.il or air traffic? X
- -
f. Increase in traffic haza-~s to motor v~icles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? X
- -
14. Public Services. Will the proposal ha,vean effect
upon, or rt:$ul t in a need for new or altered gov-
erI1CeIltal services in any of the following areas:
8.. Fire protec:ion? X
- -
b. Police protection? X
- -
.
c. Schools? X
- -
d. Pa.rks or other recreatiõoal facilities? X
- -
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including X
roads?
- -
f. Other gove:-:uœn tal services? -:r X
r.ÃA:l#l1'/9s J;IINIq¡~y OIJrlt!.l ~ - -
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X
a.
- -
e e.
. Yes Jå.ybe No
- -
b. SUOstantia.l increase in dema.ad upon existing )
sources or energy, or require the develoJ]'De:lt X
of new so~""Ces of e.'1e:-g~'? - -
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or substa.n tia.1 al tera. tions to the X
follo'~ng utilities: - -
17. Human Heal th. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation c~ any health hazard or potentia.l X
heal th ha.z3.rd (e."Ccluding menta.l hea.l th)? - -
b. Exposure o~ people to potentia.l heal th X
hazards?
- -
18. . Aesthetics. i:.ll the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista. or view open to
the public, or will the" proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open X
. to public vie~1.. ""
- -
19. Recrea.tion. ":'11 the proposal rasul t in an
impact upon. the quality or quantity of existing X
recreational opportunities? - -
20. COill tura.l Resou.-ces. I
a. Will the p=oposa.l result in the altera.tion
of or the destruction of a. prehistoric or X
'historic a:cbaeological site? - -
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or a.esthetic effects to a. prehistoric or X
historic building, structure, or object? - -
c. 1):).0..5 the proposal h2.ve the potential to
cause a physical change which would a!fect X
unique ethnic cul tura.l va.l ues? - -
, d. Will the propÖsa.l ,restrict.. ensting religious
or sacred uses wi thin thE! potential impact X
area? .
- -
'"
21. ~nrl~tory Findings of Signitica.nce.
.
a. Does the project ha.ve the potential to de¡ra.de
. the quality of the environment, substantially
.reduce the habitat of a fish or ~"ildlife
. species, ca.use a fish or wildlife population
, to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal cœmunity, re- '
,
. !
~ - duce the n~r or restrict the range of a rare I
or endangered plant or a.rdmal or eliminate !
I
'. I
.
'. . .
Yes Maybe No
- -
impOrtant examples of the major periods of X
Ca.lifor:1a. history or prel11story'?' - -
b. Does the project have the potential to achie"'e
sbort-tero, to the disadvantage of loc.g-ter:,
enviroQ:)Ø-nta.l goa.ls? (A sbort-terœ impact o~
tb.e environment is one whicb. occurs in a rela.-
tively brief. definitive period of time ~~ile
long-te~ iQpacts will endure well into the X
future.) - -
c. Does the project have impacts ,.hicb. a:e
individua.lly l1tn1ted, but c"J..7.l1atively con-
siderable? (A project my :L=pa.ct on two or
'" !IX)re se;:a.ra.te resources v.'b.ere the impact on
eacb. ro-sour:e is relatively s=a.ll. but where
the effect of the total of ~'ose ~pacts on X
: the env~ro~ent is significan:.)
- -
d. roes t.,e project have enviroc.":1enta.l effects
~.:':'=::.' :.;':.i.-'- .....:::,- . wbicb w:ll ca.use S'..1osta.ntia.l adverse' effects
on h"~~ bei~gs, either directly or indirec:ly? X
- -
III. Discussion of E::lnronme:ta.l Eva.lus:tion
(Narrative descr~~tion of ~viro~~ntal im~cts.)
SEE ATrAOIED
: IV. Deter:r1m.tion
-. .. (To be canpleted by ~e Lead Age1cy.)
.
. ~ the basis of t'¡;s initia.l eva.lua.tion:
. '
.I tind tb.2.t the proposed project O:X1T..D to!' b&ve a si¡-,-i. ~ica.nt e!fect
. OD. the ea.viroace::lt, a.nd a. m:::ïATIVE D~.m..\TIo..~ will be prepared. ŒJ
I :find ~t although the proposed project could ba.ve a. si~ica..'1t
ef:fect OIl the environment, there rill not be a. si¡;n.Cica.nt effect in
this C2.Se œ-~use the m1 tip. tiOIl lI1E!2SU:'es described 0:1 a.n a. tta.cb.ed
sheet have'been 2.dded to the project. A NmATIVE DE::.,.4.P_~ION wnL BE
. PREP ARm. 0
.
.- I 'find the proposed p~ject MAY b.å:v:e a. significant ef::ect on the
0
. ' ~,. environment, and an ENVIRON1Ð"TAL I:MPACT P.EP:>Rl' is reç:uired.
.19 JULY 1989 .
. Da:t e
.... ..
" , For CI'IY. OF ENCINITAS
.'
'.' '. . . .
-:;'. . .'
.0,,;...,
~;,-"'.'
'_.~..
.:=--~.;~:: .::-::". .
. . a' ..,'. .;
"'.;":.'".' .'
" .
. .
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
Stamagna Property
Case No. 89-145
II. Environmental IMpacts
Explanations of "VIS" and "Maybe" Answers
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need
for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas:
f. Other governmental services?
The applicant requests annexation to the Encinitas Sanitary District.
Connection to the District tranSl8ission systeM or any other related
improvements are not proposed at this time.
III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation
Narrative Description of Environmental Impacts
14. Public Services (f.).
.
The subject property abuts the District boundary on the north, south, and
east and is within its sphere of influence. There is a public tran_ission
line in Ocean View Avenue approxiMately 200 feet to the east. Site
elevation suggests gravitational flow to this 11ne would be possible.
Adjacent property to the east over which a future connection line would
probably cross is under the same ownership and is devoted entirely to
greenhouse use.
Although annexation would remove that particular obstacle to future
developaent of the subject property for other than agricultural use, it in
itself will not foster such development. Conversion of the site to SORe
other use would be subject to the City General Plan land use designation and
zoning for the site in affect at the ti...
Goal 40f the Land Use Element of the General Plan states, aMOng other
things, that the City will ensure that the rate of residential growth (a)
does not create a deMand which exceeds the capacity of existing services and
facilities; and (d) provideS the City with the ability to plan ahead for the
location, tiMing, and financing of required services and facilities.
Land Use Element Policies 4.1 through 4.8 implement Goal 4 with (4.1) a
figure to be established annually detenmining the maxi.u. nUMber of building
penmits to be issued during the coming year; and (4.3) planning to provide
services and facilities sufficient to allow issuance of the maximum annual
number of dwelling unit building penmits or establishment of a lesser
allowable rate i.n any year when capacity of avai 1ab1e services and
facilities is not adequate.
Approval of this annexation is dependent on District policies. Any future
development at the site will be dependent on the ability of the District to
provide transmission and treatment at that time.
, . .
.
INITIAL STUDY
St81118gna Prope rt y
Case No. 89-145
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project is an annexation of a 2.66 acre (115,870 sQ. ft.) parcel to the
Encinitas Sanitary District.
Connection to the District transmission systM or any other related improv88nts
are not proposed at this time.
PROJECT LOCATION
The Stamegna property is located between Sunset Drive and acean View Avenue south
of Union Street in the cOlllllunity of Leucadia (see Figure 1).
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The subject property is used for growing cut flowers and potted plants in
greenhouses.
This property is designated Residential 2.01-3.00 Units/Acre on the City of
Encinitas General Plan. It is classified Residential 3 (R-3).
land to the south and east supports greenhouses. There are single family
detached dwelling units to the north and west.
Surrounding properties are designated Residential 2.01-3.00 Units/Acre on the
General Plan and classified Residential 3 (R-3).
POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
No potential significant effects have been identified.
MITIGATION MEASURES
No mitigation measures are necessary.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Research and review of the project application, site, and surroundings have
failed to disclose any environ88ntal issues.
On the basis of this initial evaluation the proposed project will not have a
significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION should be
prepared.
, e e."
,
CITY OF ENCINITAS
DErERMINATION BASED ON INITIAL STUDY
STA."Œ.GNA PROPERTY CASE NJ. 89-145
Name of Project
ßETItÆEN SUNSET IRIVE AND OCEAN VIEW AVENUE SOU'lH OF UNIOO S'IREET, L...ti'lJCADIA
Location
Entity or Person Undertaking Project:
IV AW STAMEGNA
Name
15342 HAWnIœNE BLVD. 11210, IAWNDALE, CA 90260
Address
Staff Determination
The City of Encinitas staff, having undertaken and completed an Initial Study
of this project in accordance with the City's CEQA Guidelines for the purpose
of determining whether the proposed project might have a significant effect on
the environment, has reached the following conclusion:
X 1. The project could not.have a significant effect on the environment;
therefore, a Negative Declaration will be prepared.
2. The project could not have a significant effect on the environment,
due to mitigation measures accepted by the applicant which include:
there ore, a Negative Dec aration wi be prepared.
3. The project could have a significant effect on the environment;
therefore, an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared.
-/~ .
~ I~ I?~
Date City of Encinitas
-
. -.
-
;
8/87
-
. .
CITY OF ENCINITAS
-
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Prõ3ect Title: 89-145 ADP/EIA
Location: West of Ocean View Ave. between ~unset: ur1ve aud tJuluu St.
in the City of Encinitas
Description: Annexation of an approx. 6.2 acre a an, presen y
containing greenhouses, to the Encinitas sanitary District
PrõJect Sponsor: Ivana Stamegna
FINDING:
Based upon information provided in the Initial Study, along with Comments and
Responses to the Notice of Preparation of a Negative Declaration which have
been presented to the City Council/Planning Commission/Community Advisory
Board, City of Encinitas, at a duly called meeting on Aug. 31, 1989 ,
the Council/Commission/Board finds that the project will not have a
significant effect on the environment.
MITIGATION MEASURES:
Mitigation measures included in the project as a condition of project approval
to avoid potentially significant effects include:
A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to substantiate the finding,
~ .J! !<rð'(. ~/~~ , ~. p~...-< ~
Date / ~1ayor, City Counc i 1 / I
Chairman, Planning Commission
Cha.iJ:m.g!l" Community Advisory Board
~ of Encinlt~
8/87
'\.~
~.