2017-12 (EG)RESOLUTION NO. PC 2017 -12
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING LOT INTO TWO RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND
GRADING ENCROACHMENTS INTO STEEP SLOPES FOR AN EMERGENCY
TURNAROUND ACCESS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1022 SIDONIA STREET
(CASE NO. 15 -271 TPM /DR/CDP; APN 256- 232 -24)
WHEREAS, Coastal Land Solutions submitted an application for a Tentative Parcel
Map, Design Review Permit, and Coastal Development to subdivide an existing 1.012 -acre
property into two residential lots and grading improvements and encroachments into steep
slopes for the property located at 1022 Sidonia Street, legally described in Exhibit A;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearing on April
20, 2017;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Encinitas Planning Commission
hereby APPROVES Case No. 15 -271 TPM /DR/CDP based on the following Environmental
Determination and Findings:
Section 1. California Environmental Quality Act Determination
The project has been determined to be exempt from environmental review pursuant to
Sections 15315 and 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines. Section 15315 exempts minor land divisions when the subdivision of
property involves four or fewer parcels located in urbanized areas zoned for residential,
commercial, or industrial use; when the subdivision is in conformance with the General
Plan and zoning; no variances or exceptions are required; all services and access to the
proposed parcels to local standards are available; the parcel was not involved in a
division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years; and the parcel does not have an
average slope greater than 20 percent. Section 15332 exempts in -fill development
projects under certain conditions. This categorical exemption allows for projects that are
characterized as in -fill development, and meet certain conditions, to be exempt from
further environmental review. The proposed subdivision of an existing in -fill lot meets the
criteria for these exemptions. The project does not qualify as one of the exceptions
prescribed under Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines and no historic resources are
affected by the proposed project.
Page 1 of 13
Section 2. Discretionary Action(s) Findings
IMP► I 7P![* -]
Based on the findings for a Tentative Parcel Map as per Section 66474 of the California
Government Code and the aforementioned analysis, the Planning Commission has made
the following findings to support the approval, with conditions:
Findings for Tentative Map
Explanation of Finding
That the proposed map is not consistent
The proposed subdivision is consistent with the
with applicable general and specific
General Plan. The project site is not located within
plans as specified in Section 65451 of
a specific plan and meets the applicable R3 zoning
the Subdivision Map Act.
standards for the minimum net lot area, minimum lot
width, minimum lot depth and allowable density.
That the design or improvement of the
As conditioned, the project design and
proposed subdivision is not consistent
improvements are consistent with the General Plan.
with applicable general and specific
plans.
That the site is not physically suitable for
The project site is physically suitable for the
the proposed type of development.
proposed type of development. The project
proposes to subdivide one existing lot into two lots.
The proposed grading and project design is
consistent with the existing topography of the site.
The proposed subdivision is consistent with the R3
zoning standards for minimum lot area, minimum lot
depth and minimum lot width. Additionally, all
necessary public facilities and services are in place,
or can be extended, to serve the project.
That the site is not physically suitable for
The applicant proposes to subdivide one existing lot
the proposed density of development.
into two new legal parcels. The R3 zoning
designation allows for a maximum density of 3.0
dwelling units per net acre. The subdivision of the
subject property would create two legal lots
consistent with the allowable density for the R3
zone. Additionally, the two new lots would meet the
minimum net lot size requirements and the minimum
lot dimension requirements for the R3 zone.
That the design of the subdivision or the
The proposed subdivision is located in an urbanized
proposed improvements are likely to
area and is surrounded by substantially developed
cause substantial environmental damage
properties. The project would not cause substantial
or substantially or avoidably injure fish or
environmental damage or substantially or avoidably
wildlife or their habitat.
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project has
been determined to be exempt from further
environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Sections 15315 and 15332.
Page 2 of 13
Findings for Tentative Map
Explanation of Finding
That the design of the subdivision or the
All necessary public facilities and services are in
type of improvements is likely to cause
place, or can be extended, to serve the project. The
serious public health problems.
applicant has submitted letters of facility availability
b. The project design is substantially
from fire, sewer, water and school service providers
inconsistent with the Design Review
indicating that existing facilities are available to
Guidelines
service the proposed project. The design of the
subdivision would not result in serious public health
problems. The project is exempt from environmental
review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections
15315 and 15332.
That the design of the subdivision or the
All easements of record identified in the preliminary
type of improvements will conflict with
title report for the subject property are shown on the
easements, acquired by the public at
proposed tentative parcel map. No conflicts with
large, for access through or use of,
easements of record have been identified.
property within the proposed subdivision.
In this connection, the authorized agency
may approve a map if it finds that
alternate easements, for access or for
use, will be provided, and that these will
be substantially equivalent to ones
previously acquired by the public. This
subsection shall apply only to easements
of record or to easements established by
judgment of a court of competent
jurisdiction and no authority is hereby
granted to a legislative body to determine
that the public at large has acquired
easements through or use of property
within the proposed subdivision.
Based on the findings for a Design Review Permit as per Encinitas Municipal Code
Section 23.08.080 (Design Review) and the aforementioned analysis, the Planning
Commission has made the following findings to support the approval, with conditions:
Finding for Design Review
Explanation of Finding
a. The project design is inconsistent
The proposed grading design is consistent with the
with the General Plan, a Specific
applicable policies of the General Plan and
Plan or the provisions of this Code.
applicable sections of the Municipal Code.
b. The project design is substantially
The grading being proposed for the hammerhead
inconsistent with the Design Review
turnaround is consistent with the topography of the
Guidelines
site and is substantially consistent with the Design
Guideline recommendations. The grading for the
proposed hammerhead would be minimal as it
would be located at the bottom of the slope without
detracting from the topography of the site. The
Page 3 of 13
Finding for Design Review
Explanation of Finding
1. The project is consistent with the certified
grading would not be seen from the public view
Local Coastal Program of the City of
since it would be below the existing single - family
Encinitas; and
home and would be well beyond the 125 -foot long
panhandle from the public view of Passiflora Place.
No other grading is proposed.
c. The project would adversely affect
The proposed subdivision is compatible with the
the health, safety, or general welfare
immediately surrounding uses. No evidence has
of the community.
been submitted or discovered that would suggest
2. The proposed development conforms
that the proposed project would adversely affect the
with Public Resources Code Section
health, safety, or general welfare of the surrounding
21000 and following (CEQA) in that there
uses, residences or structures. The project is
are no feasible mitigation measures or
exempt from the requirements of CEQA Sections
feasible alternatives available which
15315 and 15332 and no adverse impacts to the
would substantially lessen any significant
environment are anticipated.
d. The project would tend to cause the
The design of the proposed subdivision is
surrounding neighborhood to
compatible with the surrounding structures and
depreciate materially in appearance
uses. No evidence has been identified or received
or value.
that would suggest that the proposed project would
cause the surrounding neighborhood to depreciate
materially in appearance or value.
Based on the findings for a Coastal Development Permit as per Encinitas Municipal Code
Section 30.80.090 and the aforementioned analysis, the Planning Commission has made
the following findings to support the approval, with conditions:
Finding for a Coastal Development Permit
Explanation of Finding
1. The project is consistent with the certified
The proposed subdivision and grading complies
Local Coastal Program of the City of
with all applicable development standards of the
Encinitas; and
R3 Zone related to minimum net lot area,
minimum lot depth, minimum lot width and
density. The project is consistent with policies of
the City's certified Local Coastal Program
including the General Plan and the Municipal
Code.
2. The proposed development conforms
No potentially significant adverse impacts to the
with Public Resources Code Section
environment would result from the project and
21000 and following (CEQA) in that there
the project is exempt from environmental review.
are no feasible mitigation measures or
feasible alternatives available which
would substantially lessen any significant
adverse impact that the activity may
have on the environment; and
Page 4 of 13
Finding for a Coastal Development Permit
Explanation of Finding
3. For projects involving development
The project site is located on Sidonia Street and
between the sea or other body of water
Passiflora Place, which are not located between
and the nearest public road, approval
the sea and the nearest public road. Therefore,
shall include a specific finding that such
Section 30200 et. seq. of the Coastal Act does
development is in conformity with the
not apply.
public access and public recreation
policies of Section 30200 et. seq. of the
Coastal Act.
The above environmental determination and findings are supported by the minutes, nlapG. and
exhibits, all of which are herein incorporated by reference.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that based on the Environmental Determination and
Findings hen9inb8f0r8 adopted by the Planning Commission, Case No. 15-271 TPNK[]R/C[}Fz is
hereby subject b} the conditions in Exhibit B.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of April, 2017, by the following vote, to wit:
�"41.1
NOTE: This action is subject to Chapter 1.04 Of the Municipal Code, which specifies time |irnh3
for legal challenges.
Page scd13
EXHIBIT "A"
Resolution No. F»C 2017-12
Case No. 15-271 TPM/DR/CDP
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW |GGTU/TEO|N THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND |SDESCR|BEOASFOLLOWS:
That portion of Lot 28 ofPaaoiflonaAcres, in the City ofEncinitas, County ofSan Diego, State of
California, according to Map thereof No. 2355, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San
Diego County, described @Gfollows:
Beginning at a point in the Easterly line of said L0t, distant along said Easterly line, 225.00 feet
Southerly from the Northeasterly corner ofsaid lot; thence Northerly along said Easterly line
100.00 feet; thence Westerly pon]||e| with the Northerly line of said Lot. 303.25 feet to point in
line which is parallel with and 20.00 feet Easterly from the Westerly Lot line, said 20.00 feet
being [O8@GunBd along the Northerly line Of said Lot; thence Northerly along said p8[@||e|
line, 25.48 feet 0J said Northerly line; thence Westerly along said Northerly line 20.00 feet to the
Northwesterly corner Of said Lot; thence Southerly along said Westerly Lot line, 247.00 fee[;
thence Easterly in 8 direct line 369.00 feet, more or |H8G, to the point of beginning
Page 6nf13
EXHIBIT "B"
ResoUutionNo- PC 2017-12
Case No. 15-271 TPM/DR/CDP
Applicant: Coastal Land Solutions for Ashley Sob8Ck and Scott Glenn
Location: 1O22Gidnnia Street A\PN250-233-24\
SC1 SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
8[�4 Approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and all associated permits will expire on Anh| 20.
2019. at 5 p.0.. two years after the approval of this project, unless the conditions have
been met or an extension of time has been approved pursuant to the Municipal Code.
SC5 This project is conditionally approved as set forth on the application and project drawings
stamped received by the City On Aoh| 5. 2017. consisting of five sheets including
Tentative Parcel M@p, Slope Analysis, Preliminary Grading Plan (Parcel 1. Parcel 2' and
8eCtiDO8\, all designated aaapproved by the Planning Commission on April 2O. 2017,
and shall not be altered without express authorization by the Planning & Building
Department.
SCA The following COOditiODS shall be completed/fulfilled t0 the G8USfaCtiOA of the P|8ODiOg
and Building Department:
1. Prior to [8CO[d8UOD of the Parcel Map, the applicant shall submit for 8 building pH[Dlh
0D construct new detached garage on P@rCR| 1, receive building permit approval,
construct the garage, and receive certificate of final occupancy.
2. Prior 8] recordation Of the P8[C8| K8ap, pU[GU8O{ to Chapter 30.343.030
(Hillside/inland Bluff Overlay), the applicant shall execute and n8conJ an easement
placing all steep slopes of 25% gradient or more in a slope preservation easement to
the satisfaction of the Planning and Building Department. Said easement shall
prohibit grading or p|@D8rD8nt Of any structure within said steep slope 8F88a unless
authorized by the City OfEncinitas.
SCB The following conditions shall b8completed/fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Engineering
OkviSk]D:
1. Prior to recordation of the P8[C8l K88p. the existing 0VS[he3d Uti|hv service |iDBG
including C8hl8' telephone, and electric running to the RXiSUDg [8Gid8DC8 Sh8U be
n3Dl0Ned and FeiDSt8||8d UOd8n]nDuOd. Any future utility service lines to any new
St[UCtU[8S OD either lot shall also be installed uOd8n]nDUOd.
2. The OvvOe[ shall dedicate additional i OD the P8[Ce| K48p 8k}Dg the
property frontage to Passiflora Place to ensure a property line to mad centerline
distance of 18 feet as shown on Map 2355 and on the TPM.
Page 7nf13
3. PhO[ to the recordation of 8 P8rC8| M8p, the applicant Gh3U be responsible for the
construction of public improvements along the property frontage to Sid0Di8 Street.
Damaged pavement sections oho|| be repaired and entire frontage overlaid. Private
street parking shall be required at u ratio of one space per every parcel. Pona||e|
parking spaces shall be eight-feet wide by 25-feet-long or 21-feet-long each for
tandem parking. Since there are two parcels propoaad, a minimum of two on-street
parking 8p@C8S Sh8|| be provided. Directly adjacent to the asphalt concrete (AC)
pavement of the street for the remainder Ufthe frontage, 8 36-inch-wide permeable
pam3rsxv3|a shall be constructed 0D convey the street drainage. The pow3nS Sh8|| be
surrounded on all sides by a six-inch wide by 16-inch deep Portland cement concrete
/PCC\ flush curb. The PCC flush curb and first 12-inches of the permeable pavers
shall be sloped at0to one percent Uz the flow |ine, and then rise at no more than
eight percent slope to the back of the pervious pavers.
4. Prior to recordation of the P8[CH| M8p, the owner shall execute and r8:OPd a
Permanent Encroachment K4Gint8ngnC8 and Removal Covenant to ensure the
Dl8|DteD8DCe of the pervious pavers and i[DpO]w8OleOtS in the right-of-way in
perpetuity.
5. Prior to n3CondabOO of the Parcel Mop, the owner shall execute and record @
covenant on the property holding the City harmless for drainage.
0. A five-foot wide Public Pedestrian Access, Drainage, and (]enen8| Utility Easement
shall be granted to the City on the Parcel Map along SidOnia Street.
7. The existing clogged steel drainage pipe crossing the driveway atGidoni8 Street
shall be demolished and all drainage shall remain at the surface.
8. Fo[iO[ to FeCDPd81i0D of the P8nC8| Map, all existing dry and VV8t UU|iti8S including
electric, cable, telephone, water, sewer, and gas shall be relocated within the bounds
of the proposed utility easement.
S. All retaining VV8||8 that are built OO property lines Gh8|| be built to withstand a
SUnCh@rg0 pe[Q[]R8D C-2' C-4' or C-6 so as to not preclude future use on 8di8CeOt
properties.
10. There is an existing SOGE easement that traverses Parcel 2. This easement shall
be quitclaimed and the corresponding Uti|iU8S n8|0C8t8d prior to iSGU8DCU Of U
building permit for 8 fUtUn8 home OD P8[C8| 2.
8CD The fO||OVYiDg COOditiODS Sh8|| be completed/fulfilled to the satisfaction Of the 88D
[}i8gUitO Water District (8[)VVC)\:
1. The developer Sh8|| install the water system GCCOndiDg t0 VV8t8[ AO8Od8S' /VVAS\
standards, and Sh3|| dedicate to SDVVO the portion Of the water system which is to
be public.
2. Water 0gt8nS Sh8|| be |OC8t8d in h0Dt of the parcel they are serving and outside of
any existing O[ proposed travel way. The developer shall pay the cost 0frelocation.
Page aof13
RE
3. The developer will be required to ShOVV all existing and proposed water facilities OD
improvement or grading plans for District Approval.
CONTACT THE PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S):
G4 Prior to building of the final parcel map, the owner ah8U
cause a covenant regarding real property to be recorded. Said covenant shall set forth the
terms and conditions of this grant of approval and shall be of 8 form and content
satisfactory to the Planning & Building Director.
G5 The shall xV8kxe any d8hmS of liability against the City and iDd8DlOif/ hold
harmless and defend the City and City's employees regarding any component of the City's
approval, by executing an indemnity agreement in substantially the form as provided by the
Planning and Building Department.
G0 Aoo[Ov8| of this request Sh8U not vv8iwe CD[Dp|i8DDe with any sections of the Municipal
Code and all other applicable City regulations in effect otthe time of Building Permit
issuance unless specifically waived herein.
G11 All retaining and other freestanding VVaUO. f8OC8S. and eDC|0SU[8S Sh8U be 8FChit8CtUn8Uy
designed in 8 manner similar to, and consistent with, the primary structures /8.g. SiUCCO-
CO@t8d masonry, split-face block orslump stone). These items shall be approved by the
Planning & Building Dep8dOO8Ot prior to the iSSU8OC8 Of building and/or grading permits.
G13 Prior to any use of the project site pursuant to this permit, all CODditi0OG of approval
contained herein 8h8U be completed or secured to the satisfaction of the Planning &
Building Department.
G14 The applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may
iOC|Ud8. but not be limited to: Permit and Pk3D Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service
FH8S, SChOO| FSeS, Traffic Mitigation F8eS, Flood Control Mitigation Feea, Park
Mitigation Fees, and Fire W1iUQ@UoO/COSt Recovery Fees. Arrangements to pay these
fees shall be made prior to Final Map approval to the satisfaction of the Planning &
Building and Engineering Services Departments. The applicant iS advised to contact the
Planning & Building O8p8rt08Ot regarding Park Mitigation Fees, the Engineering
Services Department regarding Flood Control and Traffic Fees, applicable School
District(s) regarding School Fees, the Fire Department regarding Fine Mitigation/Cost
Recovery Fees, and the applicable Utility Departments or Districts regarding VV808r
and/or Sewer Fees.
G14 A plan shall be submitted for approval by the Planning & Building Department, the
Engineering Services Departnlant, and the Fln* Department regarding the saouhb/
tnB8tOOeOt of the site during the DnDEtnJ[tiOO ph8S8' the on- and off-site CirCu|8iiOD and
parking Of COOSt[UCUOO VVO[k8[S' wghiC|eG. and any heavy equipment needed for the
construction Ofthe project.
Page Rof13
G20 Garages enclosing required parking spaces shall be kept available and usable for the
parking of 0VVDe[/t8O8Dt V8hiC|8S at all UOleS' and may not be rented or conveyed
separately from the appurtenant dwelling unit.
G24 Any vxoU, fence or combination thereof exceeding six feet in height and facing any
neighboring property Or visible from the public rig Gh8U be subject to design
review pU[SU8Dt 0D Section 23.08.040.A.1 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. VVh8PS 8
nOiDiDlU0O two feet hOhzDOt8| offset is provided, within which SC[88DiOg vegetation is
provided LO the s8bGf@CiiOO of the P|8DDiOg & Building []8p8[t[n8Dt, the fgDCG/w@|| may
not be considered one continuous structure for purpose of measuring height and may b8
exempted from design review provided none of the offset fences or walls exceed six feet
in height pursuant to Section 23.O8.O38.B.1.
DESIGN REVIEW
DF(1 Any future modifications to the approved project will be reviewed relative 0J the findings
for substantial CODfOrm8Ocg with 8 design review permit contained in 88CUOD 23.08.140
of the Municipal Code. Modifications beyond the scope described therein may require
GUb[Oitt@| of an amendment to the design review permit and approval by the authorized
agency.
DR3 All project grading Sh8|| COOhJ[Dl with the 8ppnOV8d p|gOS. If no grading is pnOpVS8d OD
the approved p|8na, or subsequent grading plans are inconsistent with the grading
shown oD the approved plans, 8 design review permit for such grading shall b8obtained
from the authorized agency of the City prior to issuance of grading or building permits.
TENTATIVE MAPSIPARCEL MAPS
M1 This approval may b8 appealed tO the City Council within 10 calendar days from the date
Of this approval pursuant tO Chapter 1.12Of the Municipal Code.
K44 The property owner/developer shall obtain design review permits UlnDUQh the City for
homes to be constructed on the lots resulting from the approved 0O8p' as well as all
related site improvements. If the property owner/developer elects to develop the lots
n3sU|bDg from the approved final rD8p as custom hornenit8S. the design review permit
requirement may be waived by the Planning & Building Department pursuant to Section
23.00.030 (7) Of the Municipal Code. The pn3p8dv OVvO8r/deV8|Oper is advised 1O
contact the Planning & Building Department at such time ao development of the subject
property i3 p|8OO8d to determine whether 3 design [8Vi8Vv permit will be required. A
standard covenant specifying this condition shall be recorded in the Office of the County
Recorder iO give constructive notice tO future purchasers 0f the site.
F1 FIRE CONDITIONS:
CONTACT THE ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITION(S):
F2 ACCESS ROAD 80UNIMKJ8D DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus access roads shall have an
unobstructed improved width of not |8SS than 24 feet; curb line to CUd3 line, and an
Single-
Page 1ou[13
FoDlik/ residential driveways; G8n/Og OO more than two single-family dVVeUiDgS, shall
have DliOiOlUDl Of 16 feet, CU[b line to cVdJ line, of unobstructed iDlpPDV8d width. ACCe3S
roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of not |eoe than
75.000 pounds and ohoU be provided with an approved paved surface to provide all-
weather driving capabilities.
F5 GRADE: The gradient for ofin* apparatus aCCaSe roadway Gh2U not exceed 20.096.
Grades exceeding 15.0% (incline or decline) Sh8U not be permitted without mitigation.
Minimal mitigation ahoU be o surface of Portland cement concrete, with a deep broom
finish perpendicular to the 8OUF8 direction of travel. Additional nliUg8tiOO nDe8Sur88 may
be required where deemed appropriate. The angle of departure and angle Vfapproach
ofa fire access roadway shall not exceed seven degrees (12p8roent).
E1 ENGINEERING CONDITIONS:
CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWINGCKDN0Ul0{0N(S):
E2 All City COdgG. [8gU|8hOnS. and pO|iCi8S in effect at the time Ofbui|diOg/o[8diDg permit
issuance shall apply.
E3 All drawings submitted for Engineering permits are required to reference the NAV[> 88
datum; the NGVD2S datum will not beaccepted.
EG1 Grading Conditions
EG3 The developer shall obtain 8 grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing
or grading of the site.
EG4 The grading for this project is defined in Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code.
Grading Sh2U be performed under the observation of a civil engineer vvhVG8
responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to ensure compliance of
the VVO[k with the approved grading p|3D' submit required reports to the Engineering
Services Director and verify C0OOp|i8DCS with Chapter 23.24 Of the Encinitas K8UDiCip8|
Code.
EG5 No grading ahoU occur outside the limits of the project unless G letter Of permission is
obtained from the owners of the affected properties.
EG0 Separate grading plans shall be submitted and approved and separate grading permits
iSSU8d for borrow Ordisposal sites if located within the City limits.
EG7 All newly created slopes within this project shall b8 no steeper than 2:1.
E{38 A SOi|S/g8O|OgiC8|/hVdF8U|iC F8pO[t (8G 8pp|iC@b|8) Sh8|/ be prepared by 8 qualified
engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. The report shall be
submitted with the first grading p|gD SVbOlitt8| and Sh8|| be approved prior to iSSU8OCe Of
any grading permit for the project.
EG9 Prior to hauling dirt O[construction Dl8t8[i8|S to any pnOpOS8d CODGtrU[tiOD site within this
project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the Engineering Services
Page 11of13
Director for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and
requirements the Engineering Services Director may impose with regards to the hauling
operation.
EG10 In accordance with Section 23.24.370 (A) of the Municipal Code, no grading permit aheU
be issued for work 000uninQ between October 1st of any year and Aoh| 15th of the
following year, unless the p|gOa for such work include details of protective maaauree,
including desi|ting basins or other temporary dF8iO8g8 Or control meaGUF8S' Or both. as
may be deemed necessary by the field inspector to protect the adjoining public and
private property from d802gB by erOSion. Oooding, or the deposition of mud or debris
which may originate from the site or result from such grading operations.
ED1 Drainage Conditions
E[>3/\ An BnJGiOn control system shall be designed and installed onsite during all construction
activity. The system shall pnawani discharge of sediment and all other pollutants onto
adjacent streets and into the storm drain system. The City of Encinitas Best
Management Practice Manual aho|| be employed 0J determine appropriate storm water
pollution control practices during construction.
ED5 The owner shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior tO issuance of the building
permit for this project or Gh@|| COOSt[u[t drainage systems in conformance with the
yWaehSr Drainage Plan and City ofEncinitas Standards as required by the Engineering
Services Director.
ED8 The owner ofthe auhieoi property shall execute 8 hold harmless covenant regarding
drainage across the adjacent property prior to oppnDv@| of the any grading or building
permit for this project.
ES1 Street Conditions
E85 Prior to any work being p8do[nl8d in the public right-of-way, 8 right-of-way CODSt[UCtiQO
permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Director and appropriate fees
paid, in addition to any other permits required.
E83 The 0vvne[ Gh8U OO8h8 GD offer of dedication 0D the City for all public streets and
e@G808DtS required by these conditions or shown OO the site development plan. The
offer shall be made by execution of grant deed prior to isGU@OC8 of any building permit
for this project. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear ofall liens
and encumbrances and without cost tothe City. Streets that are already public are not
required toberededicated.
EU1 Utilities Conditions
EU2 The owner shall comply with all the rukas, regukationa, and design requirements of the
respective utility agencies regarding services to the project.
EU3 The owner shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G. & E.. AT&T, and other
applicable authorities.
EU4 All proposed utilities within the project shall b8 installed UDdeFgFOUDd including existing
utilities unless exempt bythe Municipal Code.
Page 12nf13
EU4A The existing overhead utilities service k} the property shall beunderQnounded.
ESW1 Storm Water Pollution Control Conditions
ES\8/5 The project OlUSt OO88t storm VV8t8[ qU8|hv and pollution CDOtrO| [eqUirODl8DtS. The
applicant shall design and construct landscape and/or turf areas and ensure that all
flows from impervious surfaces are directed across these areas prior to discharging onto
the otnaeL A Grading Plan identifying all landscape areas designed for storm water
pollution control /GVVPC\ond Best Management Practice shall be submitted to the Qty
for Engineering Services Department approval. A note shall be placed on the plans
indicating that the modification or n8DlOV3| of the SVVPC facilities without 8 permit from
the City iSprohibited.
EGVV9 For etOnn xv8te[ pollution control purpoaee, all runoff from all roof drains shall discharge
onto grass and landscape areas prior to mJUacUon and discharge onto the street and/or
into the public storm drain 8vatenn. Grass and landscape areas designated for storm
VVGtS[ pO||UtiOO CODtFO| Sh8|| not be modified without 8 permit from the City. A note t0 this
effect shall be p|8C8d on the Grading plan.
Page 1auf13