2020-05 - EGNOTICE OF DECISION
E n'rryc'f initas Development Services Department
DEMOPMENT SERMES DEPARTMEW
Project Name:
............... - . .. . .......
Brubaker Fagade Improvements
Request-
Fagade changes to an existing twinhome
Discretionary Actions:
Administrative Design Review Permit (ADD)
Coastal Development Permit (C P)
CEQA Determination:
EXEMPT
DECISION:
APPROVED
Project Number:
. ........ . . . . ...........
MULTI-003331-2019, ADR-003332-2019,
CDPNF-003334-2019
DSD Number:
2020-05
Location:
365 Stafford Avenue
1912 Cambridge Avenue
Community:
Cardiff -by-the-Sea
APN:
260-36322 (Lots 1 and 2)
260-363-23 (Lot 14)
Applicant:
Ed Brubaker
Representative:
Dave Eslinger, Eco-Minded Solutions Inc.
Project Planner:
J. Dichoso, Associate Planner,
Decision Date:
...... . ... .... . ..............
February 25, 2020
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
............
I I � d I I 1 11 1111 1 '' ''I � I I 1111MMOMMY5111
Administrative Design Review Permit — To allow exterior renovations of the existj
twinhome. The twinhome fagade renovation removes a prominent mansard roof featu
with contemporary rchitectural style with flat rof. N site imprnts a
propsed.
a a oo ovem e
o I a
ITEM NAME: BRUBAKER FAQADE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NUMBER: MULTI-003331-2019, ADR-003332-201 9, CDPNF-003334-2019
2. Coastal Devef-----& M — The proposed project is located within the Coastal Zone
of the City of Encinitas and requires approval of a Coastal Development Permit to
determine compliance with the City's Local Coastal Program.
WMERM ED = ..
None
None -----------------
The property is currently developed with a split-level twinhome which was built under the County
of San Diego in 1984 'prior to the City's incorporation. A summary of the floor areas for each
twinhome unit is described in the Municipa ode Ana ow.
. c............
Community Charater
Context
........... ___.,.,.,.,.,.,,_ ......
1 210,11111 Wrimla I R.
' O
11 0 i1
2 of 17
I
.......... .............
..........
. c............
Community Charater
Context
........... ___.,.,.,.,.,.,,_ ......
1 210,11111 Wrimla I R.
' O
11 0 i1
2 of 17
I
ITEm NAME: BRUBAKER FAQADE IMPROVEMENTS
NUMBER: MULTI-003331-2019, ADR-003332-2019, CDPNF-003334-2019
The City of Encinitas General
Plan includes a number of goals and policies that guide
development and land use within the City. A discussion of how the project is consistent with the
applicable General Plan policies is summarized below:
Land Use Goal 6: Every effort
h i e i a p- p -1-i c' a i i i i n' i tF b" t-i -oi
shall be made to ensure that the
unique yet consistent with the surrounding development
existing desirable character of the
and the Cardiff-by-the-Sea community, The proposed
communities are maintained,.
project has been carefully designed to maintain the existing
desirable character of the community. The twinhome would
continue to be compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood and improve the neighborhood by renovating
the exterior of an older structure.
The project design would contribute positively to t e
existing community character and would be compatible with
the established neighborhood and surrounding area. The
existing residential character would remain, consistent with
the surrounding neighborhood. The configuration of the
resulting three lots are consistent with the lot sizes and
............
configuration of surrounding properties.
. . ...... . .....
Below is a table summarizing how the proposed project
ITEM NAME: BRUBAKER FA(�ADE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJEC]" NUMBER: MULTI-003331-2019, ADR-003332-2019, CDPNF-003334-2019
............
General Plan Goal or Polic . . . ........
— ------- . ...... - — -------- -----
_ThWde_s__ig_n:
.. . .................... ------- _. ................. . ------- — ------
Land Use Policy 6.i�
The propos ed faqa . d . e r . enov . ati . on --- pr . oj . ect -_ co . n . s . ide - re�_dt6e
of future development shall
constraints and opportunities that are provided by adjacent
consider the constraints and
I existing development. The project site is surrounded by a
opportunities that are provided by
mix of single-family and multi-family development. The
adjacent existing development.
proposed project meets all of the R-11 zone development
standards, which are the same or similar standards
applicable to properties that immediately surround the site.
..AVenue..(S9y1N .......
260-363-26 (Lot 14)
The project would complement the existing adjacent
development and provide an updated appearance for the
Lots
property and the surrounding neighborhood.
an se Goal 7: Development
MY wifnin rnis neighborhood of the Cardiff-by-the-
in the community should provide
Sea community is varied in density and design. T�hhe
an identity for the City while
existing development, residential land uses, and
maintaining the unique identity of
architectural styles all make up the unique identity of the
the individual communities,
community. The identity of the area includes a variety of
architectural styles. The project proposes to complement
some of the more updated design styles, while using
use, is permitted
materials complementary to the neighborhood. The
twinhome would be consistent with many homes within the
11 zone.
neighborhood. The proposed project would contribute to the
unique identity of the ne�ghborhoocl, and blend into the
............................ .
community area,
Municipal Code Analysis
.......................... . ............................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - ....................... . ............... . ...................... . . ................. . ................
Below is a table summarizing how the proposed project
meets the applicable
zoning standards
for the R -11 Zone:
Development Standard
......... ... .
365 Stafford Ave , n ue
. .... ... .. .
1 11 912 .1 C a rnbri . d , g , e
I I . .....
C ornp . fie
_404 . ......... . ................... -----------
260-363-22
..AVenue..(S9y1N .......
260-363-26 (Lot 14)
[n/a
Lots
and Use
Twinhome, single-family
hm, single-
fwa
es rZ
attached land useis
amily attached land
permitted within the R-
use, is permitted
11 zone.
within the R -11
------- ---------
Gross/Net Lot Area -
------- - I -------- __ ----------
Lot 1 — 2,123 SF
--zone. ,, ------
2,584 SF
S' u....__
Y es '
--- 6
3,950 SF
Lot 2 - 2,396 SF
Lot Depth - 90 feet
Lot 1 — 89 feet
100.16 feet
Yes
No
Lot 2- 96 feet
Lot Width — 40 feet
Lt 1 — 27 SF
. . . ........... .
5
2 feet
Y es ....
. ............
No
. . ............
Loot 2 - 25 SF
Ground Level -
-.1.1.1.1.1 .. . .............
732 SF (Stafford Ave)
............. . ............
401 SF (Alley)
. ............
Yes
Garaqe F!9or Area
440 S Alley,�
F'J
First- and Ground Level
...............
612 SF
0 SF
.............. . .............. ...... [�!
. .......... .
..............
Floor Area
HEM
ITEM NAME: BRUBAKER FAqADE IMPROVEMENTS ,
PROJEcT NUMBER: MULTI-003331-2019, ADR-003332-201 9, ice' IA
Development Standard
3,65 Stafford Avenue
.......
19 12 d"i"r br, i'd'-"ge ............ .
... ...... C"o'm"p'l'1'es ...................
""' ..... ...... .
i;azwv i Landing
0 SF
271 SF
n/a
---------------- -----------
SecondFloorArea
------ - ------------- ----------------
1,120SF
-----------
878 SF
------------------
n/a
............ _________ .......
Third Floor Area
..... - -------------
982 SF
- ----------- -
n/a
.............. - -----------
n/a
.........
------------
1 otal Floor Area with
_._._._.._._.
3,886 SF
m-...............-._._._._._.
2,354 SF
n/a
- _._._._t
garage
. . ............. ..... ' .......... . ......
ont-Yard Setback
. ......... .. ' . . .. . . .......................... _' .... ...
44 feet (Compliant with
........................... . . .. . .......................
15 feet (Compliant
Yes
..........
z No
from Cambridge
20-FYSB from
with 15-FYSB from
Avenue
. ..........
Cambridge Avenue)
Cambridge Avenue)
............ ...............
Rear-Yard Setback
. . .............. ____ 11111111111111111--1 ............................ ..
4 feet- 3 inches
____' ..............
20 feet
Yes
........... .
No �,;'j
ATPA!!P1y,_.20 feet
........................... . .
. . . . . .... ...
Sid a"rd"
" ... " . . . . .............................. .
2 feet -11 inches
. ... n/"a" . . . . . .............................. . . . . . . . . . . .....................
.... Y_ ... es
o .......... . 2"��
NExterior
Setback from Stafford
Avenue - 10 feet
Interior Side-Yard
0 feet
0 feet (North)
Yes
No
.......
....... ..... ............
Lot Coverage (Net Lot
Lot 1 - 52 percent
50 percent
Yes[]
No
Floor Area Ratio (dross
Lot , ,
1 -
.... ..... ..... .... .... ....
2,354 S F 400 S F
- Yes .... E . I
No IZ
Lot Area) -
1,_585 SF - 400 SF
garage = 1,953 SF
0.5 (Substandard Lot)
garage ® 1,185 SF
1,953 SF/2,584 SF
1,185 S F/2,123 SF =
= 0.76 percent
0.56 (exceeds
(exceeds maximum
maximum 0.5 FAR for a
0.5 FAR for a
substandard Lot)
substandard Lot)
Lot 2
2,301 SF .- 400 SF
garage = 1,901 SF
1,901 SF/2,396 SF
0.80 (exceeds
maximum 0.5 FAR for a
.............................................. ...........
. ............
22126 feet . ............................ .
........... .............
..........
North
30 feet-3 inches
. ............. .................. .
n/a
N ..
28 feet-7 inches
............ ........................
..... !,, imn j') ................
.........
Sout6""i
n/a
feet-3 inches
................
East
26 feet
21 feet-3 inches
Yes
No
28 feet-7 inches
_(qhi m ney
West
30 feet -4 inches
26 feet-8 inches
Yes
No
32 feet -10 inches
------------- ----------- _.S,.qhimn
-----------
--------- -------- ................
---------- .......................
-------
1`3 of 17
ITEM NAME: BRUBAKER FAQADE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NUMBER: MULTI-003331-2019, •
AQR-003332-2PJa_GX.EVF.L!,i -
,221_2j�%
----------
Parking — Two
enclosed and one
enclosed or
0 11 1
111� NMI ft"—
is provided. An
additional space is
provided in the
Maio
See Legal Nonconforming Discussion below.
See Development Standards Disc -Inliv V1 r
MWA
. .......... . . . ................... .
Stafford Aygnq
. .......... y, _ _(
Avenue
Substandard Legal Lot —
Based upon staff review of e
Based upon staff review of the
EMC Chapter 30.16
project, the northern residence
at 365 Stafford Avenue (AP
project, the southerly unit (1912
Cambridge) is located
(Residential Zones)
260-363-22) is located on two
on an
approximately 2,5 4- lot that is
specifies a minimum lot
underlying legal lots, Lots 1
25-feet wide by 100-feet deep lot
size of 3,950 square feet
and 2, of Block 109 of Cardiff
that was originally approved as Lot
and minimum lot
dimensions of 40 feet in
i Vista of Map 1547 dated
March 18, 1913.
14 in of Map 1547 recorded dated
width and 90 feet in
March 18, 1913. The lot complies
depth for the subject R-
Lot I is an approximately
with lot depth, but is substandard in
terms of area and width,
zone,
2,123-SF lot that is
approximately 27-feet wide by
89-feet deep. The triangular-
shaped lot is substandard in
terms of area, depth, and
width. Lot 2 is an
approximately 2,396-SF lot
that is approximately 25-feet
wide by 96-feet deep. The lot
complies with lot depth, but is
substandard in terms of area
and width.
Garage Area —
.. .........
365 Stafford Avenue bne-fit s
19 1 2"—Cambr'id9 e Avenue I i ncludes'
EMC Section
from two attached garages
(732 SF and 440 SF) with a
401-SF garage which is code
compliant.
30.48.040A1 states that
total area of 1,172 SF that
an attached garage shall
were permitted with the
not exceed 1,000
existing residence under the
square feet or 50
County of San Diego, The
total area exceeds the
Am=
ITEM NAME: BRUBAKER FAgADE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NUMBER: ULTI- 003331 ®2019, A agCD 33 ®a1 , CDPNF -00 334 -201
.�_
. .w=. ..�......m
m i bm allowed area of
,...... „.
1, 000 SF.
..W.�ecti._
EMC
attached
..
cause 1912 Cambridge
includes ...... � .
�,Venl�e
30.48.0 0A3 states that
garagestawouldarequire
p..401
a code compliant SF
an attached garage may
permit. The lack of a use
garage, this code section does not
be permitted with
permit renders the total area of
apply.
additional area by
attached garages to be legal
issuance of a minor use
nonconforming.
permit4
Rear -Yard Setback from
A portion of the existing
The existing rear-yard setback
Alley w 20 feet
residence is four feet® three
complies with the required rear-
inches from the rear alley
yard setback.
property line. Since the
residence was permitted by
e County of San Diego, the
setback encroachment is
rendered legal nonconforming,
Setback from Staaftord
.���� �
� of the existing
g
This does
This unit does not have frontage �
residence � two feet -11 inches
s
with Stafford Avenue therefore,
Avenue — 10 feet
from the exterior Stafford
this exterior setback standard does ;
Avenue property line. Since
not apply.
the residence was permitted
by the County of San Grego,
the setback encroachment is
rendered legal nonconforming.
� ..
Lot ove (Net Lot
tl m
Area) 40
.. . „
The maxi mum lot coverage is
40
�. . �
The maximum lot coverage is 40
percent
percent. The existing
percent, The residence benefits
residence straddles Lots 1 and
from a lot coverage of 50 percent
2•
that exceeds the standard. Since ,.
the residence was permitted by the
The portion of the residence
County of San Diego, the lot
on Lot 1 has a lot coverage of
coverage is rendered legal
approximately 52 percent,
nonconforming.
The portion of the residence
on Lot 2 is approximately 37 "
percent.
Since the residence was
permitted by the County of
San Diego, the lot coverage
for Lot 1 is rendered legal
nonconforming. The lot
coverage for Lot 2 is code
I
compliant.
n
Reduced FYSB — Because the lot addressed as 1912 Cambridge Avenue is a substandard
lot and an alley abuts the rear of the lot, EMC Section 30, 16.01 OD1 0 allows a reduced front
yard setback provided that parking is in the rear of the lot off the alley stating —
AgU —Access - Both garages are oriented for access from the alley consistent with
30A630101311b(3) (Residential Zones) where access is required from the alley to the
extent practical.
ITEM NAME: BRUBAKER FA(ADE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT
NUMBER: MULTI-003331-2019, AC)R-003332-2019, CDPNF-003334-201 9
. .............
Floor Area Ratio (Gross
........... ...... --
Them aximum FAR is 0.5 for a
. ..... .......... ........... - - ----------
The maximum FAR is 0.5 for a
Lot Area) — 0,5
substandard lot. The existing
substandard lot. The residence
(Substandard Lot)
residence straddles Lots 1 and
benefits from an FAR of 0.76 that
2°
exceeds the standard. Since the
residence was permitted by the
The portion of the residence
County of San Diego, the FAR is
on Lot 1 has an FAR of
rendered legal nonconforming,
approximately 0,56. The
portion of the residence on Lot
2 has an FAR of approximately
0,60
Since the residence was
permitted by the County of
San Diego, the FAR for both
Lots 1 and 2 are rendered
legal nonconforming.
.......... ...........
Building Height —
.. . ................. . ................
As described above in the
.......... . .............
As described above in the
EMC Section
Municipal Code analysis
section, the residence at 365
Municipal Code analysis section,
the residence at 1912 Cambridge
30.16.010 B6 requires a
Stafford Avenue exceeds the
Avenue exceeds the maximum
maximum of two stories
maximum residential height
residential height limit. Because
and 22 feet to the top of
limit and includes three stories
the residence was permitted by the
a flat roof (or in the case
as demonstrated in the project
County of San Diego, the building
of a pitched roof to the
plans. Because the residence
height is rendered legal
top of the roof
was permitted by the County
nonconforming,
immediately above the
of San Diego, the building
exterior plane of the wall
height and its three stories are
below, including roofing
rendered legal nonconforming,
material), and 2 feet for
a pitched roof.
---- . .................. ....................
.. ......... . .................. . . ............... . . . ................. 1.----- . .................
Development Standards Discussion
.. . ................... . . ---- . .............. . ... ---- . . ............... . ...............
Reduced FYSB — Because the lot addressed as 1912 Cambridge Avenue is a substandard
lot and an alley abuts the rear of the lot, EMC Section 30, 16.01 OD1 0 allows a reduced front
yard setback provided that parking is in the rear of the lot off the alley stating —
AgU —Access - Both garages are oriented for access from the alley consistent with
30A630101311b(3) (Residential Zones) where access is required from the alley to the
extent practical.
ITEM NAME: BRUBAKER FAQADE IMPROVEMENTE
.*ROJECT NUMBER: MULTI-003331-2019, ADR-003332-2012–QA,,aL]E-affil,34-P
The proposed project is subject to Design Review and is required to demonstrate compliance
with the City of Encinitas Design Guidelines pursuant to EIVIC 23.08 (Design Review). The City
#4 Encinitas Design Guidelines provides guidance for the architectural design of residentia-T
ievelopments. A summary of the twinhome design, color and materials are as follows:
The project is consistent with the applicable Design Guidelines as summarized below:
siste- ---------------
Design Guideline Conncy
E i o�ofi*r o_jeci --- do ---- nif_orma --- n --- c --- e --- — - -----------
X71�jl� �t
. .........
5 4 n
Section ,5 ®a BuiI!;kq_g
Design Guideline 5.3.3 - Building forms
Almost all homes within the near vicinity are two
should be designed to create visual interest.
stories and split level following the downward
Changes in form accomplished by varying
topography from east to west. The proposed
levels and planes can create a visually
twinhume maintains this design feature and
interesting structure while minimizing the
incorporates recesses and projections in the wall
appearance of bulk.
planes to create offset front yard setbacks. The
rear yard setback is used to break up the
otherwise uniform fagade typically seen along
alleyways, Further, the twinhome incorporates
decks, changes in color and offsets to create
shadows and perspective, to further minimize
the bulk and scale of the homes and break up
the massing of the homes into smaller parts.
The different rooffines and roof styles provide
variety in the building form and outline, creating
visual interest in differing the bulk and mass as it
steps down the topography from east to west.
This stepped appearance in design combined
with the detached appearance separated at the
front with a zero-lot line towards the rear of the
home, and varied exterior siding materials would
reflect a compatible style that would not
dominate the neighborhood, but would fit
– ------------------ — ------------- - — ---------- — ------------
comfortably into the project area.
--------- _ -------------- — -------- ___ ----------- _ ------------
f
art... Guideline
project 11.... „
te
architectural nature of Encinitas should be
architectural design that is complementary to the
re te-
reflected in any project.
n an
site and neighborhood.
e gn .4.2- Large or unbroken
VMFIales gn Ot-the twin ome inc udes articulation
wall planes should be avoided. Building
on all four-sides of the buildings. Architectural
masses should be broken into smaller-scale
elements entail a pitched roofline, roof
elements order shadows
visual 11 should be articulated
quality _' treatments different w 4
with .a overhangs, porches,
II contrast. Large glass
architectural projections and recesses,
incorporated throughout the design.
varied rooflines, varied materials and color,
second story setbacks, courts and projected
windows.
creating visual I
�� # • •" •
interest in reducing the bulk and mass. The
provides roofing material and color e and
contributes to the overall architectural interest of
• - s
the proposed twinhome.
w- •
WA
�,.
w � � � •I � nX �' * � w � r ' � M w
i I
s �
wI M, l y
� y
#1N
9MATIM
The project has been determined to be exempt from environmental review pursuant to California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15301(a), which exempts interior and
exterior alterations to private structures. The project meets the criteria of the exemption. None
*f the exceptions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 exists and no historic resources would
be impacted by the proposed project.
11 of ,17
Ep=* ,
The applicant is proposing an exterior renovation to an existing twinhome. The project is
consistent with all R-1 1 zone development regulations and would not increase the area, building
height, or change the building footprint. Public improvements and utility services are available
to serve the site,
The project is consistent with all applicable policies of the General Plan and Local Coastal
Program, and provisions of the Municipal Code. The proposed project is in conformance with
EIVIC Chapters 30.16 (Residential Zones), 30.76 (Nonconformities), and 30.80 (Coastal
Development Permit). The project would be required to comply with all applicable Building and
Fire codes through the standard building permit plan checking process.
MW
Based on the findings for a Design Review Permit as per Encinitas Municipal Code
Section 23.08 .080 (Design Review) and the aforementioned analysis, the Development
Services Department has made the following findings to support the approval, with
conditioins:
ITEM NAME: BRUBAKER FAqADE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NUMBER: MULTI-003331-201 9, AOR403332-2019, CDPNF-o03334-2019
«<.a,» «an is proposing a fagade renovation for an existing twinhome, All of the R-1 1 zone
development standards and legal nonconformities would be maintained, The Development
Services Department has determined the Administrative Design Review Permit and Coastal
Development Permit application to §- consistent with all applicable policies of the General Plan,
Local Coastal Program, and provisions of the Municipal Code. Therefore, the project is
ffi�
approved based upon the aforementioned findings and subject to the following conditions of
approval,
SC1 SPECIF19 CONDITIONS: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SCB The following conditions shall be completed/fulfilled to the satisfaction of the
Development Services Department:
1 A Planning Final Inspection shall be required prior to final occupancy.
2. As documented on the project plans for 365 Stafford Avenue, the existing
46crawlspace" as part of the existing ground level and first floor plan (Sheet A-1.1)
shall remain unfinished with no floor installation and shall not be enlarged or altered
in any way without prior City approval.
SCC The following conditions shall be completed and/or fulfilled to the satisfaction of the San
Diegulto Water District (SDWD):
The subject property is currently being served by a 3/4-inch water meter
dedicated to 365 Stafford Avenue and a 3/4-inch water meter dedicated to 1912
Cambridge Avenue. If the water meter(s) need to be upsized for the proposed
use, the Developer shall upgrade the meter(s) and/or water service(s) at his
expense,
2. The developer shall install the water system according to Water Agencies' (WAS)
standards.
li]IMIlII[Ili5l
(31
ITEM NAME: BRUBAKER FAqADE IMPROVEMENTs
PROJECT NUMBER: MULTI-003331-2019, ADR-003332-2019, COPNF-003334-2019
CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S):
G4 Prior to building permit issuance, the owner shall cause a covenant regarding real
property to be recorded. Said covenant shall set forth the terms and conditions of this
grant of approval and shall be of a form and content satisfactory to the Developmen)
Services Director.
claims of liability against the City and indemnify, hold
and City's employees regarding any component of the
I an indemnity agreement in substantially the form as
Zervices Department prior to building permit issuance
Director, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute
G6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Municipal
Code and all other applicable City regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit
issuance unless specifically waived herein.
G11 All retaining and other freestanding walls, fences, and enclosures shall be architecturally
designed in a manner similar to, and consistent with, the primary structures (e.g. stucco-
coated masonry, split-face block or slump stone). These items shall be approved by the
Development Services Department prior to the issuance of building and/or grading
permits.
ITEm NAME: BRUBAKER FACADE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NUMBER: MULTI-003331-2019, ADR-003332-2019, CDPNF-003334-2019
landscaping, berm, • combination thereof to the satisfaction of the Development
Services Department. All exterior accessory structures shall be designed to be
compatible with the primary building's exterior to the satisfaction of the Development
Services Department.
G13 Prior to any use of the project site pursuant to this permit, all conditions of approval
contained herein shall be completed y to the satisfaction of the Development
Services Department.
DR 1 Any future modifications to the approved project will be reviewed relative to the findinV-
for substantial conformance with a design review permit contained in Section 23,08.140
of the Municipal Code, Modifications beyond the scope described therein may require
submittal of an amendment to the design review permit and approval by the authorized
agency.
DR2 Side and rear elevations and window treatments shall be trimmed and architecturally
treated so as to substantially match the front elevations. This treatment shall be
reflected in building plans and shall be found satisfactory by the Development Services
Department prior to the issuance of building permits.
DR3 All project grading shall conform with the approved plans, If no grading is proposed on
the approved plans, or subsequent grading plans are inconsistent with the grading
shown on the approved plans, a design review permit for such grading shall be obtained
from the authorized agency of the City prior to issuance of grading or building permits.
ITEM NAME: BRUBAKER FAQADE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NUMBER: MULTI-003331-2019, ADR-003332-2019, CDPNF-003334-2019
This notice constitutes a decision of the Development Services Department only for the
discretionary entitlement. Additional permits, such as Building and Grading Permits, may be
required by the Development Services Department or other City Departments. It is the property
ownK r and applicant's responsibility to obtain all necessary permits required for the type of
project proposed,,