1988-10-25
CITY OF ENCINITAS
PLANNING COMMISSION
. Regular meeting Agenda
and CORRECTED Minutes/Summary
535 Encinitas Boulevard
Encinitas, CA 92024
(619) 944-5060
Tuesday, October 25, 1988 - 7:00 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL - 7:15 PM
commissioners Present: Gail Hano, Chair; Les Bagg, vice
Chair; Pam Slater, Jeff Fernald
commissioners Absent: Nancy Reed
Staff Present: Patrick S. Murphy, Director, Community
Development; Bob Warren, City Engineer; Bill Weedman,
Senior Planner; Martin Miller, Planning Aide; Lea Kauflin,
Secretary
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Led by Bill Weedman
3. ANNOUNCEMENTS
Staff announced that the meeting is beginning late because
of the sister city reception delaying set up for the
Planning Commission.
4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None
. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Commissioner Bagg made the following corrections:
Meeting of September 27, 1988: Add: Commissioners
Absent: Les Bagg. Mr. Bagg noted Mr. Hirsch's comment
and stated that his absence was not a reflection on the
occasion of the resolution presented to Mr. Hirsch.
MSP (Slater/Fernald) to approve.
Vote: 3-0 (Bagg abstained)
Meeting of September 20, 1988:
MSP (Bagg/Fernald) to approve.
Vote: 4-0
Meeting of August 23, 1988:
Commissioner Bagg asked for confirmation of Commission
decision that inspections on the wall on the Frick
property be on an annual basis. (Commissioners confirmed
decision.)
Page 5:
-- Item 9A. Add that Commissioner Reed was absent,
deleting from following items.
-- On item "Allow consideration of duplex uses on legal
. lots regardless of lot size under R-15 and R-25
zones" add after vote "in favor".
PCMR1/0CT25-88.MIN (12/15/88) 1
P.C. Min. 10/25/88
Page 6:
. -- South Side of Leucadia Blvd. Change to read,
"Preferred Plan shows VSC for both s-e1:s
properties."
Page 7: (near bottom)
-- "Mr. Dawson stated ~we to set aside..."
Page 8: (4th paragraph from bottom)
-- Commissioner Bagg questioned term
"Office/Residential". Add quotes; not a Land Use
designation, but a term used by Mr. Mindlin.
-- Add language from Issues Report, Page 29: "Recommend
that site not be changed from residential; however,
recommend that Cardiff-area specific plan boundaries
be extended to include this site for consideration of
on-site mixed residential/office use under the
Specific Plan."
Vote: 4-0
MSP (Bagg/Slater) to approve with the above corrections/
additions.
Vote: 4-0
*July 26, 1988 - Continued; see motion below.
July 12, 1988:
Page 11:
-- (Item 8C) Commissioner Bagg was not present for this
item (conflict of interest).
. MSP (Bagg/Fernald) to approve with above corrections.
Vote: 3-0 (Slater not present at July 12 meeting
meeting).
*July 6 and June 29, 1988 - Continued; see motion below.
June 28, 1988:
Page 2:
-- Added to Consent Calendar: Item 8C.
Page 5:
-- Item 6D - Commission Bagg not present for th~~ item.
Change Second to Commissioner Hano. Add as A~
Bagg (not able to hear; participated in CAB
decision).
Page 12:
-- Motion not seconded by Commissioner Hirsch; (should
be Fernald).
-- Item 8E omitted. Add (continued under Consent
Calendar).
MSP (Bagg/Fernald) to approve with above corrections.
Vote: 3-0 (Slater not a Commissioner at this time.)
*June 20 and June 14, 1988 - Continued; see motion below.
MSP (HanojSlater) to continued minutes marked (*) to the
. November 15, 1988 meeting.
VOTE: 4-0
PCMR1/0CT25-88.MIN (11/2/88) 2
P.C. Min. 10/25/88
6. APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR
. A. CASE NUMBER: 88-109
APPLICANT: Carolynne Manka
LOCATION: 758 Rancho Santa Fe Road
DESCRIPTION: Acceptance of Resolution relative to
approval of the fence height Variance application to
exceed the 3.5' allowable fence height in the
exterior side yard setback by 2.5' for a total fence
height of 6'.
Staff stated that the applicant has asked for the
following changes:
Page 6A-3
-- 1. strike residential use as no longer her
residence.
-- 3. (4th line).
Change: "The adjoining residents of the
residential uses..."
To: "One of the adjoining residents of the
residential uses..."
Page 6A-4
-- 3. Staff thought the gate was to be locked. Dr.
Manka feels that was not the Commission's
direction.
The Commission confirmed that it was to be a
. locked gate. Dr. Manka asked if she abandoned
the request for a variance would she have to
"do these things". Staff replied, "No, and the
present fence would need to be removed." Dr.
Manka asked that this item be pulled from the
Consent Calendar.
MOTION: Commissioner Slater to remove 6A from the
Consent Calendar.
Second: Commissioner Fernald
Vote: Ayes - Slater, Fernald, Bagg, Hano
Nays - None
Absent - Reed
MOTION: Commissioner Slater to add the following to the
Consent Calendar: 7A (continue), 7B, 7D.
Second: Commissioner Fernald
Vote: Ayes - Slater, Fernald, Bagg, Hano
Nays - None
Absent - Reed
MOTION: commissioner Hano to add accept and approve the
Consent Calendar as reordered.
Second: Commissioner Slater
Vote: Ayes - Hano, Slater, Fernald, Bagg
Nays - None
. Absent - Reed
PCMR1/0CT25-88.MIN (11/2/88) 3
P.C. Min. 10/25/88
PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 6A OPENED AT 7:45 PM.
. Staff Report. Dr. Manka feels that to blow a horn each
time the gate is to be used would create additional
"hassle". It may be necessary to use the gate for
handicapped and elderly clients. state requirements
include accessibility for these special groups for all
businesses. Dr. Manka also feels that she cannot
accomplish grading to construct a road. Staff asked if a
statement were obtained from the resident by the
applicant, would the Commission be agreeable.
Applicant: Carolynne Manka, 758 Rancho Santa Fe Road.
She is not comfortable asking the resident for a
statement. Would like to be able to abandon the procedure
as it is not solving her problem.
Commission Discussion:
Commissioner Slater stated that she could not support the
gate not being locked unless the other party is present.
commissioner Hano supports unlocking the gate on a
"emergency" basis only which could be accomplished by Dr.
Manka's staff as clients are scheduled. If a compromise
could be reached by the applicant and the resident, she
would support that compromise. She asked if staff could
. get in touch with the resident. staff replied that they
could do this.
Staff stated if a complaint is received, Code Enforcement
would verify and the Variance could be revoked.
Dr. Manka referred to page 6A-4, Item 2. She suggested
that the "good neighbor" fence be constructed only if the
existing fence had to be taken down.
Commissioner Hano felt this was the case and Commissioner
Slater stated only if completely reconstructed.
MOTION: Commissioner Slater to continue this item to the
November 15 meeting.
Second: Commissioner Fernald
Vote: Ayes - Slater, Fernald, Hano
Nays - None
Abstain - Bagg 7:55 PM
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. CASE NUMBER: 88-216 MUP/DR
APPLICANT: Eugene Johnston
LOCATION: 400 N. EI Camino Real
. DESCRIPTION: Major Use Permit and Design Review for a
mini-warehouse addition to an existing shopping center.
PCMR1/0CT25-88.MIN (11/2/88) 4
P.C. Min. 10/25/88
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Exempt per CEQA section [15301
. (e) (2)] in that the total addition will be less than
5,000 square feet.
Staff stated this item is to be continued to November 15, 1988.
continuation approved on the Consent Calendar.
B. CASE NUMBER: 88-217 DR
APPLICANT: Eugene Johnston
LOCATION: 500 block of Forrest Bluff
DESCRIPTION: Design Review for 22 duplex residential
units. Lot line adjustment and minor
modification to major use permit 84-031
necessary to delete one lot and unit from
previous County approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Previous Negative declaration
certified by County of San Diego in conjunction with
subdivision review and approval.
Approved on the Consent Calendar.
C. CASE NUMBER: 88-188 MUP/DR/EIA
APPLICANT: D.E.B. Development
LOCATION: 1725 Olivenhain Road
DESCRIPTION: Major Use Permit, Design Review and
Environmental Initial Assessment for a day
care center in a residential zone, maximum
. number of children not to exceed 120.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative declaration pending
certification.
Staff Report: New Encinitas CAB recommends approval.
Originally 144 students proposed. New residents of
adjoining subdivision and applicant agreed to reduce
students to 120. Removing two classrooms and reducing
staff by two; freeing up more parking spaces. One concern
of the residents of the McMillin subdivision and the
applicant was regarding the City's acoustical consultant
stating that the noise attenuation wall along Olivenhain
Road be 8 feet high. Mr. Kamp indicated that when study
done, the computer model used a 8' high truck and a 5'
person -- to soften the noise to an acceptable level would
need a 8' high wall. Preschool people would be 3 feet
tall. with a build out of 45,000 ADT along Olivenhain
Road a 6 foot wall would be high enough. Would continue
the aesthetics of existing wall at the subdivision.
A new Plot Plan was given to staff by the applicant which
the Board members have not received. The building has
been reduced by about 800 sq.ft. Changes need to be made
to the resolution that the CAB approved.
. Commissioner Bagg asked if the sign for the project will
be in the same script and letter style as the sign for
McMillin's subdivision: material, color, etc. (Yes)
PCMR1/0CT25-88.MIN (12/15/88) 5
II
P.C. Min. 10/25/88
. Public Hearing opened at 8:05 PM.
Timothy D. Ramsey, Biggs Engr., for D.E.B. Development,
11388 Lake Rim Road, San Diego, CA 92131.
Page 7C-5. At the last Community Advisory Board meeting,
residents and CAB agreed to:
1. Hours of Operation - could be 6 AM to 6:30 PM.
2. Adul t meetings - instead of 1 night per month
that 18 meetings be authorized per year. No
classes will be held on weekends.
5. Number of students in playground at any one
time. Outdoor area up to 24: agreed the
number not be counted but the noise level is to
be between 60-65 decibels. Has no objections
to the 6 foot attenuation wall.
Page 7C-6.
1. six feet high along Olivenhain Road.
2. Signage - same as McMillin tract.
3. Playground area - 75 sq. ft. per child is still
computed on 144 children. No. of classrooms is
not being reduced, the size of classrooms being
reduced.
4. Topography - children basically 14 feet below
the upper wall.
5. Underground parking; adjacent property owners on
the south side have asked for a 6 foot wall
. three feet back. With suggested landscaping
they will never see the wall.
commission Discussion:
Commissioner Slater asked about an aide to sign people in
and out so that they would not have to go in and out of
the building, tying up parking spaces. Applicant stated
one space is allowed for drop off.
Ken Krysko, 2411 La Pluma Lane, Carlsbad, CA 92009,
representing Early Explorations. Above procedure not
necessary for full day children. Do plan to have someone
go outside to assist in the signing in and out for a half
day program (if offered).
Douglas Barnhart 16981 Via Tazon, San Diego 92127. There
are a couple of changes on the agreement per existing
agreement with homeowners:
Page 5 - The hours of 6:00 AM-6:30 PM are correct. Need
to add:
1. There would no class on the weekends.
2. A covenant is to be entered into stating there
would no staff parking on the street.
. commissioner Bagg emphasized that it should be very
pointed that staff will not park on the streets. He asked
PCMR1/0CT25-88.MIN (12/15/88) 6
P.C. Min. 10/25/88
if the number 65 refers to no more than 65 children would
. be on the playground at a given time.
staff stated the 24 (Page 7C-5, last line) is what was
used in previous daycare resolutions.
Mr. Barnhart
Page 7C-6:
1. There is to be downlighting in the parking
area.
2. The building would be 800 sq.ft. less (6600
square feet), creating two more parking spaces.
Page 7C-4, h. (last paragraph): The size of building
would be approx. 6600 sq.ft. instead of 7400 sq.ft.
Public Hearing closed at 8:20 PM.
Commission Discussion:
Commissioner Fernald supports using the noise level
(decibels) instead of number of children. Two prints with
revision date of 9/28. Square footage discussed--
determined that there is approximately 6300 square feet in
the current design.
commissioner Bagg made the following corrections to the
. resolution:
Page 7C-3:
1) Add August 16 to CAB meeting.
2) After October 3, should be an "and".
3) Blank under 2 - October 20, 1988.
Page 7C-5:
1) Item 1 (Specific Conditions) - change hours to
6:00-6:30 and add no classes on weekends.
2) Parent meetings are to be 18 nights per year.
3) Add absolutely no employee parking on the
street.
4) Item 5 - change language to state decibel level
with some way to monitor--only on complaints or
on a regular basis.
Staff stated if a complaint, the County Noise
Officer would go out. Asked about 65 students.
Commissioner Bagg stated the important thing is
the noise level.
Page 7C-6:
1) Item 6. Add language that indicates
downlighting. Since now there will be a 6 foot
high wall, might be a place to get lighting into
the parking lot.
2) Item 7. Is this a 5 foot wall or fence?
. Staff: 5' high fence. certain areas would have
PCMR1/0CT25-88.MIN (12/15/88) 7
P.C. Min. 10/25/88
to be 6' high. commissioner Bagg stated that
. the wall along Olivenhain Road is a 6' wall.
3) The sign is to match the subdivision.
Page 7C-8:
1) Item M (top of page) - submitted/modified - pick
one of them. Should be "as modified".
2) Item 2A - site "plan" not "plans". Indented
paragraph should be removed. Also the said
site plan is approved. Better be on the
drawings. Color board goes into the file.
Page 7C-10:
1) Fire requirement is heavy duty. Item 7A is a
standard condition but isn't really necessary
because of road along there.
One design issue: Hip appendage not large enough to
be treated that way--should be treated the same as
the trellis over the entry way. Not enough to make a
statement. Now that building is smaller, treating
those two elements the same would be preferable.
The columns are fine.
MOTION: Commissioner Bagg to approve the resolution
with the corrections/additions listed above.
Second: Commissioner Slater
. Applicant: Didn't want that architecture anyway--
prefers the trellis. It was a compromise in one of
the meetings in order to look more like a residence.
commissioner Bagg stated that either a trellis or a
solid roof would be acceptable, whichever works best.
Staff asked that the applicant provide a plan which
reflects the changes and elevations of what they will
be building--a modified plan and elevation sketch.
David L. Weiland, 2727 Hoover Avenue, National city
92050., representing . McMillin Communities, Scotts
Valley Partnership. The recommendation was from
McMillin. Their preference would be a hip treatment
over the entry as well instead of the two trellis.
Commissioner Fernald felt the trellises could be
connected with a fascia. Commissioner Bagg felt the
hip treatment would be too heavy--the aim is to keep
the building low and as far back as possible.
Trellis looks more residential.
VOTE: Ayes - Bagg, Fernald, Slater, Hano (with trellis)
Nays - None
Absent - Reed 8:40 PM
.
I PCMR1/0CT25-88.MIN (12/15/88) 8
I
I
I
I
!I ---
P.C. Min. 10/25/88
D. CASE NUMBER: 88-296 MUP
. APPLICANT: st. John's Church
LOCATION: 1001 Encinitas Boulevard
DESCRIPTION: Modification of Major Use Permit for
Phase 2 of st. John's Church for redesign of an
Approximately 14,000 sq. ft. Parish Center and
offices, and to allow placement of two temporary
classroom/office trailers on site until completion of
the permanent structures.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed modification is
consistent with the Negative Declaration previously
approved and certified for the church complex.
Approved on Consent Calendar.
E. Referral of General Plan Review Items to the Planning
commission for consideration and recommendation.
The Chair stated the absent member wants to be
present. Since one member has not been for all the
hearings the Chair stated there should four members
that know the issues well. Would like to honor this
request. Staff stated hesitancy because of
emergencies that occur. Commissioner Slater stated
she feels prepared and the Commission needs to go
ahead.
. Staff stated Commissioner Reed could submit her
comments in writing; the Commission cannot delegate
the veto power. This was agreeable.
This is a report item, not a public hearing as
indicated on the agenda.
CIRCULATION PLAN (PP 7E-1,2) (See attached)
MacKinnon Avenue - Delete from Circulation Element Map south of
Via Cardiff; designate via Cardiff as a Local from MacKinnon
south to Birmingham. General plan projected about 8,000 local
trips. County General Plan calls its villa Cardiff. (same as
Via Cardiff) - should be Villa Cardiff.
Support above recommendation.
VOTE: 4-0
Orpheus Avenue - Delete from Circulation Map between Leucadia
Blvd. and Vulcan Avenue. 3-4,000 a day projected.
VOTE: 4-0
Lake Drive. Delete from the map south of Birmingham.
VOTE: 4-0
Requeza Street and Nardo Road. Delete Requeza east of Westlake
. and Nardo south of Requeza from the map. Traffic for Nardo is
2,000 ADTs and Requeza is about the same. Commissioners Hano
asked date of last study. Staff stated that the Terry Austin
PCMR1/0CT25-88.MIN (11/2/88) 9
~
P.C. Min. 10/25/88
study on the sphere did not change these earlier figures.
. Commissioners Slater and Hano questioned the validity--feels it
would be more like 6,000 ADTs.
Commissioners Fernald and Slater would like to see both remain
as Locals. Commissioner Bagg is neutral but feels they carry
more than 2,000 ADTs.
Commissioner Hano stated Santa Fe Drive via Nardo to Requeza
carries the largest volume--intense. Most traffic goes down
Westlake. Entire length of Requeza should be a Local.
VOTE: 4-0 that it remain a Local.
Village Park Avenue. Delete from Circulation Elememt Map north
of Mountain vista.
Commissioner Hano stated the Encinitas Union School District
Board has requested again that this road be opened.
Commissioner Bagg doesn't support opening this road. Council
doesn't feel it should be opened. Commissioner Fernald feels
that something should tie through to Rancho Santa Fe Road and
stated that a good portion of Olivenhain residents agree.
VOTE: 2-2 (Fernald and Hano opposed)
(Staff stated tie vote is a denial.)
Quail Drive connection - Sidonia to Saxony:
Council did try to better define where the alignment of Quail
Drive would occur connecting to Saxony. The important issue
. was that it would connect to Leucadia Boulevard and beyond,
north to Sidonia. It is shown going through an existing
residential area, connecting to Quail Hollow. It should occur
east of Sidonia. Exact alignment is uncertain and exact impact
is uncertain. commission reviewed attached information handed
to them at the beginning of this meeting.
Commissioner Slater asked if improper to consider because it
did not go through environmental review as required by CEQA.
Staff stated "no problem"--not that specific. When alignment
study occurs, this review would be made.
If Sidonia--what effect on the project? Commissioner Hano
asked about impact on Quail Hollow. If alignment is not on
Sidonia, there would be a potential impact on Quail Hollow.
Council is specifically saying they did not want it on Sidonia
or on the residential areas to the east. Question is where.
Important to connect Leucadia to Saxony.
Commissioner Slater stated it should not impact existing
neighborhood.
Saxony Hills map has been recorded. Sidonia extension does not
affect the subdivision--allowances have been made.
. Commissioner Fernald asked about effects on canyons, etc.
Staff stated there is a severe drop to get to Sidonia.
PCMR1/0CT25-88.MIN (12/15/88) 10
P.C. Min. 10/25/88
. Commissioners Slater and Hano recommend none of the above,
should look for another route; another route that would impact
the existing neighborhood and the development in the least
possible way.
Bob Warren stated there is a distinct possibility that it can
work with a minor impact.
commissioner Bagg stated that the connection does not need to
be designed to freeway standards. Can have some severe
corners. Commissioner Slater stated it should be a residential
road.
Commissioner Hano mentioned the Speaker Slips from Coast
Savings, Apec Engineering. Though not taking testimony, the
Commission can ask questions.
Commissioner Bagg stated connection needs to be made. Specific
alignment of the road needs to impact the residential and
environmentally sensitive areas as little as possible. Design a
road that fits the terrain. Slater concurs.
VOTE: 3-0 (Hano abstains)
commission Hano asked what impact will that road have on the
proposed map. She stated that they agreed to single family
. detached. If the road goes through, would they have to go back
to original proposal which is not single family? If back to
first plan, does it open it up again. commissioner Slater
feels this is set forth in the attached letter.
Bill Leonard, l6935 W. Bernardo Drive, San Diego 92127,
representing Coast Savings made a statement that this item was
noticed as a public hearing and placed on the agenda under
Public Hearings. They were advised by city staff that it was a
public hearing. Staff stated it was not noticed, only listed
on the agenda. Mr. Leonard asked that the letter (attached) be
received into the record.
LAND USE PLAN: (Page 7E-2)
Southeast quadrant of El Camino Real at Olivenhain Road.
Council recommends Specific Plan. Gives greater control.
Bagg recommends support.
VOTE: 4-0
Residential density allowance related to constraints. (See
page 7E-22, Recalculation of Slope Density Analysis Per Council
Request.) Council adding flood plain. A developer could
achieve maximum density by making specific findings to the
approving authority. These would include exceeding the
. minimum development standards of the Zoning Code or the project
is providing significantly more public improvements that what
is required or more recreational facilities. commissioner Bagg
PCMR1/0CT25-88.MIN (11/2/88) 11
P.C. Min. 10/25/88
asked if these bonus benefits are specified in the Zoning
. Ordinance. staff responded that these are only examples of
how it is implemented. council is talking about mid-range and
maximum density and slope density; therefore this item needs to
be referred back to Planning Commission. commission Bagg
stated his concern was that another benefit might be thought up
not covered by Zoning Code. Staff stated the Council's sliding
scale should be included in the General Plan and needs
Planning commission input. commissioner Bagg commented, "Good,
but no proven tie between slope and restriction on building on
it. Strictly a density reduction tool. Not a given that "the
steeper the land the more dangerous." Commissioner Fernald
stated Method 3 gives a break to slope over 25%. Doesn't mind
giving them more, but the question is what percentage.
Commissioner Hano stated with slopes and other constraints, a
certain 300-acre parcel out in Olivenhain is likely to get only
40 dwelling units. Does not support the double constraints.
Design Review is going to be the whole plan. Commissioner
Fernald stated that a fair amount of this parcel is steep
hillside and steep creek beds.
Commissioner Bagg asked how many residences approved on
Rheingold - 58. This would take it down to 35 or 47 (mid-
range/maximum).
Commissioners Fernald and Slater support Council recommendation
. -- Method 3). Commissioner Bagg feels Method 3 is the best of
the four methods being considered, but he has a problem with
cutting density using slope.
VOTE: 2-2 (Hano/Bagg feel there is a better way.)
Various commercial land use designations: VSC to General
Commercial and Local Commercial to Office Professional:
- Northeast quadrant of LaCosta at railroad right-of-way.
100-150 feet at deepest part and a triangle. Return to
residential.
VOTE: 4-0 support to return to residential.
- Northwest corner of Leucadia Blvd. at i-5. from General
Commercial to visitor-Serving Commercial.
VOTE: 4-0 to support.
- Northeast corner of Leucadia Blvd. at Vulcan. Change from
General Commercial to Local Commercial. (7-11). Mistake.
VOTE: 4-0 to support.
- East side of Vulcan between Leucadia Blvd. and Union.
Show school district lots as public/semi/public.
Remainder presently shown as General Commercial (GC);
Local Commercial (LC) and Office Professional (OP)
. considered; proposed for OP. Bank would be OP; local
restaurant would be LC. Everything on Vulcan would be OP
PCMR1/0CT25-88.MIN (11/2/88) 12
P.C. Min. 10/25/88
including Bunyards. commissioner Bagg stated he has
. difficulty including Bunyards. commissioner Slater asked
if LC would be okay for Bunyards. Commissioner Bagg
asked about the strip along Vulcan - depth varies. Mobile
home park would be MHP. Bunyards now has General
Commercial (C-2). If and when they are not there, doesn't
see that strip as being the shape that would encourage GC.
OP would be better. Staff stated that Bunyards would be
able to expand, but a like use would not be able to take
its place. If assured not damaging Bunyards operation,
would support OP as the most reasonable long-term use of
the land. Commissioner Slater concurs. Commissioner Hano
stated that if using the same percentage as used to add
onto a nonconforming house, doesn't agree. Commissioner
Fernald stated this should be addressed in the Zoning
Code.
VOTE: 3-1 (Hano against) (Bagg, Slater, Fernald Agree
that a provision that current business be protected must
be included.)
- Water District Office on "D" Street, from GC to Publici
Semi-Public.
VOTE: 4-0
- Northeast, southwest and southeast corners of Birmingham
at I-5. Change from GC to VSC.
VOTE: 4-0
. - Northeast and northwest corners of Mountain vista Drive
at Village Parkway. GC to LC (7-11); Public/Semi-Public
for fire station.
VOTE: 4-0
- Southwest corner of Encinitas Blvd. at Manchester. LC to
OP except for corner gas station site.
VOTE: 4-0
- Southeast corner of Encinitas Blvd. at Manchester
("Village West" Shopping Center) LC to GC. Permitted uses
discussed. commission felt that many of the uses in a GC
zone would be inappropriate at this commercial site.
Development standards may be different between a GC and LC
zone.
VOTE: 4-0 to support LC
- Southwest corner of "J" at Second Street: show corrected
location of Post Office under Public/Semi-Public; show
private lot north of Post Office as GC. Commissioner Hano
supports keeping residential including the Post Office
site. commissioner Bagg has reservations about the
private lot; it should remain residential. Map identifies
that corner as GC and remainder as residential.
. commissioner Bagg mentioned OP; commissioner Hano in favor
of General Commercial.
PCMR1/0CT25-88.MIN (11/2/88) 13
P.C. Min. 10/25/88
VOTE: 4-0 (Post Office and property to north corner
. as OP, with the rest residential 15-25
south of Post Office.)
- site east of Paul Ecke Central School and west of Orpheus
Avenue (Orpheus park site). Ecological/Open Space/Park.
VOTE: 4-0
- Lake Sports Drive Complex - Ecological/Open Space/Parks.
If leased can be Open Space.
VOTE: 4-0. No recommendation - Dr. Fazio should be
contacted. If they concur, would support Council
recommendation. [Response from Dr. Fazio supported Open
Space/Parks.]
- Sun vista Park at terminus of Avendia La Posta in New
Encinitas. Correct to Ecological/Open Space/Parks.
Vote: 4-0
Other issues:
A. "Limited LC" and "Limited VSC" are possible new
zones in the Zoning Code. Currently under
consideration by Council. Discussed General Plan
commercial designations. These will be discussed
during the Zoning Code review. commissioner Bagg
favors Limited Visitor Serving Commercial zone as a
. separate zone.
B. Floating "P" relative to Parks. Different Floating
"P" sites have been plotted. The Commission concurs
with the Floating "P" (Park) designation and the map
identifying the Floating "P" sites.
9. ADJOURNMENT- 10:25 PM
MOTION: commissioner Bagg to adjourn to the November 15
meeting.
Second: Commissioner Slater
VOTE: Ayes - Bagg, Slater, Fernald, Hano
Nays - None
Absent - Reed
.
PCMR1/0CT25-88.MIN (12/15/88) 14
I