2004-102
City of Encinitas
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
505 So. Vulcan Ave.
Encinitas, CA 92024
(760) 633-2710
NOTICE OF DECISION
PBD 2004-102
October 12, 2004
This letter is to inform you that the Planning and Building Director has approved your application
for:
04-122 TPM/CDP (paulsen) - A Tentative Parcel Map and Coastal Development Permit
to subdivide an existing 0.691-acre (net) lot into two (2) parcels with the preservation of
an existing single-family residence on the site. The applicant also proposed the
construction of a new single family residence on the proposed rear parcel. The project
site is located at 1058 Hymettus Avenue and within the R-3 (Residential 3) Zoning
District and the Coastal Zone of the City of Encinitas (APN: 254-262-12).
Project Description and Discussion:. The .subject property consists of an existing 0.691 acre
parcel that gradually slopes.down from Hymettus Avenue to the westerly property line, and is
directly accessed from the Hymettus Avenue right-of-way. The project proposes the subdivision
of the existing 30,099-square foot lot into two lots. Lot 1, noted as Parcel 1 on the Tentative
Parcel Map, will be 14,500 square feet in gross and net lot area, and will be directly accessed via
the Hymettus Avenue right-of-way. Lot 2, noted as Parcel 2 on the Map, comprises the most
westerly portion of the existing lot and will have a net lot area of 15,602 square feet.. Parcel 2
will be accessed from the Hymettus Avenue right-of-way via a 20-foot wide panhandle (16-foot
paved) along the site's northern property line. Minor grading will be required as part of the
development process on Parcel 2. The City's Engineering Department will require a grading plan to
be processed. No grading is proposed on Parcell.
The subject R-3 Zoning District requires a minimum net lot area of 14,500 square feet and
minimum lot dimensions of 80 feet in width and 100 feet in depth. The proposed lot dimensions are
consistent with these required standards. The maximum residential density allowed for the subject
R-3 zone is 3.0 dwelling unitS per net acre: Net acreage calculations indicate a maximum of2.07
dwelling units could be allowed on the subject property (rounded down to 2 total). The project
proposes 2 residential lots. Therefore, the project complies with the density requirements of the
Municipal Code and General Plan. The applicant has submitted service availability letters
indicating that all required services are available for the project site.
The site is currently developed with a single-family residential structure with a dual access
driveway onto Hymettus Avenue. The most northerly driveway is located within the boundaries
of the proposed panhandle portion of Parcel 2. The property owner wishes to maintain the
existing driveWay with the recordation of a covenant stating that "the proposed easement within
PBD/RS/G:\N od\04-122tpmcdp
the proposed panhandle portion of Parcel 2 for the purpose of granting secondary access to
Parcel 1 shall be accepted at 16 feet to provide primary access to parcel 2. and secondary access
to Parcell until such time that a remodel, room addition, or new single-family development is
proposed on Parcell. Should any additions or new development be proposed on Parcell, the
current owner will. be required to either relinquish access off of the proposed
panhandle/easement or retrofIt the existing structure with a sprinkler system to the satisfaction of
the City Fire Marshal."
The applicant is also requesting approval for the construction a new two-story single family
residence on the proposed Parcel 2. The proposed dwelling unit consists of 3,699 square feet.of
living area and 576 square feet of garage. The proposed single-family dwelling with an attached
garage complies with all applicable development standards, including building setbacks; lot
coverage, and building height, for the subject R-3 Zoning District. In addition, the project will
also be required to comply with all applicable Building and Fire codes through the standard plan-
checking process. All applicable utilities and services are in place to support this development.
The applicant conducted a Citizen's Participation Program (CPP) in accordance with Chapter
23.06 of the Municipal Code. A public meeting was held on April 30, 2003. As noted in the
Final Citizen Participation Report on the CPP, 12 members of the public attended the meeting. The
property owners of adjacent properties expressed concerns regarding adequate drainage, privacy,
construction noise, and access to sewer easements. The owner addressed these comments by
informing the neighbors that drainage issues will be addressed and approved by the City Engineer.
The neighbors affected by the sewer lateral construction will be properly notifIed regarding the
duration and hours of construction. The owner also responded by indicating the compliance of the
proposed project with the rules and regulations of the City of Encinitas General Plan and Zoning
Regulations. A standard public notifIcation was issued for the Tentative Parcel Map and Coastal
Development Permit application, which allowed for a 20-day comment period. No oral or written
comments were received in regard to the proposed Tentative Parcel Map and Coastal Development
Permit.
This approval is based on the following fmdings:
FINDINGS FOR A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
STANDARD: Section 66474 of the California Government Code requires that the authorized
agency approve an application for a Tentative Map unless, based upon the information
presented in the application and during the Public Hearing, the authorized agency makes any
of the following findings of fact:
a. / That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specifIc plans as
specified in Section 65451 ofthe Subdivision Map Act.
Facts/Discussion: There is no specific plan associated with the subject property. The
General Plan allows for single family residential development at a maximum density of 3.0
dwelling units per net acre in the subject R-3 zone. The 2-lot subdivision is consistent with
the General Plan density range for the R-3 zone.
PBD/RS/G:\Nod\04-122tpmcdp
2
Conclusion: The Planning and Building Department finds that the proposed map IS
consistent with the General Plan.
b. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision IS not consistent with
applicable general and specifIc plans.
Facts/Discussion: Chapter 24.12 of the Municipal Code sets forth design standards for
subdivisions and Chapter 30.16 of the Municipal Code sets forth development standards
such as lot width, depth, and area requirements for the subject R-3 zone. The proposed 2-lot
subdivision exceeds the applicable development and design standards of the General Plan
and Municipal Code.
Conclusion: The Planning and Building Department finds that the design of the subdivision
is consistent with the General Plan and Municipal Code.
c. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development.
Facts/Discussion: The site contains sufficient area to permit the 2-lot subdivision and the
development of the proposed single-unit residence on the proposed Parcel 2 lot in
accordance with the development standards for the R-3 Zoning District.
Conclusion: The Planning and Building Department finds the subdivision project is
designed in such a manner to accommodate the existing single family unit on Parcel 1 and
the proposed development upon Parcel 2 in conformance with the applicable development
standards ofthe subject R-3 zone.
d. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
Facts/Discussion: The proposed 2-lot subdivision is consistent with the City's adopted
General Plan density range for the R-3 Zoning District, which is afforded a maximum
density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre. The net acreage calculations for the subdivision
indicate a site-specifIc maximum density of two (2) units. Therefore, the project complies
with the General Plan density provisions for the subject R-3 zone.
Conclusion: The Planning and Building Department finds that the subject site is physically
suitable for the proposed potential density of development.
e. That the design of the subdivision or of the proposed improvements is likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially or avoidably injure fIsh or wildlife or
their habitat.
Facts/Discussion: The project has been determined to be exempt from environmental
review pursuant to Sections 15303(a) and 15315 of the State CEQA Guidelines, which
exempts the construction of one new single family residence and the division of property
in urbanized areas zoned for residential use into four or fewer parcels when: the division
PBDIRS/G:\Nod\04-122tpmcdp
3
is in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are
required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available,
the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years,
and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent. No sensitive
species or sensitive habitats are present on the project site. The site is fully disturbed and
partially developed with an existing single family dwelling. No wetland or riparian
habitat exists on or near the project site.
Conclusion: The Planning and Building Department fInds that the design of the
subdivision and of the proposed improvement is not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially or avoidably injure fIsh or wildlife or their habitat.
f. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is likely to cause serious
public health problems.
Facts/Discussion: The applicant has provided letters of service availability from fire,
sanitation, water, and school districts which state that all services are available to serve the
proj ect.
Conclusion: The Planning and Building Department fInds that, since all necessary services
can be provided for the proposed project, the design of the subdivision and of the proposed
improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems.
g. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements,
acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed
subdivision. In this connection, the authorized agency may approve a map if it finds that
alternate easements, for access or for use, will be provided, and that these will be
substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall
apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of
competent jurisdiction and no authority is hereby granted to a legislative body to determine
that the public at large has acquired easements through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision.
Facts/Discussion: No easements have been identified on the subject property that would
conflict with the proposed subdivision.
Conclusion: The Planning and Building Department fInds that the design of the subdivision
or the type of improvements will not conflict with any easements, acquired by the public at
large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.
FINDINGS FOR A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
STANDARD: Section 30.80.090 of the Municipal Code provides that the authorized agency
must make the following fmdings of fact, based upon the information presented in the
application and during the Public Hearing, in order to approve a coastal development permit:
PBD/RS/G:\N od\04-122tpmcdp
4
1. The project is consistent with the certifIed Local Coastal Program of the City of Encinitas;
and
2. The proposed development conforms with Public Resources Code Section 21000 and
following (CEQA) in that there are no feasible mitigation measures or feasible alternatives
available which would substantially lessen any signifIcant adverse impact that the activity
may have on the environment; and
3. For projects involving development between the sea or other body of water and the nearest
public road, approval shall include a specific fInding that such development is in conformity
with the public access and public recreation policies of Section 30200 et. seq. of the Coastal
..Act.
Facts: The City's General Plan and Municipal Code are the applicable components of the
City's Local Coastal Plan. The project consists of a 2-lot residential subdivision and the
construction of a new two-story single family residence on the proposed Parcel 2. The
proposed parcels and development are consistent with all applicable zoning code
development standards. The project has been determined to be exempt from environmental
review pursuant to Sections 15303(a) and 15315 of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
Discussion: Related to finding No.1, with the approval of the Tentative Parcel Map
request, the project complies with or is conditioned to comply with the City's Local Coastal
Program and the Municipal Code. Related to finding No.2, the project is exempt from
environmental review and there is no potential for any significant adverse impact to the
environment from the project. Finding No.3 is not applicable since the project is not
located between the sea or other body of water and the nearest public road.
Conclusion: The Planning and Building Department fInds that 1) the project is consistent
with the certifIed Local Coastal Program of the City of Encinitas; 2) no potentially
signifIcant adverse impacts to the environment will result since the project is exempt from
environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15303(a) and 15315; and 3)
fIllding No.3 is not applicable to the project since the project site is not located between the
sea or other body of water and the nearest public road.
Environmental Review: This project has been found to be categorically exempt from
environmental review pursuant to Sections 15303(a) and 15315 of the State CEQA Guidelines,
which exempts the construction of one new single family residence and the division of property
in urbanized areas zoned for residential use into four or fewer parcels when: the division is in
conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are required, all
services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available, the parcel was not
involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years, and the parcel does not have
an average slope greater than 20 percent.
This approval is subject to the following conditions:
PBD/RS/G:\Nod\04-122tpmcdp
5
SC1 SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
SC4 Approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and all associated approvals will expire on October
12,2006 at 5:00 PM, two years after the approval of this project, unless the conditions have
been met or an extension of time has been approved pursuant to the Municipal Code.
SC6 This project is conditionally approved as set forth on the application dated received by the
City on May 24,2004; a single-sheet Tentative Parcel Map and project drawings consisting
of five (5) sheets of Site Plan, Floor Plans, Roof Plan, and Exterior Elevations, all dated
received by the City on September 2, 2004; all designated as approved by the Planning and
Building Director on October 12, 2004 and shall not be altered without express
authorization by the Planning and Building Department.
SCA The subject property is currently being served by a l-lh inch water meter. The current
owner may apply capacity credit toward the subject property. Upon development, each
parcel will be required to be individually metered. The owner may downsize the existing
1 lh inch meter and apply capacity credit toward the installation of new meters. All
meters that will receive capacity credit must be paid for and installed at one time. . Prior
to map recordation, the owner is required to provide the San Dieguito Water District with
a written statement indicating which lots will receive capacity credits.
SCB The San Dieguito Water District will require that water meters be located in front of the
parcel they are serving and outside of any existing or proposed travel way. Cost of
relocation is the responsibility of the developer.
SCC The developer will be required to show all existing and proposed water facilities on any
future improvement or grading plans requiring approval by the San Dieguito Water
District.
SCD The developer is required to comply with the San Dieguito Water District's fees, charges,
rules and regulations.
SCE Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, the applicant shall cause a covenant regarding real
property to be recorded. Said covenant shall state that "the proposed driveway easement
within the proposed panhandle portion of Parcel 2 for the purpose of granting secondary
access to Parcel 1 shall be accepted at 16 feet to provide primary access to parcel 2 and
secondary access to Parcell until such time that a remodel, room addition, or new single-
family development is proposed on Parcel 1. Should any additions or new development
be proposed on Parcel 1, the current owner will be required to either relinquish access off
of the proposed panhandle/easement or retrofIt the existing structure with a sprinkler
system to the satisfaction of the City Fire Marshal.
G1 STANDARD CONDITIONS:
CONTACT THE PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S):
PBDIRS/G:\Nod\04-122tpmcdp
6
G4 Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, the applicant shall cause a covenant regarding real
property to be recorded. Said covenant shall set forth the terms and conditions of this grant
of approval and shall be of a form and content satisfactory to the Planning and Building
Director.
G5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Municipal
Code and all other applicable City regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit
issuance unless specifIcally waived herein.
G 13 The subdivider/developer shall pay applicable development fees at the established rate. The
applicable fees may include, but shall not be limited to: Permit and Plan Checking Fees,
Water and Sewer Service Fees, School Fees, Traffic Mitigation Fees, Flood Control
Mitigation Fees, Park Mitigation Fees, and Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees. Prior to the
approval of the Parcel Map, the Planning and Building Department and the Engineering
Services Department shall approve arrangements and agreements for the payment of these
fees. The subdivider/developer is advised to contact the Planning and Building Department
regarding Park Mitigation Fees, the Engineering Services Department regarding Flood
Control and Traffic Fees, applicable School District(s) regarding School Fees, the Fire
Department regarding Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees, and the applicable Utility
Departments or Districts regarding Water and/or Sewer Fees.
M1 This approval may be appealed to the City Council within 10 calendar days from the date
of this approval pursuant to Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code.
F1 FIRE CONDITIONS:
CONTACT THE ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S):
F2 ACCESS ROADWAY DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus access roadways shall have an
unobstructed paved width of not less than 24 feet, curb line to curb line, or edge of
pavement to edge of pavement where no curbs are proposed, and an unobstructed vertical
clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. Access roads shall be designed and
maintained to support the imposed loads of fIre apparatus. Minimum design load is
65,000 Ibs. EXCEPTION: Access to one (1) single family residence shall not be less
than 16 feet of paved width, curb line to curb line, or edge of pavement to edge of
pavement where no curbs are proposed.
F3 ACCESS ROAD MINIMUM DIMENSIONS WHEN SERVING FOUR (4) OR LESS
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS WITH AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
INSTALLED: A fIre apparatus roadway providing access to not more than four (4) fire
sprinklered single family dwellings shall not be less than 16 feet in paved width, curb line
to curb line, or edge of pavement to edge of pavement where no curbs are proposed, with
an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches.
PBD/RS/G:\Nod\04-122tpmcdp
7
F5 GRADE: The gradient for a fIre apparatus roadway shall not exceed 20.0%. Grades
exceeding 15.0% (incline or decline) shall not be permitted without mitigation. Minimal
mitigation shall be the installation of automatic fIre sprinkler systems appropriate to the
structures and uses served. The angle of departure and angle of approach of a fIre access
roadway shall not exceed 7%.
F6 GATES: All gates or other structures or devices, which could obstruct fIre access
roadways or otherwise hinder emergency operations, are prohibited unless they meet
standards approved by the Fire Department. All automatic gates across fIre access
roadways shall be equipped with approved emergency key operated switches overriding
all command functions and opening the gate(s). Gates accessing four (4) or more
residences or residential lots, or gates accessing hazardous, institutional, educational, or
assembly occupancy group structures shall also be equipped with approved emergency
traffic control activating strobe light sensor(s) which will activate the gate on the
approach of emergency apparatus. All automatic gates must meet Fire Department
requirements for rapid, reliable access.
F7 RESPONSE MAPS: Any development that by virtue of new structures necessitates fIre
hydrants, roadways, or similar features, shall be required to provide a map in a format
compatible with current Department mapping services, and shall be charged a reasonable
fee for updating all Fire Department response maps.
F9 POSTING OR STRIPING ROADWAYS "NO PARKING FIRE LANE": Fire
Department access roadways, when required, shall be properly identifIed as per Fire
Department standards.
F13 ADDRESS NUMBERS: Address numbers shall be placed in a location that will allow
them to be clearly visible from the street fronting the structure. The numbers shall
contrast with their background, and shall be no less in height than: Four inches (4") for
single family homes and duplexes; Eight inches (8") for commercial and multi-family
residential buildings; and Twelve inches (12") for industrial buildings.
F14 ADDRESS NUMBERS FOR STRUCTURES LOCATED OFF ROADWAY: Where
structures are located off a roadway on long easements/driveways, a monument marker
shall be placed at the entrance where the easement/driveway intersects the main roadway.
Permanent address numbers with height conforming to Fire Department standards shall
be affIxed to this marker.
F15A AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM - SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND
DUPLEXES: Structures shall be protected by an automatic fIre sprinkler system designed
and installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Plans for the automatic fIre
sprinkler system shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of building
permit(s).
Fl8 CLASS "A" ROOF: All structures shall be provided with a Class "A" roof assembly to
the satisfaction of the Encinitas Fire Department.
PBD/RS/G:\N od\04-122tpmcdp
8
E1 ENGINEERING CONDITIONS:
CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S):
E2 All City Codes, regulations, and policies in effect at the time of building/grading permit
issuance shall apply.
EG 1 Gradin2 Conditions
EG3 The owner shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or
grading of the site.
EG4 The grading for this project is defined in Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code.
Grading shall be performed under the observation ofa civil engineer whose responsibility it
shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to ensure compliance of the work with the
approved grading plan, submit required reports to the Engineering Services Director and
verify compliance with Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code.
EG5 No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter of permission is
obtained from the owners of the affected properties.
EG6 A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a separate grading permit
issued for the borrow or disposal site if located within the city limits.
EG7 All newly created slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2: 1.
EG8 A soils/geologicallhydraulic report (as applicable) shall be prepared by a qualified engineer
licensed by the State of California to perform such work. The report shall be approved prior
to building permit issuance/at fIrst submittal of a grading plan, as applicable.
EG9 Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this
project the owner shall submit to and receive approval from the Engineering Services
Director for the proposed haul route. The owner shall comply with all conditions and
requirements the Engineering Services Director may impose with regards to the hauling
operation.
EG10 In accordance with Section 23.24.370 (A) of the Municipal Code, no grading pernlit shall be
issued for work occurring between October 1 st of any year and April 15th of the following
year, unless the plans for such work include details of protective measures, including
desilting basins or other temporary drainage or control measures, or both, as may be deemed
necessary by the fIeld inspector to protect the adjoining public and private property from
damage by erosion, flooding, or the deposition of mud or debris which may originate from
the site or result from such grading operations.
PBD/RS/G:\Nod\04-122tpmcdp
9
ED 1 Drainae:e Conditions
ED2A An erosion control system shall be designed and installed onsite during all construction
activity. The system shall prevent discharge of sediment and all other pollutants onto
adjacent streets and into the storm drain system. The City of Encinitas Best Management
Practice Manual shall be employed to determine appropriate storm water pollution control
practices during construction.
ED3 A drainage system capable of handling and disposing of all surface water originating within
the project site, and all surface waters that may flow onto the project site from adjacent
lands, shall be required. Said drainage system shall include any easements and structures
required by the Engineering Services Director to properly handle the drainage.
ED5 The owner shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to issuance of the building
permit for this project or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with the Master
Drainage Plan and City of Encinitas Standards as required by the Engineering Services
Director.
ED6 The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless covenant regarding
drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the grading or building permit for
this project.
ED8 The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from a 100-year
frequency storm under developed conditions is equal to or less than the runoff from a storm
of the same frequency and duration under existing conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour
storm durations shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to
accomplish the desired results.
ES 1 Street Conditions
ES5 Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, a right-of-way construction
permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Director and appropriate fees paid,
in addition to any other permits required.
ES6 In accordance with Chapter 23.36 of the Municipal Code, the owner shall execute and
record a covenant with the County Recorder agreeing not to oppose the formation of an
assessment district to fund the Installation of right-of-way improvements.
ES7 In accordance with Chapter 23.36 of the Municipal Code, the owner shall execute and
record a covenant with the County Recorder agreeing not to oppose the formation of an
assessment district to fund the undergrounding of utility facility improvements.
EU1 Utilities
EU2 The owner shall comply with all the rules, regulations, and design requirements of the
respective utility agencies regarding services to the project.
PBD/RS/G:\Nod\04-122tpmcdp
10
EU3 The owner shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G. & E., SBC/Pacific Bell, and
other applicable authorities.
EU4 All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including existing
utilities unless exempt by the Municipal Code.
EU4A The existing overhead utilities service to the property shall be undergrounded.
ESW1 Storm Water Pollution Control Conditions
ESW3 Best Management Practice shall be utilized for storm water pollution control to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The surface run off shall be directed over grass and
landscaped areas prior to collection and discharge onto the street and/or into the public
storm drain system. If pipes are used for area drainage, inlets shall be located to allow
maximum flow distance over grass and non-erodable landscape areas. A grass lined
ditch, reinforced with erosion control blanket, or a rip-rap lined drainage ditch shall be
used instead of a concrete ditch where feasible. Hardscaped areas and driveways shall be
sloped toward grassy and landscaped areas. Driveways with a grass- or gravel-lined
swale in the middle can be used if the site topography does not allow for the discharge of
driveway runoff over landscaped areas. The Grading Plan/ Tentative Map/ Permit
Site Plan shall identify all landscape areas designed for storm water pollution control
(SWPC). A note shall be placed on the plans indicating that the modifIcation or removal
of the SWPC facilities without a permit from the City is prohibited.
ESW9 For storm water pollution control purposes, all runoff from all roof drains shall discharge
onto grass and landscape areas prior to collection and discharge onto the street and/or into
the public storm drain system. Grass and landscape areas designated for storm water
pollution control shall not be modified without a permit from the City. A note to this effect
shall be placed on the Grading/Permit Site plan.
EM1 Mao
EM3 This project is approved specifIcally as 1 (single) phase.
EM5 Public/private improvement plans and grading plans shall be approved and adequate surety
shall be posted prior to a public hearing for approval of the final map.
Emrineerine: Soecial Conditions
1. Runoff from this property flows onto the adjacent private property to the southwest. The
developer shall design a detention basin to intercept runoff before it discharges from the
subject property in order to ensure that the rate of post-development runoff is equal to or less
than the predevelopment rate. The detention basin shall be designed in accordance with
Engineering Standard Condition ED8. A discharge system shall be designed to route the
runoff from the detention basin to the brow ditch along the westerly property boundary. A
PBD/RS/G:\N od\04-122tpmcdp
11
letter of permission must be obtained for the connection to the drainage ditch on the adjacent
property.
2. Sanitary sewer is available to service this property. The property shall connect to the
sanitary sewer system.
3. The applicant shall install a standard driveway apron to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
This notice constitutes a decision of the Planning and Building Department only. Additional
permits, including Building Permits, may be required by the Building Department or other City
Departments. It is the property owner's responsibility to obtain all necessary permits required for
the type of project proposed.
In accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code Section 1.12, this decision may be appealed to
the City Council within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this determination. The appeal must be
fIled, accompanied by the appropriate fIling fee, prior to 5:00 p.m. on the 10th calendar day
following the date of this notice of decision. The action of the Planning and Building Department in
reference to the above item may not be.appealed to the California Coastal Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact Roy Sapau at the Planning
and Building Department by telephoning (760) 633-2734.
-~ It tf~/Vt~~
Patrie Murphy
Planning and Building Department Director
PBD/RS/G:\Nod\04-122tpmcdp
12